Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6466 + stroker = loves it. Ignition breaking down over 29 pounds so this was the limit. I think it will do for now. :)

What's redline on this?

Looks like it will want to break things. Lots.

I want one.

Well had the exhaust done, did not pick up much power but it helped where I wanted it, response.

since I changed the Turbo,Cams and Exhaust the car has gone from a pig to drive to being fun, enough up top and good bottom response,street drive :)

Here is the latest Dyno

New Dyno 345.4 KW

Red = Boost off

Blue = Low Boost

Orange = High Boost

Old T78 = 337.9KW

That is a significant different there in where peak torque is made, good job.

Poor old T78 :) Did you end up getting my PM?

Epic result Mitch must be an animal?

That on a 3.4L?

Is it in an R?

She's a beast on the road, i love it more and more each time I drive it.. Yep 3.4L kit in my R34 GTT.

What's redline on this?

Looks like it will want to break things. Lots.

I want one.

Upped the limiter to 8000 now. Peak power is at around 7400. The whole driveline has been upgraded so here's to hoping it doesn't break anything!

  • 1 month later...

That is a significant different there in where peak torque is made, good job.

Poor old T78 :) Did you end up getting my PM?

Hi Micheal

Sold the T78 and the bloke is happy, crap it was just about new, well 5 years ago and only 3000Klms on the car since it was installed

No I did not get your PM as it would come in on this Laptop, it does not allow me to gain access to anything other than threads and posts, but better than nothing. If you would like get me as TT350GT I can access everything on my PC.

I have caught the Mod bug and going to have the RB30/Nitto 3.2 Stroker kit shoved into it, keeping the PT6262 may get a bigger back housing and go for response, it is a DD and I want it to be what I thought it was when I bought it.

I have to say that since the last modifications I got to love it but need more and might have to come out of retirement to pay for it,bloody cars ,haha

post-134126-0-12817500-1404283972_thumb.jpg

post-134126-0-39452800-1404284021_thumb.jpg

I have caught the Mod bug and going to have the RB30/Nitto 3.2 Stroker kit shoved into it, keeping the PT6262 may get a bigger back housing and go for response, it is a DD and I want it to be what I thought it was when I bought it. I have to say that since the last modifications I got to love it but need more and might have to come out of retirement to pay for it,bloody cars ,haha

Haha, that's great :D can't wait to see how it turns out!

  • 2 months later...

does anyone know if precision will release a gen 2 6766 or a tubo slightly bigger than a 67 but still retain twin scroll, as anything larger than a 67 seems to be only able to be bought with a single entry rear housing.

7175? Or FP Super94 :P

  • 2 months later...

OK so the Precision PT6870 CEA is out now - from the initial testing it is serious serious serious business, ultra impressive.

See here: http://www.supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?859938-PTE-6870-CEA-GEN2-Test-Results-by-Sound-Performance

PT7275 versus PT6870 (all testing on the same engine setup):

7275div981010whpvs6870811059whp_zps5ba3a

PT6766 versus PT6870

676681949whpvs6870811059whp_zpsb7426611.

Spool comparison:

PT6870SpoolComparison_zpsa6432d6b.jpg

Those dyno results are all "max effort" on a good motor and high ethanol percentages, so likely to do them all justice. The spool and the relative power versus the 6766 and 7275 impress the hell out of me, nuts.

Yep, quite interesting. All results were impressive, though that particularly made me think of the GTX3067R result someone on here got.

Not sure if referring to my GTX3067 result, or typo, but nonetheless also found the results of 0.81 v 0.96 very interesting.

Below quote from the original page in particular:

The .96 A/R only added lag and if you reference the boost spool comparison below, we also weren't able to see as much boost with the duty cycle all-in. This tells us that we were at a limitation of the compressor wheel flow itself and not because of back pressure.

Not always beneficial to go larger A/R it seems.

Anyways, sorry to digress from subject of thread. Thanks Lithium for posting above info.

Keen to max out a 6870! Hopefully they release divided housings for them sometime soon. Certainly looks good on paper, gotta love those GST yankee figures as always :)

6766 rated to 935hp, makes 949hp atw.

Yeah those numbers seemed high for a 6766 on a Mustang, though I am still shocked that people are taking hp ratings as some kind of gospel. How much did you make atw on your old GT3076R? And what are GT3076Rs rated at?

The 6870 is certainly looking the goods, no matter how you slice it. Would have loved to have seen FPs Super94/99s on more things - they are in T4 twin scroll and imho until this came along the best thing since sliced bread for the ">6766 power without going BIG frame".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • yeah first and reverse is where you will find clutch release issues (whether hydraulic or mechanical) because the difference in revs required is the highest there; particularly changing down from 2nd to 1st when still moving. To be clearer though, it is possible that the clutch release bearing is the wrong height. This is less likely than a hydraulic issue but it is not unheard of when you are mixing and matching
    • Quite right, if you make it to that pension you deserve every cent
    • Hi all, Restoring r33 series 1 rb25det. All the heater hoses were on their way out, have replaced them and put it all back together. After testing I noticed a small leak from behind the head on the actual metal water line to the turbo when cars warm. I tried running a longer hose over it but it kept leaking...   I am about to take the (stock) manifold off again😔 to change the water line does any one have any lines they recommend? I was looking at Aeroflow Turbo Oil & Water Line Set but not sure what everyone else recommends. Car is completely stock but want to upgrade turbo eventually. it looks like ill have to disconnect a lot just to replace these lines so if there's anything else recommended to do please let me know. Thank you in advance!
    • From memory, on the R33 GTSt at least, while everyone says "It's not adjustable", I found when I changed clutches in mine, it just needed a small adjustment on the rod length. But be very wary here, as you could end up trying to push the pushrod in the master too far, or blowing out the slave.   Most likely though, if the master/slave isn't bypassing internally or leaking out, then the throw out is the wrong height compared to the fingers on the clutch, so when it moves to disengage the clutch, it isn't 100% disengaged. You can check part of this out too by jacking the car up, having the engine running, put your foot on the clutch and try to engage 1st gear. If it goes in pretty easy (Compared to the ground) and/or the wheels start turning a fair bit and it takes a bit too much brake pedal to bring them back to a stop, this is likely the issue.  I'm not sure if you can adjust the height of the forks etc in these though, it's been that long since I've touched any RB gearbox.
    • That's all good, I thought I was missing some interesting feature! Maybe @PranK can double check if that is something that is meant to be operating or not.
×
×
  • Create New...