Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Pulled my rb30/26 down over the last 2 weeks and today finally got to taking the pistons out. Basically I have 87mm rb30et pistons in there now, and I have new higher CR pistons to go back in which will yield 9.5:1

I had the bottom end built by an engine builder back in the day. I pulled them out to find this, marks were on every cyliner and on both inlet/exhaust side of the bore:

post-13028-1267327105_thumb.jpg

post-13028-1267327123_thumb.jpg

post-13028-1267327149_thumb.jpg

Now I have two questions:

1. Is this caused by incorrect piston to bore clearance? If not what is likely to have caused it?

2. Can I give the bores a lite hone and re-fit my new 87mm pistons and be OK? The bores are 87mm at the moment, and the new pistons are too, hence the issue.

Some people have told me a lite bottle brush hone to get the marks out won't hurt, others have told me to ditch the block all together and hone out another 30 block to suite my new 87mm pistons.

Issue with that is I spent many a hours modifying this block for the 4wd adapter plate :blush:

Anyways what be SAU's opinion.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/310036-what-has-caused-this-marks-on-bore/
Share on other sites

I wouldn't imagine piston to bore would play as a factor here given it is on all cylinders in the same spot.

Potentially, could it have been a problem with lubrication, as in the squirters were not getting to those points in the bore?

Or a more unlikely cause could be too many revs while the engine is cold and the pistons have not expanded fully causing the bore wear?

Just some ideas...

I would speak to the bloke that built it though - how long had the motor been going before the pull down?

First off you can still see the cross hatching in those dark areas, so the finish is still fine. It doesnt look like any abnormal wear, if it was you would see straight up and done scratch marks in those dark spots, it looks like something has stained your bores. But always hard to tell just looking at photos.

Is it carbon build? will it scratch off? does it still feel smooth, try and describe it to us a bit more.

Also a second interesting clue is that the dark strip goes down below the line where the top of the piston would be at the bottom of its stroke.

There is also a very clear line at the top where it stops, it looks like the line could line up with one of the rings. Figure out where the top of that line lines up with the piston when its at TDC that might give you another clue to what is causing it.

Also do the same at the bottom of the stoke.

But it almost looks like the oil squirters are squirtering at that spot at the bottom (hence the rounded stain at the bottom) and the piston is dragging it up to the top. Over time it could of just stained the bore.

Then again like I said its still very hard to diagnoise properly without having a proper look.

Edited by ascenion24
when the engine was rebuilt last time, was the block torque plate bored and honed? have you taken messurements in all different areas of the bore to see how round it is...

valid point

Cartman has it spot on, you have blow by because the bore is out of round. It should be nice and shiny like the rest of the bore because your rings are scraping, they are not scraping on your black bit. You probably didn't even notice this when driving, may have used just a tad more oil, but not much, and would have vented a bit more that usual into your catch can

are the marks on the pistons where the skirts are???

this is the largest part of the piston, i reckon the piston to bore clearance was too tight,

another possibility is the pistons have swelled during an extreme heat session, big burnout, too many hard laps on circuit etc.

Thanks for all the help guys.

Yeah it did burn oil ever so slightly, according to a mate following me once under load it was evident. It ran a 100% atmo catch can too so this probably explains the burning oil. Has a brand new head so I knew it was not stem seals that was causing the issue.

I think your right in that the bores are out. I don't know how it was done last time unfortunately, I just took it to a local mob with the pistons and they bored it out to 87mm and assembled it with the pistons I supplied.

I ran a bottle brush through no6 this afternoon very quickly and it took the marks right off and it looked brand new again. Obviously I still have a major problem but.

Waiting on a mate to bring some equipment around so we can measure the bores properly.

So where too from here? Another block?

take off your old comp rings and keep in order of cylinder, carefully put them in there matching cylinder and check the ring gaps, you will also be able to see if the bore marks are out of round, this is not accurate you still need to measure with a bore gauge

a new block depends on the meat you have to remove to get it round again, it may still be within spec and OK you need to mike up the bore both ways and then check that against clearance spec's

Thanks for all the help guys.

Yeah it did burn oil ever so slightly, according to a mate following me once under load it was evident. It ran a 100% atmo catch can too so this probably explains the burning oil. Has a brand new head so I knew it was not stem seals that was causing the issue.

I think your right in that the bores are out. I don't know how it was done last time unfortunately, I just took it to a local mob with the pistons and they bored it out to 87mm and assembled it with the pistons I supplied.

I ran a bottle brush through no6 this afternoon very quickly and it took the marks right off and it looked brand new again. Obviously I still have a major problem but.

Waiting on a mate to bring some equipment around so we can measure the bores properly.

So where too from here? Another block?

James, were the pistons installed the correct way around? Did the piston skirts appear to have excessive wear. The pin offset the wrong way around could have the rod angle incorrect at TDC.

since the marks go well past where the rings sit, to me looks like to much piston to bore clearance. since the skirt has rubbed it up aswell. they were installed the right way round? little dot or arrow facing forward?

its fairly normal to get those marks up top with forgies, but not the whole way down past the rings. what pistons were they? and what ones are you putting in?

I've had marks like these in an engine before and it was due to excessive piston to bore clearance. Do the pistons have polished areas above the top ring on the thrust faces? You get this when the piston "tips" in the bore. Must've been noisy on cold starts..

Hey guys,

I think your right, piston to bore clearance. Pistons were all around the right way, according to the mark.

Pistons that it had were CP.

Measured it all up tonight, I think they have added the piston to bore clearance to the actual hone itself.

Bores were showing a fairly consistant 87.07 across the board. Plus whatever CP recommend on top of that again which is like 3-3.5 thou I read.

I think that is what has happend anyway. Skirts are all showing signs of wear yes.

Sound plausible?

Edited by James_03

Unless I worked that out incorrectly, thats only 2.8 thou of clearance. I assume the piston size is 87mm at the skirt? .07 is only .0028" Unless your measuring devices are not accurate enough???

What if the piston to bore was too tight, not too excessive? Would the rubbing show up much the same? or would it be in four corners instead of just two?

If it was too tight then it should have scored the bore and the piston should have score marks on the top skirt above the top ring lands due to 'unaccommodated' heat expansion.....well thats my take.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...