Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Morning all,

2 weeks ago i had my gearbox / clutch replaced and had the guys re-tune the car too as it had been over 3 years since my last tune, with another tuner.

The new dyno sheet showed the car at 193rwkw, which concerned me as my last dyno tune back in 2007 had me around the 220rwkw mark.

When i questioned the new tuner, he put the difference down to the fact others "tweak" their dyno settings to give off false readings. i had heard of people doing this in the past but surely 30 rwkw is quite a large "tweak" in settings. Isnt it?

I gave my new tuner the benefit of the doubt. However, the car feels much slower as turbo response times are now very laggy. At times it feels as if i am driving a NA car as i cant feel the punch of the turbo i once used to feel. The boost just doesnt put me back in my seat like it used to.

The tuner did carry on that the new tune is a "safe tune" but in all honestly the car felt quicker before i even had the Power FC installed.

Now on top of the above, the fuel economy has become very poor. Coming from a minimum of 350km a tank prior to this new tune, my first tank out of the workshop came to 190kms. Keep in mind the driving has been kept rather sensible as i am still wearing in my new clutch.

Am i right in assuming the tune is attributing to the poor fuel economy i am experiencing? Makes me wonder why this is happening as the car is noticably slower too.

Do you guys have any suggestions before i go back to these guys and complain? These guys are very well known in the industry and have a good name so i find it tough to go back to them and complain about their work results.

Current mods are :

3.5" turbo back exhaust

FMIC

K&N Air Filter

Apexi boost controller (high setting at 12 psi)

Walbro Fuel Pump

Power FC

Spitfire Coil Pack

Appreciate any advice guys, as i am at rock bottom at the moment as i have just spent over $3k to have my car eating more fuel and driving much slower.

Thanks

Con

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337864-new-tune-resulting-in-30-rwkw-less/
Share on other sites

It can only be the tune or the car.....either way the dyno is there to tell you. The fuel consumption is not normal so just mention that and take it back to have it checked. The tuner can't fix it if he's not aware of the problem. You may kill two birds with one stone

Do you have a copy of the "old" tune? Then re-install those maps. Or the previous tuner should have a copy.

The economy - check "closed loop" has been turned on.

Driving / performance - maybe it's simply psychological, the number is lower so you expect the performance to be down as well.

thanks for the responses guys.

How do i check if "closed loop" is switched on? is this checked on the PFC hand controller?

AFRS?

BTW i spoke with my tuner breifly this morning and his advice was to continue driving the car for another week and monitor the fuel consumption as it could be a fluke. (sounds to me he couldnt care less TBH)

Edited by CK34GT

193rwkw is bang on for std turbo. mine made 192rwkw with a good tune

your economy should be 350kms to a tank and some dynos will give higher readings

ie moving the air temp sensor is enough to inflate your reading from 190rwkw+ to 210rwkw+ so take it with a grain of salt

and for what its worth your better of making less power and having a quicker car vs havingt more power on an inflated sheet

to check if 02 feedback is on

read the powerfc faq in my signature and use the online emulator also in my signature

if your economy is 190kms to tank its likely 02 feedback is off (turn it on)

Peak power sounds right but if the economy is that bad it is possible it is a sloppy tune hence the lack of response, feeling down in average power. Could take it back or take it elsewhere, bit of a gamble really as we have no idea who the tuners are.

if 02 feedback is working and turned on, you dont need to tune every cell to get good fuel economy

it certainly helps, but its not the be-all and end all if working 02 feedback is ON

if 02 feedback is working and turned on, you dont need to tune every cell to get good fuel economy

it certainly helps, but its not the be-all and end all if working 02 feedback is ON

how lean does the O2 feedback tune it anyway?

193rwkw is bang on for std turbo. mine made 192rwkw with a good tune

your economy should be 350kms to a tank and some dynos will give higher readings

ie moving the air temp sensor is enough to inflate your reading from 190rwkw+ to 210rwkw+ so take it with a grain of salt

and for what its worth your better of making less power and having a quicker car vs havingt more power on an inflated sheet

to check if 02 feedback is on

read the powerfc faq in my signature and use the online emulator also in my signature

if your economy is 190kms to tank its likely 02 feedback is off (turn it on)

From what i can see, i must check the 02H setter and make sure it is switched on right?

and can i change this from my PFC hand controller if it is turned off?

Cheers

193rwkw is bang on for std turbo. mine made 192rwkw with a good tune

your economy should be 350kms to a tank and some dynos will give higher readings

ie moving the air temp sensor is enough to inflate your reading from 190rwkw+ to 210rwkw+ so take it with a grain of salt

That is one area that I agree with. The car shouldnt be returning such a poor fuel economy. I had my gtst with a hi-flow and very similar mods making 230rwkw and I was always getting close to 500km/tank.

