Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Made 286rwkw from 5558 on stock mani low mounted 98 fuel, boost 18psi dropping to 16. Told tuner to push it to 20-22psi but intake temps getting too hot. He said forward facing plenum will help cos it doesnt run along radiator and over exhaust cams as stock piping layout.. Its cold beside battery tray but heats up the next few centimeters.. Oh man that damn 300rwkw

Made 286rwkw from 5558 on stock mani low mounted 98 fuel, boost 18psi dropping to 16. Told tuner to push it to 20-22psi but intake temps getting too hot. He said forward facing plenum will help cos it doesnt run along radiator and over exhaust cams as stock piping layout.. Its cold beside battery tray but heats up the next few centimeters.. Oh man that damn 300rwkw

water injection mate...wel done anyways.

cheers

darren

Good work Ron!

How does it feel on the road? Does it compare to the 335kw machine you went in?

Also, who tuned it? JEM?

First impressions- L-A-G----- boy its as doughy as f**k, maybe at 60% of the stockers response up till 3500rpm, after that its coming coming then 4000rpms WHOA BANG it fkn grenades like a rocket, not much difference in seat of pants feel to the 336rwkw car, feels almost, say 90% as mad when boost is on its on! Skates and wheelspins a bit but not too mad, its awesome but the lag is just way too much, I havent driven a ' proper turboed' car so cannot judge, when I come back frm my overseas trip on Jan, u can drive it and gauge Jase, love it but the lag sucks, theres no power below 3200rpms... Is this how its suppposed to be?? 2990rpms=60kw, 3790rpms=120kw, 4720=225, 5470=260kw, 6660rpms=286rwkw

Good work Ron!

How does it feel on the road? Does it compare to the 335kw machine you went in?

Also, who tuned it? JEM?

First impressions- L-A-G----- boy its as doughy as f**k, maybe at 60% of the stockers response up till 3500rpm, after that its coming coming then 4000rpms WHOA BANG it fkn grenades like a rocket, not much difference in seat of pants feel to the 336rwkw car, feels almost, say 90% as mad when boost is on its on! Skates and wheelspins a bit but not too mad, its awesome but the lag is just way too much, I havent driven a ' proper turboed' car so cannot judge, when I come back frm my overseas trip on Jan, u can drive it and gauge Jase, love it but the lag sucks, theres no power below 3200rpms... Is this how its suppposed to be?? 2990rpms=60kw, 3790rpms=120kw, 4720=225, 5470=260kw, 6660rpms=286rwkw

Cant upload dyno graph from iphone in the dyno results thread damn.. Anyways fullboost 18psi around 4000rpms and drops to 16psi from 5700rpms, JEM are awesome, ADAMs a top guy definitely recommend him really goes out of his way to help and explain, takes his time to go through detail by detail :)

First impressions- L-A-G----- boy its as doughy as f**k, maybe at 60% of the stockers response up till 3500rpm, after that its coming coming then 4000rpms WHOA BANG it fkn grenades like a rocket, not much difference in seat of pants feel to the 336rwkw car, feels almost, say 90% as mad when boost is on its on! Skates and wheelspins a bit but not too mad, its awesome but the lag is just way too much, I havent driven a ' proper turboed' car so cannot judge, when I come back frm my overseas trip on Jan, u can drive it and gauge Jase, love it but the lag sucks, theres no power below 3200rpms... Is this how its suppposed to be?? 2990rpms=60kw, 3790rpms=120kw, 4720=225, 5470=260kw, 6660rpms=286rwkw

sounds a little bit laggier than my old GTST with a 3071R on it... mine was tuned at 20 psi... see attached dyno

the different is the PT will have a lot more in it! chuck it on e85 :P

post-44179-0-96211700-1355835945_thumb.jpg

First impressions- L-A-G----- boy its as doughy as f**k, maybe at 60% of the stockers response up till 3500rpm, after that its coming coming then 4000rpms WHOA BANG it fkn grenades like a rocket, not much difference in seat of pants feel to the 336rwkw car, feels almost, say 90% as mad when boost is on its on! Skates and wheelspins a bit but not too mad, its awesome but the lag is just way too much, I havent driven a ' proper turboed' car so cannot judge, when I come back frm my overseas trip on Jan, u can drive it and gauge Jase, love it but the lag sucks, theres no power below 3200rpms... Is this how its suppposed to be?? 2990rpms=60kw, 3790rpms=120kw, 4720=225, 5470=260kw, 6660rpms=286rwkw

I wonder how that would compare to a standard G3 type B... For on road feel anyway.

Get the sheet up when you can, I would love to see it.

Hi guys,

I've been following this thread with quite a bit of interest and thought I'd share some info on my project.

I running an FJ20det which I swapped from my old DR30 skyline into my 1600. The previous turbo setup used a Fantasy split pulse single waste gate manifold and a twin scroll GT3071r and made 265rwkw on 22psi.

I have since built my own twin scroll manifold with twin waste gates for the 3071r. I have also built a manifold for a Vband in and out Precision 5558 which a friend of mine sources from PJs Quick Bits. I will be doing a back to back test of both these turbos on my FJ in the next few weeks and will post the results.

Cheers

image_zps71e55f96.jpg

Awesome that will be interesting, what fuel and engine spec? That Precision turbo should have a big edge on potential for power advantage but may need to be pushed harder than 22psi to prove it's extra lag is worth it

The engine has been rebuilt with forged piston and port work to the cylinder head. Cams are still standard. I will definitely run som proper boost through the 5558 as that's what they are made for!

I currently run two maps and I will have both tuned for each turbo set up. One for pump 98 and the other for pump 98+water injection provided by an aquamist HFS3 system. Made 295 rwkw @ 28 psi using pump 98+water injection with the 3071r. This is compared to 304 rwkw using c16. I can't speak highly enough of the water injection and once you have set up and tuned it, it's cheap as chips to run. 30 rwkw when ever you want for under a grand fitted and tuned! Can't argue with those results!

I dont think it is.

that's not why I questioned it lol, look at the power he made. 295kw. Given that he also said water injection = free 30kw, a 3071R would make 265rwkw on 18psi without hassle. Not 28psi lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...