Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

from what I've read to keep the pistons cool, the quicker than move about the more friction & heat it will cause right?

richening up the tune up the top will keep the pistons/rings/ring lands in tack but this sacrifices power output.

and from what toshi has said before and after cat, yes there is a difference, I've had my car on a dyno and the A/Fs were different to what my wideband was reading (pre cat).

Most tuners are save time/money by tuning at the exhaust tip, but I don't believe that's the best way to do it.

I personally have pumped in extra timing after MBT, for my old setup it was around 5600rpm, and the timing for row 17 read something like

Row vs Timing 10/13 11/13 12/13 14/13 15/14 16/14 17/15 18/11 19/11 20/11

did you heck this on a dyno to see if it made an improvement?

im puttin my car on the rollers tonight to see how my street tuning is going, ill try add some timing after MBT and will also richen it up slightly there too.

ill post my results later

I always ask for AFR 11.5 when I go to get a tune. It always comes out at 12.0 or higher. No idea why tuners insist on running leaner for a few percent power and end up with higher temps if you ever use it on the track or highway.

everyone has their different opinions. your workshop might think you've read something on the net and just because of that insist on 11.5. so they ignore you and go with what they think is best.

i'll be doing a little experimenting with afr's and timing when i get my car going. mainly gonna try using a little extra fuel in cells that occasionally knock, but not enough to drop a full degree of timing

(Well the aussies general rule is to tune rbs to a full load afr of 12 and then tweak ign timing to suit for max power where as the japs throw in a shit load of fuel eg 10.5-10.0(keeping in mind that their pump is 100+) and then throw in a shit load of timing on top of that..)

one might say your question is, do you want a sas tune or a crd tune. both very good but both very differant.

what the main reason behind richening it up after what i assume is peak torque?

im guessing just to cool it down a little?

do you add more timing in during the enrichment after 6500RPM

this rb25 has a very big turbo and stock head. it does not make decent power untill around 6k. thats why its like that. to keep it cool when its on heat.

and from what toshi has said before and after cat, yes there is a difference, I've had my car on a dyno and the A/Fs were different to what my wideband was reading (pre cat).

Yes because your $300 wide band is just as good as the Autronic Wide Bands they use on Dyno's. That makes this test very accurate and relevant.

Had a look the other day at one of our "better" tuners on a stock turboed Rb26, 1bar and pfc

From the word go ie. low rpm coming into boost he set afrs to 10.8 to 10.9 all the to limiter...when asked why he said it makes more torque that way

Is it that he is just playing it safe or is he just plain lazy to tweak the timing from the off to on boost transition, from which i understand is a little tricky to get perfect in that area???

At the end of the day it made 360rwhp(dynojet), knock was no higher than 20 and this is on 95 ron

Guilt toy mentioned richen it up on top because of the shit fuel.....u guys would not have a problem as u run 98 but we here with our best being 95 i think the only other way to add some knock resistance it to richen it up a bit....we have an excuse....still not sure about the japs :thumbsup:

I see if a can get the tune for u guys to have a look

Edited by Don Dada
Guilt toy mentioned richen it up on top because of the shit fuel.....u guys would not have a problem as u run 98 but we here with our best being 95 i think the only other way to add some knock resistance it to richen it up a bit....we have an excuse....still not sure about the japs :thumbsup:
They did design and build the cars and have many very fast RB's!!!
where are you exactly? as 95 in the US is the same as 98 in Oz

Nah....not in the US

Our 95 is shit....although running it with the base pfc map at 11psi on the 26 still not produce more than 25-30 knock...Strange!?!

Edited by Don Dada

maybe it is equiv to our 98

ours are labelled RON, US is labelled (RON+MON)/2 i believe.

RON is more of a controlled test rating, whereas MON is tested in more 'real world' conditions i guess you could say.

so what country are you in?

where i am there is no liablility. so the guys working / own the fuel stations can chuck in 100 litres of water into the 98 octane tank to make some extra bucks blow up 200 cars and get away with it without having to pay a cent! if you asked for money they would just laugh at you.

I get soo paranoid that I listen to my engine with k-mon when i change fuel stations just in case they are doing the dodge.

where i am there is no liablility. so the guys working / own the fuel stations can chuck in 100 litres of water into the 98 octane tank to make some extra bucks blow up 200 cars and get away with it without having to pay a cent! if you asked for money they would just laugh at you.

lol you do realise that they get randomly audited for things like that.

LOL my bad, I'm surprised you don't end up with kerosene in your tank half the time!

who knows what they put in there, but there is one fuel station that sells good fuel here, and it has a very very very strong smell.. even stronger then race fuels i have seen.. do not know what additives they are putting inside it.

who knows what they put in there, but there is one fuel station that sells good fuel here, and it has a very very very strong smell.. even stronger then race fuels i have seen.. do not know what additives they are putting inside it.

Uranium? :P

maybe it is equiv to our 98

ours are labelled RON, US is labelled (RON+MON)/2 i believe.

RON is more of a controlled test rating, whereas MON is tested in more 'real world' conditions i guess you could say.

so what country are you in?

Yeh i know the difference.....Definitely 95 ron and i'm as far as u can go south on the Caribbean chain :D

We got some fast shit here too....stuff from Trial, Signal etc and some good local projects too....but they dont seem to last very long >_<

Yeh i know the difference.....Definitely 95 ron and i'm as far as u can go south on the Caribbean chain :D

We got some fast shit here too....stuff from Trial, Signal etc and some good local projects too....but they dont seem to last very long >_<

i seen a few import when i was in the carribean a few weeks back.

i seen a few import when i was in the carribean a few weeks back.

I get soooo exited everytime I see a 'tuned' import in Sint'Maartin, BVI's, St Kitts, Barbados, Trinidad, Jamaica etc... even the Dominican Rep.

My 5000hp MTU's just don't cut it in a big ass superyacht!

Ah man I missssss my GTR!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...