Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering about something that I do whilst driving an auto.

When I'm stopped at the lights, or somewhere for for an extended period, I change in to neutral. I have always done this with autos, because I thought that it would cause less wear on the box and breaks than to keep it in drive whilst stopped. However I've never done any research to prove this theory.

Does anyone know if this would be true, would it make any difference?

What do other people do?

Cheers,

Dave-

Edited by bayslideblue
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/334913-auto-driving-techniques/
Share on other sites

At a complete guess, with no evidence to back it up, wouldn't constantly be changing to and from neutral be causing more wear than leaving it in drive?

I just leave it in drive, always have with auto cars, never really put much thought into it it though to be honest

Most certainly does cause more wear. Everytime a gear is engaged there is a small amount of slippage in the clutches and bands. Selecting neutral all the time means reselecting first gear everytime. Most boxes the clutch for all forward gears stays engaged the whole time.

If any one needs a "mint" condition auto box for an s1

mine will be available shortly

doesn't slip or flare,like brand new....perfect...

I Always leave it in drive,I never flip thro the gears trying to break something

:):blush::geek:

I also put it in nuetral

I always remember old shitty auto's vibrating away when stationary - Nuetral always stopped the vibrations

Mines nowhere near that atage but I thought that by putting it nuetral at lights it was way of avoiding that problem

However I can see the logic behind extra wear and tear - as every gear change causes this

wouldn't constantly be changing to and from neutral be causing more wear than leaving it in drive?

Yeah I was wondering about that, I thought that it could possibly cause more wear changing from neutral to drive more often than nescesary.

Alright I guess I'll leave it in drive from now on.

Cheers

What about using the tiptronic function all the time. Is that more likely shorten the gearbox's life?

It wouldn't be there if you weren't meant to use it..

I use tiptronic pretty much everywhere and I drive hard, even with all the flaring that used to go on on the 1-2 change, when I had the mild shift kit put in, the guy said the box was squeaky clean inside!

I also put it in nuetral

I always remember old shitty auto's vibrating away when stationary - Nuetral always stopped the vibrations

Mines nowhere near that atage but I thought that by putting it nuetral at lights it was way of avoiding that problem

However I can see the logic behind extra wear and tear - as every gear change causes this

hmmm, the reason for the vibration is because the revs were too low, and the engine wasn't idling properly. Putting it in neutral lifts the revs...and the problem goes away. Nothing to do with the auto at all.

I've spoken to a few auto transmission specialists (I normally try to extract as much info as I can when I go in for a service...yeah one of those annoying customers...but hey i'm paying for it), and they all pretty much say that modern automatics work best when you just leave them in drive and let them work it all out. The computer in the auto is probably as complex as the one for the engine, and it knows what to do in any given situation. Most auto boxes have stuff programmed in to protect the box no matter what happens.

Having said that, its fine to use tiptronic too. As has been said already, if it was bad for the auto, they wouldn't put the tiptronic mode in. Obviously the harsher you are with it the more it will wear...but under normal use there's no problem at all.

As for putting it in neutral...have a think about it. Autos are all electronically controlled these days - so if it was better for the box to go into neutral when stationary - it would do that by itself. The fact is, its completely unnecessary, and you may as well just leave it in drive because that's what they're designed to do.

Actually...

Some modern transmissions do shift into neutral when they sense the vehicle is not moving... All in the name of extracting better fuel consumption...

Actually they shift into second gear, to stop vehicle squat.

Actually...

Some modern transmissions do shift into neutral when they sense the vehicle is not moving... All in the name of extracting better fuel consumption...

lol I would love to know what difference it actually makes to fuel consumption. I'm guessing it wouldn't even be measurable.

if your that worried DON`T DRIVE IT ,

:D

Not really that worried, was just a habit of mine and I was curious to find out which would be better.

Besides I guess the quicker it wears out, the sooner I will be contemplating a manual conversion.

lol I would love to know what difference it actually makes to fuel consumption. I'm guessing it wouldn't even be measurable.

When I had Falcon and Commonwhore hire cars, I could see the trip computer drop by about 0.1 or 0.2 l/hr from drive to neutral.

Has to make some tiny difference as you are no longer sloshing around the fluid in the torque converter... I think this is one of the reasons why CVTs have such good fuel consumption, as they actually have a clutch pack that completely disengages whilst stationary...

In the UK people who have driving lessons in autos are taught to move the transmission into Neutral and apply the handbrake when stationary, as this is what you would do in a manual vehicle. Prevents accidents caused by people who might accidently take their foot off the brake pedal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...