Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I am wondering what is the most power someone has made through a standard RB25 intake pipe? (it can be sleeved with pipe)

Mine is currently making 279rwkw and i am wondering if it has much left in it. I am running an apexi pod filter, it can be either airbox or pod as long as its running through the standard intake pipe.

Any help much appreciated.

Thanks guys, i am running a hiflow with the standard comp cover so standard 2.5" intake, so I cant see the value in anything bigger than the factory intake pipe. Tao from Hypergear made 302rwkw using the same turbo but with a 3" metal intake pipe so I am just curious to hear some other real world results. I am hoping for 290rwkw.

Run 3inch intake pipe. Will make better power, response, and keep the turbo cooler. You will find metal sleeve does all sort of strange things. 60rwkws difference on mine, It did not work for me.

Run 3inch intake pipe. Will make better power, response, and keep the turbo cooler. You will find metal sleeve does all sort of strange things. 60rwkws difference on mine, I did not work for me.

Thanks Tao, I know your advice and I do value it.

I dont see the difference between:

pod > 3" afm > 3" pipe to 2.5" turbo inlet

pod > 3" afm > 3" pipe to 2.5" pipe to 2.5" turbo inlet

The only difference is that the standard pipe reduces to 2.5" (same size as turbo inlet) 8 cm earlier.

I understand completely if the turbo inlet is bigger than 2.5" but I just cant see the logic yet. If I lost less than 10rwkw I would accept that as my engine bay looks completely factory with a pod (my intercooler is also very hard to spot).

Oh well we will find out next thursday if it will max out.

I was recommended by unigroup to upgrade the intake...

i did make good power so i suppose it must have helped.

Thanks for your experience, only difference is you are running a turbo with a 3" inlet so using the standard intake would be an obvious reduction in diameter (2.5"). Also it just wouldnt fit.

I just made an 80mm alloy intake for GTR 26 on his 34gtt, it will be interesting to see the gains on his 3076 once Trent tunes it, I think the stock rubber intake maxed around the 270 mark.

Bigger is better for the suction pipe, and a good bell mouth into the turbo helps.

Interested in this myself.

I'm currently running 250rwkw on the standard pipe and have always wondered if it's upto the job. It's been reinforced with some pvc piping but there's a pretty nasty bend in it and the bend isn't reinforced.

Having less length of the 2.5" piping will increase flow and i'm sure the aftermarket piping will have a smoother internal make up and most important a smooth bend whilst not collapsing at all under vacuum.

I wonder if changing the pipe will bring enough difference to require a retune as that's whats holding me back from changing the pipe (and a couple other higher priority items i want to replace).

Interested in this myself.

I'm currently running 250rwkw on the standard pipe and have always wondered if it's upto the job. It's been reinforced with some pvc piping but there's a pretty nasty bend in it and the bend isn't reinforced.

Having less length of the 2.5" piping will increase flow and i'm sure the aftermarket piping will have a smoother internal make up and most important a smooth bend whilst not collapsing at all under vacuum.

I wonder if changing the pipe will bring enough difference to require a retune as that's whats holding me back from changing the pipe (and a couple other higher priority items i want to replace).

I made about 30 kw more with mine so yes, you should definitely get on the dyno at least to check afr's top end.

Cheers mate - What engine/setup was that on i.e. Your vq or on an rb motor?

Yeah thought the tune would need to be tweaked... i might leave it then as i'm pretty happy with the power anyways. When i do change it eventually i'll do it at the same time with a forward facing plenum and a retune to suit.

WOMG DOSE!

Edited by Touge Kyousou
Cheers mate - What engine/setup was that on i.e. Your vq or on an rb motor?

Yeah thought the tune would need to be tweaked... i might leave it then as i'm pretty happy with the power anyways. When i do change it eventually i'll do it at the same time with a forward facing plenum and a retune to suit.

WOMG DOSE!

Mine is VQ25det, but flow into a turbo doesnt change with engine type. Suction pipe size is important as the air isnt compressed like Stao mentioned, its at less than atmospheric pressure so less air travels down a 3 inch intake pipe than the turbo can blow down a 2 inch, good power gains to be made there.

3" alloy hard pipe, split the stock rubber intake down the middle, then wrap it over the alloy pipe. As long as you cut it correctly and use an extra hose clamp it will look factory.

I'd also run a stock air box with some 'slight' modifications to cut down on the fuuuully sizacccc 'dose' sound.

J.

Edited by XRATED

Cheers for the info. Good idea on wrapping the factory pipe over an alloy one too, hrmm!

I was looking at getting a silicone intake pipe in black though so should still look fairly harmless, and being silicone shouldn't make noises anymore hektik..

Ahh on a vq. I agree on no difference with air going down the turbo however the factory design of the intake pipe between an br25 and a vq25 would be vastly different i'd daresay e.g. one is happy to flow decent whereas the other may not. E.g. on my v35, that intake pipe had a large and a smallish resonator tee'd off for NVH whereas a skyline from the 90's probably wasn't as focused on NVH. Damnit, now i'm looking at intake pipe, plenum, and retune blargh! (i'll do it later)

I just made an 80mm alloy intake for GTR 26 on his 34gtt, it will be interesting to see the gains on his 3076 once Trent tunes it, I think the stock rubber intake maxed around the 270 mark.

Bigger is better for the suction pipe, and a good bell mouth into the turbo helps.

That will be very interesting, if you could update this thread with the results that would be great! :(

Yeah if those bellmouth things make more hp I can see the benefit of having a larger intake pipe immediately from the turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
×
×
  • Create New...