Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Opinions on a 6466 w/ .84 TS on a built 2.6 with 272/272 10.2mm lift cams?

I have poured through this thread, and as such was leaning towards the 6262 or even considered the 6062 Gen2 thats just been released - but my engine builder is telling me the 6466 is 100% the go

I trust the workshop, but just want to double check other's results; dont want something that comes on at 5k or later.. id rather it come on hard at 4.2-4.5k rpm

Its concerning seeing people say a 6466 outflows a T51R

A rb30 usually adds about 500rpm response all things equal... My cams are bigger than yours, so you could possibly base it off that. I'm using a 1.0 divided housing.

I don't think it will be bad, certainly better than a T51R in response, even if it does flow more top end. Thats the beauty of new technology.

If you're worried about response though your are probably better off with a smaller turbo, unless you have a power figure you definitely want. Take into account the 6466 is a 600awkw turbo

Depends on car use, I'd be giving a 6062 a go if your stuck between the 6262 and 6466 for a decision. It should sit right in the middle in response and power :)

I try and do everything with my car from tight sprints, circuit work,1000m drags and powercruise etc. and the 6262 is right in the sweet spot of power and response. I actually turn it down 140hp for everything apart from powercruise and drags because it's more than enough. What do you want from your car?

A 6466 is going to be responsive for its size but it's getting towards drag car only power band on a 2.6L, if that's what you want then go for it but your never going to keep up with the Jones's.

What would you guys recommend for. Street drag VL, auto re401a

Forged Rb30 NEO head

270 9.2mm cams

Plenum etc etc 3k stall

Currently running gt35 .82 internal gate

22psi 422hp but out of injectors

98ron

I was looking at the 6466

6466 1.0 divided.

I make 433awkw on 22psi, 98

100kw more on e85

Should be plenty to run 9's

It's been a while but here is my Dyno sheet from build

Rb26 precision 6262 at 19 psi.

Car is running good other than its smoking from turbo.

Anybody here using restrictors? I just put a .030 restrictor and stopped smoking but not sure if I should drive it.(n1 pump)

EC990DBB-75E3-4453-89C1-EC9B0C5E4339_zps

Thanks for the quick reply guys. Haven't removed the factory restrictor. I'm running a -4an feed line and a -10 am drain line. Drain line is pretty straight down with now kinks. I also did a leak down test and compression test on the engine. Got 128 psi on all 6 cyl.(running 8:3:1 CR) and dry leak down test was 10% on al 6 but #1 13%. Not sure what other options I have

I'm getting 45psi. Pressure at 2.5-3krpms and over 60 psi from 4k up

Edited by silvianc

Is that America?

because that is epic power in Australia for that boost

Lol yeah. I'm in the U.S.

Setup made

390hp@9psi

450@11psi

560@15psi

611@19psi

This is on a 2.6, 87mm pistons and Tomei type B cams, t4 .84 divided housing and limiter on 8400 Rpms but u can see dyno sheet actually was 7.8k Rpms

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=773329676088103&id=142284982525912&_rdr

Our horses are angrier

It's been a while but here is my Dyno sheet from build

Rb26 precision 6262 at 19 psi.

Car is running good other than its smoking from turbo.

Anybody here using restrictors? I just put a .030 restrictor and stopped smoking but not sure if I should drive it.(n1 pump)

EC990DBB-75E3-4453-89C1-EC9B0C5E4339_zps

Hell yeah. I'm in the USA too. Here I am thinking of seeing 550 whp on pumpgas and I'm at sea level and I'm on a stroker motor. Heck I may see 650 whp on pump after seeing this !

Hell yeah. I'm in the USA too. Here I am thinking of seeing 550 whp on pumpgas and I'm at sea level and I'm on a stroker motor. Heck I may see 650 whp on pump after seeing this !

You'll probably see 550 Australian horses if you've been looking at our graphs. More if in USA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...