Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

True. But we do have a fairly solid track emphasis on this site with a lot of people either using their cars part time on the track or building full time track cars. The comparison is definitely warranted as not everybody wants to do the wrong thing by using no cat on the street. If they do, Bad luck if you get caught.

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My car melts cats... Lucky I stick to the track! :down:

The comparison also, for those doing non cat, to cat testing should be done with a brand new cat.

A mildly collapsed cat will rob massive amounts of power!

This was a good upgrade over the factory cat which was replaced as it had signs of internal cracking, also the sound opened up nicely.

Nice looking bit of gear.....Who is it made by ?

Nice looking bit of gear.....Who is it made by ?

Hi there NSNPWR, the cat is a Metal Type X-Force which works well, reiterating this is the Canon Version, I would not even consider the flat bodied at all. I the original pics you will see the heat shield, well if you purchase this be aware that the heat shield faces up toward the car as it should, cheers

post-64397-1266705584_thumb.jpg

Hi there NSNPWR, the cat is a Metal Type X-Force which works well, reiterating this is the Canon Version, I would not even consider the flat bodied at all. I the original pics you will see the heat shield, well if you purchase this be aware that the heat shield faces up toward the car as it should, cheers

Part Number <LI>ES-NS-13-CAT-B3 metal hiflow cat [32cm long / 4 1/2" round]

http://www.bestmufflers.com/bshop/index.php?cPath=329

great power gain results hypergear, but you failed to mention the 6psi boost difference between runs, and i'm suprised no one else mentioned it...

exactly my thought. the boost should have been turned back down for a true comparison.

having said that ive seen ~5kW gain at peak power and 500rpm boost response left shift doing back to back runs on a ~280kW setup, having turned the boost down to match the first run.

  • 3 weeks later...
Wouldnt dynoing with a decat give more acurate results as far as AFR's go

or do cats actually do nothing to effect what come outa the tail pipe ???????

Yes pretty sure that with the CAT the AFR would be more accurate, however the question was .....how much power is achieved without it, we are not talking about tuning the car without the cat but merely identifying the robbing power effect from hang it and if some had removed it for interested on the dyno and what difference / increases if any did they achieve.

Under not circumstances are we suggesting that a Cat be removed off of a road car, was a topic of conversation between mates is all, read the initial post, cheers

Wouldnt dynoing with a decat give more acurate results as far as AFR's go

or do cats actually do nothing to effect what come outa the tail pipe ???????

A better place for AFR reading is actually in the dump pipe. With and without a cat, the AFR readings vary from front to rear of the exhaust.

My car is tuned with the AFR taken around 2 to 3 feet after the turbo.

And from a good quality, good condition high flowing cat, to no cat, there will be a minimal power gain (Talking 5RWKW max) but others will say "But I got 50RWKW from removing mine!" but they fall into the category of either:

Too small of a cat

Low quality cat

Non Highflow cat

Partially collapsed cat (Bad condition)

Yes pretty sure that with the CAT the AFR would be more accurate

so the cat has no effect on emissions then an is pointless???

Sorry if you thought I was off topic an I guess I was

was just interested to see if others thought Decat was a worthwhile thing to do during tuning runs

A better place for AFR reading is actually in the dump pipe. With and without a cat, the AFR readings vary from front to rear of the exhaust.

My car is tuned with the AFR taken around 2 to 3 feet after the turbo.

Agree this is the best way however most are done from the tailpipe

guys bit off topic but saw the 20k fine and wanted to ask? my car is currently on defect and im going to regency soon (adelaide defect inspection place ), now im pritty sure my cats been gutted cause a flame or to has come out my zorst, if they find out that it infact has been gutted will i get fined straight away?

sorry to highjack the thread :{

cheers

guys bit off topic but saw the 20k fine and wanted to ask? my car is currently on defect and im going to regency soon (adelaide defect inspection place ), now im pritty sure my cats been gutted cause a flame or to has come out my zorst, if they find out that it infact has been gutted will i get fined straight away?

sorry to highjack the thread :{

cheers

Change it before going for inspection.

Put a compliance cat in.

You want it 100% legal when you go for an inspection.

guys bit off topic but saw the 20k fine and wanted to ask? my car is currently on defect and im going to regency soon (adelaide defect inspection place ), now im pritty sure my cats been gutted cause a flame or to has come out my zorst, if they find out that it infact has been gutted will i get fined straight away?

sorry to highjack the thread :{

cheers

I am starting to regret starting this thread and reiterate UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE RUN YOUR ROAD CARS WITHOUT A CAT.....if you are running without one, put a decent one back on and stop skimping on cash, most of the lads I know are making some decent power and if they loose a few KW from (legal compliance with a CAT) they could not care a less, reiterate they could not care a stuff if they lost 25KWATW, this would be a different story on the track where every KW matters, not on the street......NOT on the street

BUY A DECENT CATALYTIC CONVERTOR..........and do not attend inspection centres without one, remember that its the minority that makes it bad for the majority us, think of the HOON stigma, just a few dipsticks out there make it bad for all of us!

Video option did a back to back dyno test of an r34 gtr (may have been the top secert gtr can't remeber) with no cat then apexi high flow cat, no cat only made 7hp more. I try and find the video link. Btw this was no light tune gtr it was making upwards of 600hp

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...