Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just realised... I thought you were going for 2 Bar SuperStar? Why only 24PSi now?

Oh and steve... My 880s on 98 are already hitting 70% dc from the calcs I did... And that was on 14psi only revving to 6500...

  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well the exhaust is restrictive now so a bigger one is needed, the kw's were going up with more boost but not by much cause its choking so instead of stressing it out for every last kw, Yavuz made it safe enough to hammer everyday and turned the boost down.

Also, its pretty much quick enough for street duties as it is so why bother with more. Ive pretty much done what i set out to do on this motor, if i find a nice 4" exhaust thats another tune :banana:

Your fuel system just wont cope, ID's :D

No. I grew up on Oatley Bay and had friends round Connells Point and Kyle Bay. Haven't heard bout the N1 yet ,but Knowing my guys it will be pretty close to landing

Ah cool cool!

That's such an awesome buy, are you keeping it stock or going to town on it? It's a great base to work with :)

Steve... going by the injector sizes im assuming thats on E85?

You assumed correct.

Based on the boost it ended up on, it shouldve stayed pump98 but can be switched over at anytime (did tunes for both, just need to flash the ecu)

Steve, is that torque graph right? Looks to be 730nm...

Yep 730nm at wheels. Tractive effort was sky high, but that's not the number that matters.

Why doesn't it look right to you?

Yep 730nm at wheels. Tractive effort was sky high, but that's not the number that matters.

Why doesn't it look right to you?

i was just questioning the number mate, nothing more :)

my previous gtr with 26bottom end & gtrs's made 750nm torque...my current 30bottom end with -10s makes 930nm.

our kw are almost identical but the nm is very different? maybe my ported made the difference?

would a similar engine setup with e85 @ 24psi (i.e. yours) v's 98 @ 24psi (i.e. mine) impact the peak torque? maybe its just a case that e85 truly works better on higher boost?

Marko do you have more graphs?

I'd like to overlay them and see what differences there are

the only graph i have is here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/post-a235105-

i might have another 1 @ home, let me check later a/h

just to add, 405awkw = approx. 450rwkw (it was 1 of the 1st q's i asked my tuner when it was done on his dyno, my mates who drive fords & holdens always ask "whats kw is that rear wheels?")

Edited by Marko R1

I think the port job would be making some difference but the tune and turbos would play more of a large part.

It's not peak figures I'm looking at, i want to see what they're both making at every 500rpm point so yeah if you've got one and can send it that would be great.

How do you know it's 930nm without a graph though? A lot of people think the N on the side axis is torque, it's tractive effort not torque

jim (tuner) told me that the shown axis on my graph is in fact torque.

i'll see what else i have at home but come to think of it, im 99% sure the other 2 graphs are KW v's AFR & KW v's PSI

sorry steve, this thread is about your car & not mine :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
    • Any idea where I can get genuine MAF apart from used ones? I can't find any only for GTRs and unfortunately that price is not in my budget 🤣 I might gap my plugs down and put my splitfires in, they were only in for a year or so before I started the rebuild 
×
×
  • Create New...