Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have seen dyno sheets floating around which are probably in this post somewhere anyway - which show the difference in the response between, 6266, 6466,6766 being about 500rpm on a 3.4L ...

I have even emailed precision directly who have confirmed that it would be about 300-500rpm on a 3L

Thanks. Have seen it but not sure on that one. I think the 6262 is the one.

Thanks. Have seen it but not sure on that one. I think the 6262 is the one.

Yeah just give it a ago they are pretty interchangable apparently.

I went for the 6466 as I figure if worst case it was 600-700 difference in response from the 62-64 - something i doubt im really going to notice when its on an engine which will snap the rpm needle within a matter of seconds anyway - which is worth it considering the top end gains!

  • 2 weeks later...

Is anyone running a 6266? How much lag are we talking about between the 6262 and the 6266? Can't decide on what to go for. If the RPM difference is negligble i'd be more inclined to go with the 6266 for the potential to make more power at a later date. (Both turbos with 0.84 Twin scroll)

Looking to make 400kw on a RB26 with all the basic mods. Will a 6262 make that power on 98pump fuel (say no more than 25psi)? I've seen that SimonR32 made 420 but that was on flexfuel.

Edited by RRP1

I actually made 450kw and trust me there is plenty more in it but I ran out of fuel pump.

I wouldnt be suprised to see another 30-40kw if I ran 25psi but as you said that is on e85.

6262 is a nice balance for decent power and not too much lag. I was tossing up between it and the 6266 and went the smaller. I think I made the right decision

Edited by SimonR32

no probs....i dont think there will be too much difference to be honest but i cant find the wheel sizes for the 6266

6262 is as below tho

Compressor-

Wheel Inducer: 62mm

Wheel Exducer: 82mm

Turbine Wheel -

Wheel Inducer: 72mm

Wheel Exducer: 62mm

i think i did read that the exducer of the 66 was slightly bigger but dont quote me

PTE 6466 - for anyone looking at this turbo.

Compressor Wheel 2.535" (64.39mm) inducer / 3.410" (86.61mm) exducer

Turbine Wheel 2.920" (74.17mm) inducer / 2.600" (66.00mm) exduce

HKS T04Z:

Compressor Wheel:

T04R/T04Z, Inducer 66.7mm, Exducer 84mm.

Turbine:

T04 P trim, Inducer 74.2mm, Exducer 64.6mm

Garrett GT3540R/GT3582R/GT35R:

Compressor Wheel:

56 trim GT40, Inducer 61.2mm, Exducer 82mm.

Turbine:

84 trim GT35, Inducer 68mm, Exducer 62mm,

for comparison..

Alot of guys are running the 6466 in favour of the 6266 in the states and report no change in spool/response but more power up top.. Would like to see some results on RB26 though.

Edited by RRP1

So how do people reckon a PT6466 would compare with a Garrett T04Z in overall performance? Would you be able to use the Precision in the Garrett's place and expect to make similar (or better) power on pump gas on a suitably built engine?

PTE 6466 - for anyone looking at this turbo.

Compressor Wheel 2.535" (64.39mm) inducer / 3.410" (86.61mm) exducer

Turbine Wheel 2.920" (74.17mm) inducer / 2.600" (66.00mm) exduce

HKS T04Z:

Compressor Wheel:

T04R/T04Z, Inducer 66.7mm, Exducer 84mm.

Turbine:

T04 P trim, Inducer 74.2mm, Exducer 64.6mm

Garrett GT3540R/GT3582R/GT35R:

Compressor Wheel:

56 trim GT40, Inducer 61.2mm, Exducer 82mm.

Turbine:

84 trim GT35, Inducer 68mm, Exducer 62mm,

for comparison..

Alot of guys are running the 6466 in favour of the 6266 in the states and report no change in spool/response but more power up top.. Would like to see some results on RB26 though.

6466 only comes in ball bearing tho which is all good but cant justify the extra cash for it

So how do people reckon a PT6466 would compare with a Garrett T04Z in overall performance? Would you be able to use the Precision in the Garrett's place and expect to make similar (or better) power on pump gas on a suitably built engine?

i dont think you can go wrong the PTE to be honest

So how do people reckon a PT6466 would compare with a Garrett T04Z in overall performance? Would you be able to use the Precision in the Garrett's place and expect to make similar (or better) power on pump gas on a suitably built engine?

Should make plenty more power without being too much laggier from what I have seen

Thats interesting, I'd have hoped for it to be at least as responsive!

Well my 6262 is better than my old T04Z but not the miracle that some would lead you to believe. The 6466 is a fair wack bigger (195hp rated), I doubt you would be getting that for nothing :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...