Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

better seat = more supportive. don't try to make it more complex than it is

reasonable explanation :P

sounds good, as long as it suits the other trim bits... hate seeing cars with red buckets and black everything else

problem is that the holes in the 33 are designed for a bottom mount seat and as such are too close to the middle. side mount requires them to be further apart.

basically i had some bride FG rails and was trying to put a side mount sparco seat in there and the seat was like 50mm wider than the space between the rails.

if you get desperate just run the stock seat i spose... or you could borrow mine for the day if you CBF getting them from micolour?

My rails were designed for Recaro SR3, by top mounted I mean the seats sit on top of the rails.

For you Billy, you can have both fOr $200, frOm memory, Thuy from J-Imports is selling $200ea

My rails were designed for Recaro SR3, by top mounted I mean the seats sit on top of the rails.

For you Billy, you can have both fOr $200, frOm memory, Thuy from J-Imports is selling $200ea

What car were they made to suit? Will they bolt straight up?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't think the shuffle can damage the turbos. It only happens at low shaft speeds and loads. It's just annoying (to some people - others are tickled by the effect) and it quite possibly reduces spool performance a little bit.
    • Oh dear. The panel beating needs to be done before the filler work. Do you have a photo of the dent before you started? Hard enough to not flex and only hit the high spots?  What do you mean it was just temporary? 
    • Can u check this way it works for power supply?
    • These coils draw 10amps that what i read online
    • I appreciate the detailed explanation, think I understand now. I spent the better part of last night reading what I could about shuffle and potential solutions. I had replaced the OEM twin turbo pipe with an alternate Y pipe that is separated further away from the turbo. The current one is from HKS and I had a previous pipe that was separated even further away, both have shuffle. I had heard that a divider can be welded in to the OEM pipe to remove turbulence, and figure that aftermarket pipes that are more separated would achieve the same thing. From what I read, most people with -10 turbos get shuffle due to their size, though it's a bit less common with -5s on a standard RB26. I think Nismoid mentioned somewhere it's because OEM recirculation piping is common in Australia with -5 cars. It seems that the recommendation tends to vary between a few options, which I've ordered in what I think is most feasible for me:  1. Retune the MAP or boost controller to try to eliminate shuffle 2. Install OEM recirculation piping 3. Something called a 'balance pipe' welded onto the exhaust manifolds. I don't know if kits for this are available, seems like pure fabrication work 4. simply go single turbo My current layout is as follows: Garrett 2860 -5s HKS Racing Suction intake MAF delete pipes HKS racing chamber intake piping hard intercooler piping,  ARC intercooler HKS SSQV BOV and pipe Haltech 2500 elite ECU and boost solenoid/controller HPI dump pipes OEM exhaust manifolds HKS VCAM step 1 and supporting head modifications Built 2.6 bottom end All OEM recirculation piping was removed, relevant areas sealed off I'll keep an eye out for any alternative solutions but can get started with this.  Only other question is, does shuffle harm the turbo (or anything else)? It seems like some people say your turbo shafts will explode because of the opposing forces after a while and others say they just live with it and adjust their pedal foot accordingly. 
×
×
  • Create New...