Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

8cms here... worked head stock capacity built 26... 360rwkw @ 20psi... running 21-22psi now not dynoed tho... I'm the T517z on the dyno comparo Ash posted... the Garretts are a much better choice if prices are similar... the Trust turbos are really old truck tech... they hit hard though and will last forever (mine are 8+ yrs old) and cheaper to rebuild should you have to

Hard as they would go with stock head?

Heads not stock, 260 x 9.15 cams and ported and polished.

I have personally seen this car make over 400kw on 3 separate dynos. At the last Time Attack here in SA it was place in the top 3 all day with the exception of the last session. It is making the power.

Edited by D_Stirls
  • 1 year later...

I stuffed a 2530 installing it in my gtr. It took 8 weeks and 1350 to repair. I told them to get f**ked because I was originally quoted up to two weeks and only 400. Went to mtq and got a brand new one for 1350 in two days they also confirmed the cost of repairing as the same. So if anybody thinks they can repair a 2530 for cheaper then that I have a brand new one for sale cheap as f**k just has a f**ked thread on oil feed line hahaha

Is that really all they are capable of with 10cm housings?

Yeah.... it was as hard as they would go on my set up. Stock head (drop in cams), stock exh manifolds, 98 and turns out a questionable exhaust.

I'd take my t517z's over -5's any day.

Only reason I took them off.... I upgraded to bigger twin 'truck' trust turbo's (td06 L2's)...

Garrett sucks..... Trust is awesome!

Awww come on... The little garretts ain't that bad.

Got a graph?

It's a bit rough to say that when Jack did a back to back and the "crappy Garrets" out performed the Trust turbos.

he he he...

The garretts are a pretty good choice....

I ran my T517Z's 7 years ago- they were the best option for me at the time. No graph.

They may out perform on a dyno... but it's hard to argue with 138mph in a full weight r32. havn't seen many -5 cars run those sort of numbers on a stock motor in full trim?

I don't like -5's the same as I don't like 'itard- Apple' products....

So many stories of wayward Gayretts. Have you popped any? I remember at one point you wre looking at grabbing one of Fatz?!?!?

I would say 2-3 out of 5 people I know running Gayretts have had troubles and needed replacing. Both singles and twins.

If you want response go and buy a BB 68 Camaro with screw blower on it! :) Go the Truck turbos. At least when they hit they test the strength of your seat back :)

I have had a few new Garrett's running high boost levels, the main issue with BB cores is they require good clean filtered oil, most of the failures I have seen relate to oil quality issues and oil restrictor blockages.

Bush cores are more resilient to contamination but also require much more oil flow or they will flog out quickly.

So many stories of wayward Gayretts. Have you popped any? I remember at one point you wre looking at grabbing one of Fatz?!?!?

I would say 2-3 out of 5 people I know running Gayretts have had troubles and needed replacing. Both singles and twins.

If you want response go and buy a BB 68 Camaro with screw blower on it! :) Go the Truck turbos. At least when they hit they test the strength of your seat back :)

My issue was that I stripped a thread putting everything back together. My own fault. Silly Pig!

No no, I'm honestly curious.

138 MPH is hard to argue with, I agree!!!

Why don't you like the -5's? Don't make enough grunt?

-5's are like assholes or iPods..... everyone's got them. They're power delivery is a bit soft for me... they do produce boost sooner, but don't seem to produce 'push in the back' torque any sooner or as much.

T517Z's put a smile on my face in '05.... -5's didn't.

I love turbo cars for the rush of torque when your on the boil... I spent years after trying to chase my ass with the 'ultimate response/power' set up. But when I sat back, stripped it all back and reminded myself why I love my car/s.....

So I started building something that would put a smile on MY face and who gives a siht what any body else thinks.

... what I ended up with is a 2.8, twin billet Trust td06, nitrous injected, dog boxed GTR that makes me crap my pants :yes:

J.

-5's are like assholes or iPods..... everyone's got them. They're power delivery is a bit soft for me... they do produce boost sooner, but don't seem to produce 'push in the back' torque any sooner or as much.

T517Z's put a smile on my face in '05.... -5's didn't.

I love turbo cars for the rush of torque when your on the boil... I spent years after trying to chase my ass with the 'ultimate response/power' set up. But when I sat back, stripped it all back and reminded myself why I love my car/s.....

So I started building something that would put a smile on MY face and who gives a siht what any body else thinks.

... what I ended up with is a 2.8, twin billet Trust td06, nitrous injected, dog boxed GTR that makes me crap my pants :yes:

J.

A lot of people have them, no doubt. It's all in the setup though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I might just check it out.. A Q among all those skylines.. lol
    • Time will tell, they're doing all the admin stuff at the moment. I've submitted all the required details, photos, etc.   I was under the impression that DC coupling is the best approach, i.e.: Solar Array -> Battery Invertor -> Battery  Where as AC Coupling is simpler, however less efficient, i.e.: Solar Array -> Solar Invertor -> Battery Invertor -> Battery
    • The price is really great for that kind of capacity. I thought similar setups cost way more. How's your efficiency been with the DC-coupling? I've heard sometimes there can be a bit of a performance loss.
    • Long time no random post about shit. So I went down this deep deep rabbit hole of battery storage for the home, ended up locking in a 41.9kWh Fox ESS EQ4800 with 9 units stacked. Battery uses Lithium Iron Phosphate, similar to what you find in those deep cycle boat/caravan batteries. And yes, why did I go with a cheapie brand and not like Synergy? simply because I don't plan to stay at this house for more than another 3~5 years.  The entire install, DC coupling (removal of existing invertor, connecting the current 6.6kW array direct to the battery invertor), new 8kW invertor is $6K all up (after all the rebates etc.). Going with this lot: https://www.aussiesolarbatteries.com.au/ It did seem a bit too good to be true, however seems like the Whirlpool community has vetted it and when it comes to this kind of stuff, they seem to be all over it: https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/thread/9pxj8482?p=38   I've requested for the battery to be installed outside, next to my meter board and not inside - rather have it combust and ignite outside lol.    
    • In Vic it would be a defect regardless of whether or not you cut a hole in the sheetmetal for the return pipe. The rules in Vic are shitful, and are generally interpreted as you can "make 2 mods to the intake system". Putting an FFP and an FMI onto it will almost certainly be seen as some huge number of intake mods. You really need to speak to an engineer before doing this stuff in VIC.
×
×
  • Create New...