Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You make yourself look silly by making wild assumptions... sit back and wait for a result.

As for this thread; looking forward to seeing a result from this early in the new year!

I understand that I might look silly by arguing about silly things but..

The ONLY wild assumption around here is that the GTX3582R would be laggier than the GT3582R. It just doesn't make any sense, given the advantages of the wheel. That is a VERY wild assumption.

I understand that I might look silly by arguing about silly things but..

The ONLY wild assumption around here is that the GTX3582R would be laggier than the GT3582R. It just doesn't make any sense, given the advantages of the wheel. That is a VERY wild assumption.

No one has ever said that a GT35R would be laggier that a GTX... Hence you are a douche!

No one has ever said that a GT35R would be laggier that a GTX... Hence you are a douche!

That's not what I said. migmikespec is claiming the GTX is laggier than the same GT:

You must still be a student and have not been out in the "real world" if you believe everything on a data sheet, come on now!

I will raise both eyebrows if a physically bigger comp. wheel (from a GTX35) will respond the same as a standard GT35 at the same power.

I am with the striped horse! :)

I won't call u a douche for not seeing it tho :rolleyes:

Edited by bradsm87

Take the first of the T88-38gk's they had a billet comp wheel, then they went to the cast wheel...any difference....maybe 100 on an Insane RB or JZ, real world...no difference

Borg Warner have been using billet comp wheels for yonks yet no-one has said they are any better than the previous ones

SimonR32 is right; never said it was laggier... I just said it would be surprised if it responded the same at the same power. Is has a larger compressor wheel (shown in catalogue) and hence a higher moment of inertia.

You have no idea what the weight is so you should not comment... maybe it is the same weight or heavier? If that is the case and it responded the same, as I said I would be surprised.

  • Like 1

SimonR32 is right; never said it was laggier... I just said it would be surprised if it responded the same at the same power. Is has a larger compressor wheel (shown in catalogue) and hence a higher moment of inertia.

You have no idea what the weight is so you should not comment... maybe it is the same weight or heavier? If that is the case and it responded the same, as I said I would be surprised.

Yeah but 0.5mm isn't gonna do shit. I wouldn't call that larger. I'd call that the same. Just like with GTR twins, a -9 comp wheel is 59.4mm and a -7 is 60mm. they're the same size. U don't call something 0.5mm bigger in turbo talk bigger. It's the same. There are so many other variables that make the 0.5mm in diameter insignificant.

  • 4 weeks later...

ok so the car is still in the shop........ but thought id throw up a few teasers

Photo0096.jpg

Photo0091.jpg

MANIFOLD ONE:

09-11-10_1333.jpg

MANIFOLD TWO:

P021210_0255.jpg

note that the first manifold sat too close to the strut tower so the turbo was fouling, and now the 2nd manifold is really close to the rocker cover.

also something to note is that both of the exhaust manifolds had to be modified ie grinded/cut on the bottom in sections by Ovaboost because an rb25 manifold will foul on the rb30 block!

you can also see that ovaboost have moved the tensioner to above the water pump

hopefully have dyno results soon!

Edited by Char

spot on mate, ovaboost already had a go, telling me they only want to work with 6boost manifolds/steam pipe,

mostly its because i was impatient and a 6boost manifold would have taken another month + $1400

i had the 2nd manifold machined straight and had the welds/runners checked and modified if needed, but these manifolds are typical for overboosting

i will be getting a 6boobs manifold, likely after the engine has been run in -one to suit my T04Z plans

i rang the shop today, nothing new to report since the compression test, still waiting for some custom fab work. -also im not sure if they sussed a way to close the bonnet

Build a package - every part is to suit another for the power goal.

RB30's are dime a dozzen.

Go the 87mm, why not, every little bit helps. Your only after 450rwhp.

555cc's - up the pressure slightly they will be fine.

Drop the rear down to a .86, there's no need for the 1.06 for 450rwhp especially considering your running 555cc's. It will only introduce more lag and you'll be depressed when something with less hp kicks your arse.

450rwhp - drop a .5 comp cover on it with the .86 rear, perfect match excellent mid range and some very nice response in first and second. Matching GT30 territory but with an additional 30-40rwkw.

Ford did a lot of testing with the .5 front cover, its a very nice match for a GT35R streeter on 98 pump looking for 350rwkw.

What about a clutch, 450rwhp+ will need a considerably better clutch than a good exedy single plate.

Consider the package, don't over do one area only to under do another.

Your running a plenum, be sure not to shove in a set of cams, it will rev want too hard and you will spiral in to the $ of ATI balancers and forged rods, if you don't you'll rev her too hard and whats that KNOCK KNOCK KNOCK, oh sh$#T, maybe thicker oil will fix it... no it won't. :)

In short.. Aim for 450rwhp don't over do it and it will be a cheapish package. Over 400-450rwhp and it starts getting expensive quickly. ATI balancer, high rpm, bigger injectors, cams, porting, more lag but more rev's, double/tripple place clutch then you start stripping gears in the ol' rb25 gearbox, then there's the traction issue that WILL present its self of which again will make you depressed as some one with considerably less HP WILL kick your arse... see where I'm heading.

EDIT: Shove some forward cradle rake in to it - it will make the world of difference to the way it hooks up.

Edited by Amoreuxi

Build a package - every part is to suit another for the power goal.

RB30's are dime a dozzen.

Go the 87mm, why not, every little bit helps. Your only after 450rwhp.

555cc's - up the pressure slightly they will be fine.

Drop the rear down to a .86, there's no need for the 1.06 for 450rwhp especially considering your running 555cc's. It will only introduce more lag and you'll be depressed when something with less hp kicks your arse.

450rwhp - drop a .5 comp cover on it with the .86 rear, perfect match excellent mid range and some very nice response in first and second. Matching GT30 territory but with an additional 30-40rwkw.

Ford did a lot of testing with the .5 front cover, its a very nice match for a GT35R streeter on 98 pump looking for 350rwkw.

What about a clutch, 450rwhp+ will need a considerably better clutch than a good exedy single plate.

Consider the package, don't over do one area only to under do another.

Your running a plenum, be sure not to shove in a set of cams, it will rev want too hard and you will spiral in to the $ of ATI balancers and forged rods, if you don't you'll rev her too hard and whats that KNOCK KNOCK KNOCK, oh sh$#T, maybe thicker oil will fix it... no it won't. :)

In short.. Aim for 450rwhp don't over do it and it will be a cheapish package. Over 400-450rwhp and it starts getting expensive quickly. ATI balancer, high rpm, bigger injectors, cams, porting, more lag but more rev's, double/tripple place clutch then you start stripping gears in the ol' rb25 gearbox, then there's the traction issue that WILL present its self of which again will make you depressed as some one with considerably less HP WILL kick your arse... see where I'm heading.

EDIT: Shove some forward cradle rake in to it - it will make the world of difference to the way it hooks up.

What a top post.

Great information

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...