Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

will be recieving my gt3076r .6 front .82 exh next week

what im wondering is should i go and highmount it with just a cheap ebay manifold or keep it low mounted?

am i going to gain anything besides look/exh note.

who has had exp with these and what should i look out for?

or should i just keep stock manifold and throw my ext gate off the .82 turbine?

i wanna hit 300kw with this turbo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/308634-gt3076r-manifold/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

wont the stock manifold fall over top end around the 300kw mark?

with that 3582 it felt ok top end but thats alot bigger turbo? i really dont know, id love a etm manifold.. maybe thats what i should save for?

also im going to have to cut into exh housing to run ext gate.

Edited by l0WRB
hey guys

will be recieving my gt3076r .6 front .82 exh next week

what im wondering is should i go and highmount it with just a cheap ebay manifold or keep it low mounted?

am i going to gain anything besides look/exh note.

who has had exp with these and what should i look out for?

or should i just keep stock manifold and throw my ext gate off the .82 turbine?

i wanna hit 300kw with this turbo

No offense intended but it just seems strange that you would just get rid of your old setup which had a fair bit of cash behind it and then purchase an expensive replacement turbo but not want to spend some cash on a good manifold.

What do you want from this setup really. Obviously you dont want to just hit 300rwkw peak power cause you had that with your old setup. You can hit 300rwkw with a GT3076 on a stock manifold but surely you would want the best possible setup. Especially with a 0.82 rear.

Correction Harey, he wants 300rwkw like his old setup yet without the lag.

Hav u considered having a manifold made yet Justin? if you were in sydney I could recommend someone who would probably charge less than the average expensive manifold with quality IMO far superior. If you can find someone up there in banana town who you think is that good I say get that done.. as fancy as you want it and gate where u want it also..

The 3582 spec high flow just turned out to be mega laggy with the KKR housing for some reasons. I managed better response with more power using a generic .82 turbine housing with the same CHRA. So I traded it off with a GT3076 56T .82 with cash adjustments. This will make 300rwkws with far better response.

Manifold wise if you are on external gate stock manifold is ok for 300rwkws. With Ebay manifold you have to machine both flanges flat before installation and make sure there aren't any hanging welds stuck on the inside of the manifold. Apart from that they ok to use. Also check your external gate make sure its sealing probably.

well after talking to a few ppl about these manifolds and the drama's they cause, im going to keep the factory rb25 manifold for now, until later in the year when i can afford a ETM manifold which would be perfect :D

ill just run the 50mm gate off the .82 turbine, hopefully that will hold 21psi perfect for the dyno and achieve me 300kw

harey i might have cracked the 300kw at wheels but my power delivery was horrible, not to mention the boost drop between gears and the lagg. like stao said it could have been the kkr housing, but i was so over trying dif combo's i wanted to bolt on a proven turbo and be done with it.

id love 300kw full noise and torquey mid range at 4000-4300rpm

its booked in on 5th march 2 be finished tuned and complete

well after talking to a few ppl about these manifolds and the drama's they cause, im going to keep the factory rb25 manifold for now, until later in the year when i can afford a ETM manifold which would be perfect :D

ill just run the 50mm gate off the .82 turbine, hopefully that will hold 21psi perfect for the dyno and achieve me 300kw

harey i might have cracked the 300kw at wheels but my power delivery was horrible, not to mention the boost drop between gears and the lagg. like stao said it could have been the kkr housing, but i was so over trying dif combo's i wanted to bolt on a proven turbo and be done with it.

id love 300kw full noise and torquey mid range at 4000-4300rpm

its booked in on 5th march 2 be finished tuned and complete

didnt you have a high mount manifold for the GT35?

There is not that much lag with a 3076. I had a std hiflow before that and it was stronger down low, too quick for wet or greasy days. like driving around on ice.

The 3076 is much more progrossive at the lower street leagl speeds - but it goes hard above say 3,500-4000 rpm and gives you the power where you want it for overtaking or such.

I love mine, it made my car so much nicer to drive round town, but gets wicked when you stick it to it.

All the positive comments about the 3076 matched to RB25 are right. It will give you progressive response, 400rwhp, and top end breathing so it produces power to 7500ish on stock cams.

Rather than play with the housing, you should consider fabricating a pipe into either the manifold or the spacer plate. Frome memory Simon R-32 has some knowledge of that method.

yes i really dont want to hack up .82 turbine to fit the gate, i mite look at some other options... i would use the spacer adapter+wg flange, but mines 50mm vband, thats suited for 2bolt flange like a tial gate? hmmmm

those bolt on spacers with adaptor are too long anyway, you will need to get an exhaust shop to make one that angles the turbo which you can then get them to add on your 50mm attachment :)

altho i cant take credit for the info, i wont say who told me for his sake :ermm:

I dont know how im going to go about it now. my tuner really wants to put wastegate off turbine housing, but id prefer some other way. but im limited with stock manifold. have ppl had good success with running external gate straight off the manifold collector on top?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...