Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What physical driving characteristics would be noticed( or other aspects) between

the VQ25DET engine and Neo VQ25DET engine in a M35 Stagea 2002

"a NEO engine is classified as a low emission vehicle (LEV) engine due to their

lower fuel consumption and emission output. The NEO head featured solid lifters

rather than hydraulic, revised camshafts and a revised inlet manifold, in particular

the RB25DE NEO which had 2 inlets going into the inlet manifold. The combustion

chamber of the head is smaller, so GT-R spec connecting rods are used to compensate.

The turbo received the larger OP6 turbine."

What physical driving characteristics would be noticed( or other aspects) between

the VQ25DET engine and Neo VQ25DET engine in a M35 Stagea 2002

"a NEO engine is classified as a low emission vehicle (LEV) engine due to their

lower fuel consumption and emission output. The NEO head featured solid lifters

rather than hydraulic, revised camshafts and a revised inlet manifold, in particular

the RB25DE NEO which had 2 inlets going into the inlet manifold. The combustion

chamber of the head is smaller, so GT-R spec connecting rods are used to compensate.

The turbo received the larger OP6 turbine."

Is there a NEO VQ25DET available ??

Scott, you really are naughty speaking so derogatorily of your ancestors.

BTW the H20 was used in TCM Forklifts.

Looks like I asked the wrong question.I guess thats why we have forums .

Whats the difference between a motor being a Neo and Non Neo motor

Edited by samuri

actually SRs sound like trucks. especially when they have VTC rattle.

anyway, the neo vvl is variable cam timing, duration and lift unlike the VTC equipped engines that were only variable cam timing.

The older neo engines just switch on a set degree on the intake at certain revs.

Ours can run anywhere between, constantly variable, but you can only adjust it with the Vmanage or a remap. Hopefully one day...

CVTC makes the engine a bit smoother, neo rb's have a dip in power as the cam switches in looking at the graphs.

neo rb's have cvtc

its the r33 rb25's that have the on/off vct

Ah right, so ours may use a very similar system, I was hoping to get a Vmanage some day to allow me to adjust the cams in limp mode. :( Then I can install the cable throttle again...

doesnt the emanage ultimate have nissan VTC output??

i remember my emanage blue had one for my SR20. mind you it made sweet FA difference if i changed the cams to come on earlier. turns out the factory setting was perfect for that engine!

Yep, it has a switch output (for Vtec etc?) but cant control the cvtc without the Vmanage.

Scotty , is that an aftermarket aerofoil of sorts on the rear roof area of your car,and if so where did you get it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...