Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello guys,

I have been reading through many threads on little ways to get increased performance from a stock cooler a skyline.

There are many theories including removing panals etc. I thought we should put all the ideas on a single thread.

If you have any great ideas for stock cooler performance lets hear them!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33542-more-flow-from-the-stock-cooler/
Share on other sites

For Performance?

Throw it out.

For a small upgrade, water spray is the only really worthwhile thing

cost vs effort vs result that i could think of.

Moving it to the front & re-piping it is useless unless you can do it in your spare time.

Paying for it to be done is a waste.

Even though your paying for it with your own time though really when you think about it.

well i was told to take the plastic cover from the passengers wheel arch off so help the flow. So i did. Dunno if it makes a difference. I guess u could make up a plastic scoop of some sort to grab the air and direct it through the cooler. S15's i know of have this system, maybe something to think about. But yeah i dont think there is much u could do. Maybe the most effective thing to do would be unbolt it and clean it out with degreaser or something and let it dry in the sun. Get the oil film outta it

I always thought if u attached some good sized heatsinks to the outside of the intercooler that may help dissipate the heat that it generates a bit? Very ghetto mod though, but wonder if it would work? Works on a CPU :worship:

The only way it can perform better is by improving the flow to the core and adding a water spray.

Even than it is a flow restriction once the boost in increased to around 12psi so not really worth the time to play with if you are running muchover stock boost.

Why not plumb oil through it and use it as an oil cooler, then mount a nice big front mount and plumb it up to the turbo and inlet manifold.

Alternatively fill the std intercooler with cement and stich a piece of chain into in before it sets (should make a great boat anchor)

- remove and clean out thoroughly with some sort of degreaser

- Cut a hole in the perforated plastic panel behind it (removing it entirely makes the front bar a little less stable)

- make up a plastic surround to channel (force) all of the air through the core.

- definitely don't mount it at the front, waste of time and you'd look like an idiot :worship:, also it will actually get better airflow in the stock pposition where air can flow "through it" and out the back

- as mentioned, a good upgrade (& cheap) is an r34 gtt intercooler.

the panel at the back and the ducting is a good idea. The cooler is pretty crappy in design, it's size isn't too bad tho'. The R34 intercooler is slightly larger but suffers from the same crappy end tank design and core, should work a little better all the same.

instead of water spray, why not mount a small electric fan behind it to suck air through (ie a fan from a motorbike)... cheap although probably most effective at helping the intercooler cool off ffrom heat soak, rather than reducing the intake temp

- remove and clean out thoroughly with some sort of degreaser

- Cut a hole in the perforated plastic panel behind it (removing it entirely makes the front bar a little less stable)

- make up a plastic surround to channel (force) all of the air through the core.

- definitely don't mount it at the front, waste of time and you'd look like an idiot :(, also it will actually get better airflow in the stock pposition where air can flow "through it" and out the back

- as mentioned, a good upgrade (& cheap) is an r34 gtt intercooler.

i agree wholeheartedly with the above however, the best material for making a duct to surround the IC is 1mm aluminium sheeting. it is quite easy to work with & cheap when you ask for offcuts.

instead of water spray, why not mount a small electric fan behind it to suck air through (ie a fan from a motorbike)... cheap although probably most effective at helping the intercooler cool off ffrom heat soak, rather than reducing the intake temp

Speaking as someone with no idea; this one sounds good. Anyone else think so?

Speaking as someone with no idea; this one sounds good.  Anyone else think so?

No :D

The fan would push less air through the core than the airflow at 60kph

Great when sitting in traffic but then the fan would be a restriction once you start moving again :Oops:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh ok that makes so much sense. Thanks for clearing it up!
    • And these modern "environmentally friendly" EV vehicles also run on the same smoke! When the engine, wiring, or batteries let it escape it also stops running!
    • Yeah - I found the same information too.. 30% open is like 85% of flow etc. So it's probably going to be minor if not completely imperceptible. I also have a larger pod filter here, will swap that on and see if there's any difference. The hardest part is finding a place to uh, test this. It's quite noticable just how much having ducting to the otherwise completely open pod cools the intake temps down. It's better boxed, or shielded but driving for 30 seconds really makes it plummet to near ambient temperatures. I recall in the past when I was a RB land and had a nice flowing airbox -  - Then I took the lid off and put a pod there, and gained 9 psi of boost and about 60kw from the restriction I didn't know I had - with the controller at same duty cycle. However finding people using over the radiator intakes having similar KPA drops at WOT on built setups makes me think there restriction could be the exhaust or potentially the headers. Either way though, there's no real estate to play with and nothing that can realistically be done about it. The original dyno plot without the airbox, and the larger pod had a better curve. It was later I added the ducting and airbox, and a smaller pod to make it fit in there...
    • That's not completely truthful now is it? Any flex fuelled factory cars also had the option to run on steam.
    • Yeah so I guess your mechanic would know turnaround better than me....but I would have thought you had access to same day or overnight rack rebuilds there....any big city here in Australia has that service.   There are a couple of o-rings and seals involved, I guess the risk is the part is specific not general. Other option is if you can have it on stands in your garage for a while, steering rack removal is pretty simple (2 mounting brackets, 2 ball joints (separate by undoing the nut to the top of the threads, put a pry bar between the steering arm and control arm to put pressure on it then medium force on the side of the ball joint or top of the nut with a hammer to break it free) and then the trickiest bit is the splines to the steering rack (not too bad to undo, one nut then it slides out, but mark it first so you can reassemble it straight)
×
×
  • Create New...