Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

Ive been reading about power bands lately, and its apparently quite important to know your cars when it comes to racing especially in the case of a naturally aspirated car.

My question is, how do you know what your power band is? Is it just drive and feel it for yourself or does each car have a power band that any common car owner can tell you?

I've also wondered about when racing, is it best to shift out of first at say 4 rpm and then build the revs in the higher gears or is it better to rev it higher in first? I feel like when I rev high in first im not really getting as much power as if I let it rev in second, and I just feeling the wrong thing?

I've never actually looked at the speedo while testing all this as im worried about keeping my eyes off the road.

Any help is greatly appreciated, one of my friends beat me in his celica the other day and all the stats show that my car should have won if my technique was better, so im trying my best to better understand everything.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/
Share on other sites

The RPM where you feel your car pulling is where the power band is. Look at horsepower and torque curves (dyno graphs) on google and you will see exactly what a power band looks like. You will want to launch your car with your engine revved such that after the clutch grabs the needle drops to around the RPM where the torque curve for your car shows it is a constant level (not where it is rising steeply) so you get a strong pull at takeoff. Does that make sense?

High revving lower displacement engines such as VTECs have the peaky power (in the top end of the RPM range) but larger displacement N/A engines can have more torque in the low end too (i.e. Nissan 350z/370z).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/#findComment-5219785
Share on other sites

having been on track on 2 stroke road bikes i can tell you changing gears is pretty much the same no matter what your in/on. you want to shift from first into second only when doing so will result in more acceleration, for 99% of vehicles this means changing at redline. with actual 2 stroke machines with proper powerband, changing early can result in having almost no power as they often only make any real power in the top 20% of their rev range. as to a good launch, as much as it may kill your clutch, to do a perfect launch on the bike i would simply give it full throttle at take off and slip the clutch out keeping the revs at around 12k (where the bike its max power). not 100% on doing this in a car but definitely the way to go on the bike.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/#findComment-5223193
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

i've read in a couple of places that the powerband can be shifted by changing cams or using cam gears, how does this work?

when it comes to changing gears, it depends when your car falls off its power band, this may be at 6500, or (more likely) much higher, like 8000rpm.

think of the power curve of the engine, you always want to be accelerating as hard as possible, so if you change at 4000rpm you're missing out on 4000-7000rpm goodness, which is where most of the power is. theoretically, the higher the rpm, the more explosions per second, the more power, but all sorts of efficiency issues get in the way. still, higher rpm = higher power. in f1 when they want to dial back the power to save the engine/fuel, they turn it's redline down.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/#findComment-5266924
Share on other sites

Generally - the larger the cams, the more revs are needed to get the engine to make power e.g at set of 280deg 11mm lift cams on an RB25DE would need 4500-5000rpm before it started to make power, below that the airflow through the ports is very slow and inefficiant, So you then need to rev the engine harder eg 9000rpm redline in order to have a decent power band, if the engine only revved to 7000, you would only have 2000rpm where the engine makes any grunt, so each time you changed gear you would drop out of the power and go no where.

Think of big cams like you would a big turbo...kinda

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/#findComment-5266947
Share on other sites

i've read in a couple of places that the powerband can be shifted by changing cams or using cam gears, how does this work?

when it comes to changing gears, it depends when your car falls off its power band, this may be at 6500, or (more likely) much higher, like 8000rpm.

think of the power curve of the engine, you always want to be accelerating as hard as possible, so if you change at 4000rpm you're missing out on 4000-7000rpm goodness, which is where most of the power is. theoretically, the higher the rpm, the more explosions per second, the more power, but all sorts of efficiency issues get in the way. still, higher rpm = higher power. in f1 when they want to dial back the power to save the engine/fuel, they turn it's redline down.

