Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Morning all,

2 weeks ago i had my gearbox / clutch replaced and had the guys re-tune the car too as it had been over 3 years since my last tune, with another tuner.

The new dyno sheet showed the car at 193rwkw, which concerned me as my last dyno tune back in 2007 had me around the 220rwkw mark.

When i questioned the new tuner, he put the difference down to the fact others "tweak" their dyno settings to give off false readings. i had heard of people doing this in the past but surely 30 rwkw is quite a large "tweak" in settings. Isnt it?

I gave my new tuner the benefit of the doubt. However, the car feels much slower as turbo response times are now very laggy. At times it feels as if i am driving a NA car as i cant feel the punch of the turbo i once used to feel. The boost just doesnt put me back in my seat like it used to.

The tuner did carry on that the new tune is a "safe tune" but in all honestly the car felt quicker before i even had the Power FC installed.

Now on top of the above, the fuel economy has become very poor. Coming from a minimum of 350km a tank prior to this new tune, my first tank out of the workshop came to 190kms. Keep in mind the driving has been kept rather sensible as i am still wearing in my new clutch.

Am i right in assuming the tune is attributing to the poor fuel economy i am experiencing? Makes me wonder why this is happening as the car is noticably slower too.

Do you guys have any suggestions before i go back to these guys and complain? These guys are very well known in the industry and have a good name so i find it tough to go back to them and complain about their work results.

Current mods are :

3.5" turbo back exhaust

FMIC

K&N Air Filter

Apexi boost controller (high setting at 12 psi)

Walbro Fuel Pump

Power FC

Spitfire Coil Pack

Appreciate any advice guys, as i am at rock bottom at the moment as i have just spent over $3k to have my car eating more fuel and driving much slower.

Thanks

Con

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337864-new-tune-resulting-in-30-rwkw-less/
Share on other sites

It can only be the tune or the car.....either way the dyno is there to tell you. The fuel consumption is not normal so just mention that and take it back to have it checked. The tuner can't fix it if he's not aware of the problem. You may kill two birds with one stone

Do you have a copy of the "old" tune? Then re-install those maps. Or the previous tuner should have a copy.

The economy - check "closed loop" has been turned on.

Driving / performance - maybe it's simply psychological, the number is lower so you expect the performance to be down as well.

thanks for the responses guys.

How do i check if "closed loop" is switched on? is this checked on the PFC hand controller?

AFRS?

BTW i spoke with my tuner breifly this morning and his advice was to continue driving the car for another week and monitor the fuel consumption as it could be a fluke. (sounds to me he couldnt care less TBH)

Edited by CK34GT

193rwkw is bang on for std turbo. mine made 192rwkw with a good tune

your economy should be 350kms to a tank and some dynos will give higher readings

ie moving the air temp sensor is enough to inflate your reading from 190rwkw+ to 210rwkw+ so take it with a grain of salt

and for what its worth your better of making less power and having a quicker car vs havingt more power on an inflated sheet

to check if 02 feedback is on

read the powerfc faq in my signature and use the online emulator also in my signature

if your economy is 190kms to tank its likely 02 feedback is off (turn it on)

Peak power sounds right but if the economy is that bad it is possible it is a sloppy tune hence the lack of response, feeling down in average power. Could take it back or take it elsewhere, bit of a gamble really as we have no idea who the tuners are.

if 02 feedback is working and turned on, you dont need to tune every cell to get good fuel economy

it certainly helps, but its not the be-all and end all if working 02 feedback is ON

if 02 feedback is working and turned on, you dont need to tune every cell to get good fuel economy

it certainly helps, but its not the be-all and end all if working 02 feedback is ON

how lean does the O2 feedback tune it anyway?

193rwkw is bang on for std turbo. mine made 192rwkw with a good tune

your economy should be 350kms to a tank and some dynos will give higher readings

ie moving the air temp sensor is enough to inflate your reading from 190rwkw+ to 210rwkw+ so take it with a grain of salt

and for what its worth your better of making less power and having a quicker car vs havingt more power on an inflated sheet

to check if 02 feedback is on

read the powerfc faq in my signature and use the online emulator also in my signature

if your economy is 190kms to tank its likely 02 feedback is off (turn it on)

From what i can see, i must check the 02H setter and make sure it is switched on right?

and can i change this from my PFC hand controller if it is turned off?

Cheers

193rwkw is bang on for std turbo. mine made 192rwkw with a good tune

your economy should be 350kms to a tank and some dynos will give higher readings

ie moving the air temp sensor is enough to inflate your reading from 190rwkw+ to 210rwkw+ so take it with a grain of salt

That is one area that I agree with. The car shouldnt be returning such a poor fuel economy. I had my gtst with a hi-flow and very similar mods making 230rwkw and I was always getting close to 500km/tank.

Something is not right, I have not the experience or knowledge to say what that is, and I would be getting the tune looked at. Maybe one of the experienced tuners on here could have a look at your tune file if you upload it?

ok just ran down to check the settings on th PFC....

Sensor Check Screen:

I found that only IGN and ECC was on (filled black circle)

Everything else was off (empty circle)

Function Select Screen (as below)

Boost Control, air flow warning, injector warning - OFF

Knock Warning & O2H F/B Control - ON

I dont get it, if O2H in the sensor check was off, why is the O2H F/B Control showing on in Function Select Screen.

How do i actually switch the O2H sensor on in the Sensor check screen - this should likely fix the fuel consumption problem right?

Edited by CK34GT
or most likely the tuner didn't give a rats arse about rows 3-15

This makes sense as only IGN and ECC (line 1 & 2 i see) is turned on and all remaining lines off.

Any thoughts on what this could mean?

What is the importance of lines 3-16 ??

Edited by CK34GT
02 feedback aims for stoich 14.7 by default

you can change it with datalogit

no, you can change which cells are trimmed under constant throttle, not how much they're trimmed by.

OP, he means rows 3-15 in the fuel map, nothing to do with the sensor screen. whilst on that screen tho, what does the o2 voltage show at idle?

for it to be using that much extra fuel just from the tune he'd have to go through every cell and richen them all up and take out loads of timing under light load, which would just be silly but you never know...

Unless the tuner is really SHIT i doubt they would go through and change everything to make it really rich...could be wrong.

Coincidence, but failed Fuel Pressure Reg?

Depending on how they can sometimes fail it could make the thing rich under low load and lean on power...or rich everywhere = sluggish.

Take it back and get them to SHOW YOU while cruising on the dyno that the AFR meter shows either 14.7 or 1.00....shouldnt be anything other than that....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...