Something is not right, I have not the experience or knowledge to say what that is, and I would be getting the tune looked at. Maybe one of the experienced tuners on here could have a look at your tune file if you upload it?

ok just ran down to check the settings on th PFC....

Sensor Check Screen:

I found that only IGN and ECC was on (filled black circle)

Everything else was off (empty circle)

Function Select Screen (as below)

Boost Control, air flow warning, injector warning - OFF

Knock Warning & O2H F/B Control - ON

I dont get it, if O2H in the sensor check was off, why is the O2H F/B Control showing on in Function Select Screen.

How do i actually switch the O2H sensor on in the Sensor check screen - this should likely fix the fuel consumption problem right?

Edited by CK34GT
or most likely the tuner didn't give a rats arse about rows 3-15

This makes sense as only IGN and ECC (line 1 & 2 i see) is turned on and all remaining lines off.

Any thoughts on what this could mean?

What is the importance of lines 3-16 ??

Edited by CK34GT
02 feedback aims for stoich 14.7 by default

you can change it with datalogit

no, you can change which cells are trimmed under constant throttle, not how much they're trimmed by.

OP, he means rows 3-15 in the fuel map, nothing to do with the sensor screen. whilst on that screen tho, what does the o2 voltage show at idle?

for it to be using that much extra fuel just from the tune he'd have to go through every cell and richen them all up and take out loads of timing under light load, which would just be silly but you never know...

Unless the tuner is really SHIT i doubt they would go through and change everything to make it really rich...could be wrong.

Coincidence, but failed Fuel Pressure Reg?

Depending on how they can sometimes fail it could make the thing rich under low load and lean on power...or rich everywhere = sluggish.

Take it back and get them to SHOW YOU while cruising on the dyno that the AFR meter shows either 14.7 or 1.00....shouldnt be anything other than that....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm seeing torque specs all over the place for the OUTER tie rod, but none for the INNER tie rod, where it connects to the steering rack. Even in videos, people are just tightening em up as much as they can with a wrench and that's it. Anything tightened down without torque makes me nervous. Anyone know what the spec is for it?
    • Hope you had a great time here in our tiny country.   The JDM scene we have here is quite small, it's mostly BMW, Volkswagen with burble tunes haha. But the few JDM cars we do have in the scene are pretty nice. Some of my friends drive cool s14's too. Both built engines, red one makes abt 500, blue one abt 400 i think?
    • Ye good idea , would have never thought of something like that. Might aswell do it to every pulley and the balancer while I’m there 
    • Use an LS1 or similar, via kit like Frenchy's. But.... It's probably not the alternator. It sounds like belt squeal, which would be because the pulleys are glazed. Rub every groove on the pulleys with 120 grit paper. Report back. Oh, and new belts afterwards too. The old new ones will be shitted up already.
    • Hello all I have 2 r34 sedans , one turbo one na, only recently aquired the na 34.  Man what is with these things.... My turbo 34 started sounding like a super charger, it was screaming at anything above 4000rpm , I took the alternator apart and replaced the front bearing which is the only one I think you can access and it did not fix the issue so presumably the bearing in the rear of the alternator is gone. ( diagnosed it was the alternator by taking off the aux belts one by one to figure out which pulley or bearing it was )  My friend gave me one he had lying around, Installed it , it did not squeal for maybe 500kms and now its started to squeal again briefly on startup  Recently got an na r34 and I replaced the timing belt, water pump + all the auxillirary belts. Runs amazing but it suddenly developed the same squeaking problem but significantly worse, Ive had my neighbour come down screaming at me because it was waking her up everytime I moved the car. It takes a good 2 minutes before it quietens down.  Im yet to diagnose where its coming from but im fairly sure its coming from the alternator aswell. My question isnt about how to fix it but rather where can you get a new alternator for an rb25 neo??? Ive searched everywhere but I havent been able to find a direct fit oem type replacement thats not genuine. All the automotive stores sell an oex one - BXA035 - which I picked up for cheap through a friend with staff discount , got it home only to find the connector is completelty different.... As far as im aware bxa035 is for rb20/30's and after a bit of figuring out the bxa035 has an ev14 type connector, which is tiny compared to the rb25 connector. I actually had an ev14 connector lying around which I was considering just replacing the bigger plug with to get the alternator working but the bxa035 is rated for 70amp vs the rb25 alternators are 90amp ( or so ive been told ? ) That paired along with the fact im about to install an amp + sub in the back and I have the stock sized small battery Im not sure itll do the job unless anyone has another opinion?  I know and have seen all the websites selling the ls1 alternator conversion kit but I am not going down that route, nor do I have the money to. Hopefully I can figure out how to get 2 brand new alternators for both cars. I would buy second hand which there seems to be many of but considering how common this seems to be im sure If I installed a second hand one it would start squealing in no time  Or even better if anyone knows how to fix the issue directly with the alternator itself... Any input appreciated Thank you     Link for bxa035 connector picture
×
×
  • Create New...