also you are missing out on 3000rpm of accelerating in a lower gear with an easier ratio. that is where the argument of "what rpm to change gears at" starts to get a bit more complicated. a simple view is to change gears the moment you get past the peak power output. what this doesn't take into account is that even though the power may be dropping off, it may still be higher than at the rpm you will be at in the next gear. and then as i said above, the more time you spend in the lower gear (within reason), the easier the car will accelerate, especially when you are talking about the higher gears. that is where each car needs to be evaluated individually to see what works best. i know that in the case of the missus SSS pulsar, with the stock headers it would start to choke around 5500rpm, and it was pretty much pointless to rev it past 6500rpm. put on a set of extractors and it doesn't start to choke until about 6500rpm but will still pull all the way to the 7500rpm redline.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/#findComment-5267237
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Driveability will be about the same with either externally venting BOV, or no BOV at all. Perhaps worse one way than the other, with me thinking that the definitely more flow going through the AFM through a venting BOV more likely to cause rich stalls than the perhaps more flow that the AFM might read on reversion. There is no such thing as "turbo damage" from not having a BOV at stock, or even quite a lot higher than stock, power levels. You need a big turbo with a lot of mass spinning hard getting a horrible slowdown from a slammed shut throttle before there is anything like the shaft loads required to damage things. Not an issue on small turbos. The ONLY 2 reasons that Nissan put a recirc valve onto the RB were: It is a bypass valve. It is open when under vacuum. When not on boost, it bypasses intake air forward around the compressor, which unloads the compressor, allowing the turbine to sping more freely, making the whole lot a bit more efficient when just puddling around. Throttle response should also be faster via the shorter, smaller diameter BOV pipe (when in NA, ie before the BOV closes and boost is building) which is nicer for driveability. Emissions. The reversion causes CO pulses. Eliminate the reversion (or at least, keep it away from the AFM) and you don't get that. The stalling/driveability aspect could have been tuned around, as shown one example of by dose above, if Nissan hadn't put a recirc valve on. Many many turbo engines before the RB had no BOV. They did not stall. See the RB30 turbo as an example. Nistune is definitely better than just stock ECU. It allows you to access and change things that are not excellent on the stock setup, and allows you to do mods like put decent injectors in, relocate the AFM, put a bigger turbo or even cams, etc, on, change to coil swith completely different swell needs, etc etc. All the things that you might need or want to do 25 years after the car was new. Aftermarket replacement ECU is obviously better again, because it gives you even more freedom from the constraints of the stock ECU. I won't be needing to go any further than Nistune though, for the new turbo in the 250ish rwkW region I'm going to, with big injectors, and most other things being stockish.
    • Lucky the prp block is supposed to be released next weekend 
    • Wow guys thank you very much for the HUGE info :-) @GTSBoy I have like 30 minutes if test drive with that car/engine and it not stalled once. IMO it ran very smooth so i guess it was not that bad(but asi i said it is stock) That atmo BoV is worse than no BoV or in my case or it is/will be the same? Cuz frankly i rather have little whooosh sound than that sututu 😄 But either way the less harmfull for engine/turbo the better(if the stock is not an option right away) Yeah about that rebuild i talk with guy who will be doing swap and custom pipes...i think i can get stock BoV or get aftermarket which will function the same. Yeah i looked at that R35 option and i try ask my mechanic more about that if he knows. The engine has stock ECU but i can get Nistune for it. On that stock it runs quite well...but i have limited time with it so rly dont know. Ecumaster is this https://www.ecumaster.com/  It is not some dodgy backyard ECU :-)  @MBS206 Yeah but it will be better to have Nistune than the completely stock ECU no? About that "same" atmo/no BoV. The drivebility would be the same? I dont know but i kinda guess that amto BoV would cause more problems than no BoV in my case? Or is the same? You just "change" one sound for the other? Yeah i read many many many topic about hurting the turbo. But no one know anybody that would 100% tell that his turbo/engine blows/get damaged by not running BoV. Of course turbo would be little happier IMO if it has BoV ..but if you do not trash i think i should be good. And as you can see iam already trying to get this right...just working what i have right now :-) Yeah iam kinda the same...i dont want nothing loud and frankly iam not liking that sututu noise that much 😄 i rather have little bit of "whooosh" or no sound at all. Of course in my case it si a completely another world when you came tu Turbo car with open air box and no BoV and you driving the N/A ...all i hear is engine. Here? I heard turbo/sucking and that sututu 😄 @Yeetus So in my case it is really no difference to run no BoV or some atmo BoV like GReddy FV2? The car would drive the same and has "the same" little problems? As i wrote above i kinda thinked that atmo BoV with stock MAF would cause more problems...but then again i dont know much about no BoV either :-)  So to avoid stalling i "cant" just put neutral on stop lights like from higher rpm? Or? Yeah iam already looking for ECU :-)  Yes iam at the same side with thar R35 MAF :-)  @Dose Pipe Sutututu Thank you i (my mechanic/tuner) will look into that) Guess iam taking the Nistune at least :-) 
    • Here's the workaround with Nistune I was talking about, just add in more timing on the decel table And play around with the fuel cut & recovery, it's enough to stop it from stalling on a decel  
    • Hi Apex and welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...