Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6466 + stroker = loves it. Ignition breaking down over 29 pounds so this was the limit. I think it will do for now. :)

What's redline on this?

Looks like it will want to break things. Lots.

I want one.

Well had the exhaust done, did not pick up much power but it helped where I wanted it, response.

since I changed the Turbo,Cams and Exhaust the car has gone from a pig to drive to being fun, enough up top and good bottom response,street drive :)

Here is the latest Dyno

New Dyno 345.4 KW

Red = Boost off

Blue = Low Boost

Orange = High Boost

Old T78 = 337.9KW

That is a significant different there in where peak torque is made, good job.

Poor old T78 :) Did you end up getting my PM?

Epic result Mitch must be an animal?

That on a 3.4L?

Is it in an R?

She's a beast on the road, i love it more and more each time I drive it.. Yep 3.4L kit in my R34 GTT.

What's redline on this?

Looks like it will want to break things. Lots.

I want one.

Upped the limiter to 8000 now. Peak power is at around 7400. The whole driveline has been upgraded so here's to hoping it doesn't break anything!

  • 1 month later...

That is a significant different there in where peak torque is made, good job.

Poor old T78 :) Did you end up getting my PM?

Hi Micheal

Sold the T78 and the bloke is happy, crap it was just about new, well 5 years ago and only 3000Klms on the car since it was installed

No I did not get your PM as it would come in on this Laptop, it does not allow me to gain access to anything other than threads and posts, but better than nothing. If you would like get me as TT350GT I can access everything on my PC.

I have caught the Mod bug and going to have the RB30/Nitto 3.2 Stroker kit shoved into it, keeping the PT6262 may get a bigger back housing and go for response, it is a DD and I want it to be what I thought it was when I bought it.

I have to say that since the last modifications I got to love it but need more and might have to come out of retirement to pay for it,bloody cars ,haha

post-134126-0-12817500-1404283972_thumb.jpg

post-134126-0-39452800-1404284021_thumb.jpg

I have caught the Mod bug and going to have the RB30/Nitto 3.2 Stroker kit shoved into it, keeping the PT6262 may get a bigger back housing and go for response, it is a DD and I want it to be what I thought it was when I bought it. I have to say that since the last modifications I got to love it but need more and might have to come out of retirement to pay for it,bloody cars ,haha

Haha, that's great :D can't wait to see how it turns out!

  • 2 months later...

does anyone know if precision will release a gen 2 6766 or a tubo slightly bigger than a 67 but still retain twin scroll, as anything larger than a 67 seems to be only able to be bought with a single entry rear housing.

7175? Or FP Super94 :P

  • 2 months later...

OK so the Precision PT6870 CEA is out now - from the initial testing it is serious serious serious business, ultra impressive.

See here: http://www.supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?859938-PTE-6870-CEA-GEN2-Test-Results-by-Sound-Performance

PT7275 versus PT6870 (all testing on the same engine setup):

7275div981010whpvs6870811059whp_zps5ba3a

PT6766 versus PT6870

676681949whpvs6870811059whp_zpsb7426611.

Spool comparison:

PT6870SpoolComparison_zpsa6432d6b.jpg

Those dyno results are all "max effort" on a good motor and high ethanol percentages, so likely to do them all justice. The spool and the relative power versus the 6766 and 7275 impress the hell out of me, nuts.

Yep, quite interesting. All results were impressive, though that particularly made me think of the GTX3067R result someone on here got.

Not sure if referring to my GTX3067 result, or typo, but nonetheless also found the results of 0.81 v 0.96 very interesting.

Below quote from the original page in particular:

The .96 A/R only added lag and if you reference the boost spool comparison below, we also weren't able to see as much boost with the duty cycle all-in. This tells us that we were at a limitation of the compressor wheel flow itself and not because of back pressure.

Not always beneficial to go larger A/R it seems.

Anyways, sorry to digress from subject of thread. Thanks Lithium for posting above info.

Keen to max out a 6870! Hopefully they release divided housings for them sometime soon. Certainly looks good on paper, gotta love those GST yankee figures as always :)

6766 rated to 935hp, makes 949hp atw.

Yeah those numbers seemed high for a 6766 on a Mustang, though I am still shocked that people are taking hp ratings as some kind of gospel. How much did you make atw on your old GT3076R? And what are GT3076Rs rated at?

The 6870 is certainly looking the goods, no matter how you slice it. Would have loved to have seen FPs Super94/99s on more things - they are in T4 twin scroll and imho until this came along the best thing since sliced bread for the ">6766 power without going BIG frame".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • (it is a brand new ported mellings pump) I suspect the lack of pressure is due to the leak. It was *not* that low in other logs of oil pressure in the past. It wasn't that hot either, but not far off.
    • Would a Mellings oil pump be a viable option  From my time with a LS, and talking to tuners and LS specialists, the "weak" OEM oil pump is one of the first things they recommend to swap out if I was going to give the engine any high RPM I opted for a Mellings high volume, with the high pressure springs and I never had a issue with it Cost wise they are not expensive in the scheme of things 
    • Just bought a 2002 Stagea 250tRS VR-X Four AERO VQ25DET and spent the last two weekends cleaning and detailing it.. still have to do the wheels and the engine bay but the rest of it came up nice. Imported 2011 to S.A. and I'm the third owner since it was imported. I met the guy who brought it over, he went to Japan and picked out the car, bought it and ordered the wheels. He also gave me a list of stuff he did to the car with receipts. Coil overs (I have the original springs), 3" exhaust from the dump pipe back no cat, Custom dump pipe,(I have the original exhaust), Plenum spacer, 18" custom Work XSA wheels (need restoring, I've made a start..), Shift kit put through the 5 speed tiptronic auto, TV and menus/screens changed to english, Australian DTV tuner installed in rear. I've just had four new discs and new pads as well as all the fluids including the brake fluid replaced. I have all the receipts for the last 15 years and the import papers in a nice folder. Car looks great, goes like hell but fuel economy is not a thing lol.. pics next..
    • I ended up in this rut again lol, and used a shit ton of filler. One thing I can't understand is, even after using a big long block and going in long X pattern strokes, I always end up at bare metal again with no filler, and my repair started at one end of the door and now I've chased my tail to almost the other end of the door. I was thinking of hitting the panel with a hammer where it might be a high spot and making everything low then filling it, I did this on a small section on my other door by mistake and I think I fixed it lol. Is this a bad idea? The other thing is with guidecoat, whether it's the powder or spray, after I sand all the guide coat off, it doesn't reveal anything for me in terms of high spots and low spots and makes it especially hard when it's bare metal (at least in powdered form), am I doing something wrong here, or likely a high spot I keep going over and creating valleys? Lastly, stupid question but, is it possible that after sanding if I only sand over the filler area where I know to be a dent that it's impossible for me to dig into that dent? Unless there are other problems which I missed.  
×
×
  • Create New...