Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

PJ....that R34 with the stock bottom end and stock cams....what was the power at the hubs? Im presuming the dyno run is showing corrected power at the fly? Im in the UK and I want to run a single on my Forged RB26 in my R32 GTR (Stock head and cams). Im going with a T3/T4 topmount manifold and was looking at the 6262.....I want 500BHP at the hubs at no more than 25PSI.......is this gonna be do-able with the 6262? Im looking for spool compariable to uprated twins but with the ability to crack 500BHp at the wheels. What do you reccomend guys??? Exact turbo specs please?

Oh.......why all the reference to 4 Cylinder Nissan engines and even worse Toyota engines??? Surely you guys must be all running 6 cylinder RB's in the main???? Just find it a little strange as in the UK where im from there isnt a lot of skyline interest in 4 cylinder mills....its all RB26/26/30 etc.......

Cheers

Andy

Is it a T3 or T4 manifold, you cant have both.

Is it a T3 or T4 manifold, you cant have both.

Now you can!

They are making manifolds with flange plates which have the bore of a T3 and the footprint of a T4 with the bolt holes for both.

Sounds OK. Flexible :)

Your in the UK arent you Andy B?

In OZ we measure actual energy at the output point. Thus if we are on a Hub dyno we are measuring energy at the hubs and if we are on a Chassis dyno we are measuring energy at the wheels.

Obviously the hub dynos read a little higher as the wheels sap a little energy away on the chassis dyno.

We normally want to know what sort of power we are putting to the road, it is a good indicator of the cars performance. Take our fabled Commonwhore V8's for example, some of the older LS1 models rolled out of the factory with something along the lines of 280kw (flywheel rated), yet you chuck them on a dyno and should be pleased if you have 200rwkw.

Yanks are also guilty of calculating flywheel HP through a chassis dyno or similar, sort of misleading IMHO. I would rather know what sort of energy I put to the road than what sort of energy I could theoretically put to the road lol

Guys,

Estimating Flywheel power is comon here in the UK and yes, I agree its a load of BS. Power at the wheels is where its at. Im surprised the PT 6262 mande nearly 500BHP ATW..........................

i saw that sound performance in the US were testing the 6266 on a stock motor/w kelford cams 3.0 ltr 2JZ with a cast manifold it made 748 whp and 730 tq @ 29 psi on E64 and say they can squeeze 800whp out of it with more boost. He did one pull on pump gas also and made about 530 whp @ under 20 psi

6266.... What's the specs on that? It's bigger than the 6262 I presume??

its a newer wheel from precision thats for the 67 and 62 turbos , spools for example 6766 spooled better and picked up 35 hp over the 6765

some more info about it and price on the Sound Performance site 899 US dollars for the normal journal bearing one

spracingonline.com/store/Precision_62mm_CEA_Billet_Turbo_6266

here is the dyno sheet from the stock motor 3.0 ltr 2JZ using a 6266

MarkCook11024x768.jpg

Here is a comparison between a 6765 and a 6766

299736_2240601587792_1630643829_2220817_1240013805_n.jpg

Edited by R32GTR/Iceland

That looks great but has anyone put one of these on a 26?? I see loads of high boost RB30 examples but I wanna see a 26 ..... Not running on E85.... Just pump gas . Can anyone post up such results? A good turbo on a 26 with std cams and pump fuel should be able to make 500whp well under 2 bar......spooling at less than 3500 and making full boost by 4500........ Anyone???

some more info on a 6266 on a Supra / 2JZ

amazing results !

Craig's Supra:

Precision 6266 CEA Billet .81 A/R

3.4L Stroker with 9.5:1 CR

Kelford 274 cams

Built but UNported Head

Hypertune Intake Manifold

Approx 683whp/590wtq and crossing 300ft-lb @ 2900rpm on SP's mustang dyno. @ 18.3 psi

770whp/700wtq @ 24 psi

843 whp wtq @ 29 psi

300wtq @ 3000rpm

Peak Torque @ 4800rpm

Peak Power @ 5300rpm

Steady Power through 7800rpm redline

959 RWHP and 941 TQ on a 6266 with nitrous !!! Boost hit 38 psi then fell to 29 where it actually makes peak hp. 125 shot of nitrous.

bush_843whp844wtq29psi.jpg

6266 with nitrous

CraigBush5.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...