Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

my opinion is that people shouldnt make any claims unless they have documented factual proof,they should be a clear and concise,heresay and "what my mate has" should be left out of it, people search forums like this for the correct answer but unfortunately everybody has different views,you could read this thread end to end and still come to no prooven conclusion, imo vta blow off valves lead to poor idle and stalling issues,the factory recirc wins for me,nissan clearly know more than us lot,any extra stress on a turbo is best avoided- fact. stress is increeced on a turbo when the throttle is closed and the turbo continues to wind and if it does slow it has to be re spooled again ,correct my spelling if you want,noisy bovs are for boy racers imo

Edited by aerofocker

Another note - if you do use a BOV make sure you pipe it so that it goes into the turbo and none of the air feeds back into the AFM otherwise you will get overfueling and potentially stalling when going off boost

Most diesels don't have throttle butterflies either, maybe I should rip that out of mine too...

I have never heard any truck making that gay dose noise so there must be some sort of pressure release?

The VL turbo and XR6t's came with no bov from factory didn't they? All the ones around my place anyway. :(

I don't see trucks running BOVs :down:

Diesels do not actually use a throttle body to control engine rpm...

Most diesels don't have throttle butterflies either, maybe I should rip that out of mine too...

I have never heard any truck making that gay dose noise so there must be some sort of pressure release?

The VL turbo and XR6t's came with no bov from factory didn't they? All the ones around my place anyway. :P

I have only seen 2 XR6t's under the hood and they both had Bosch CBVs fitted...They were stock standard and on display at different motor shows...

As far as the VL turbo is concerned they are a getting quite old now....My first car (Mk1 escort) did not have EFI...does that mean I should fit carbies to my GTSt??

Also, since when do we use Holden as a bench mark for design??

I can not run a stock bov as the after market plenum does away with the stock bov and the traction controll unit.
You can stick the stock bov on the hot side of the i/c - much easier to plumb back that way.

Its not all that hard to fit factory recirculating BOV's into custom piping. I recently mounted factory GTR Bovs in my car. I've used the bovs, the mounting section and the factory 'Y' peice to make things more simple and easy. Not exactly pretty but it works, and well.

I welded a piece of 2.5" pipe into the 2.5" hot pipe just before the cooler, which mounts the BOV's just under the factory airbox location (FRH skirt section). Off them I run dual 36mm hi temp silicone hose back up the the factory GTR 'y' section which then exits into single 2" , which is connected to the 2" pipe now mounted (welded) into my intake pipe.

they work really well, no reversion, very little noise and 'like factory' performance.

sorry the pics a pretty kinda shithouse...

post-47373-1270455535_thumb.jpg

post-47373-1270455567_thumb.jpg

post-47373-1270455596_thumb.jpg

post-47373-1270455649_thumb.jpg

  • 4 weeks later...
I don't see trucks running BOVs :D

You mustn't work on very many trucks.

All of the Diesel turbo trucks my employer uses (200-300 turbo trucks) have a pressure relief valve (BOV) built into the intake piping from factory, an essential piece of equipment to save a $15,000 engine if the wastegate fails to open under extreme operating conditions. (minimum, just for replacing the engine, not even considering downtime and labour)

Replacing a $2000 RB motor fades in comparison of expenses...so you may as well block the BOV off, and sound cool :D Plus, there is no way that the group of engineers Nissan paid salaries for knew what they were doing back in the 90's. :cool:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...