Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have just finished fitting GT2860-9s to my car, when cruising along in 5th at 100ish going up hills with light load it starts making a sound like a steam train, it does not surge power wise, but it just makes this noise for as long as I hold it on light throttle, so I back off, it stops, accelerate, still not there, lift off to hold 100k, it starts again.. It did used to do the same with stock turbos but rarely, and not as bad.

Questions:

Is it compressor surge?

Apart from being bloody annoying is it doing any damage?

With a PFC and a tune will it be possible to get rid of it? (or what will?)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/340270-is-is-compressor-surge/
Share on other sites

Its a typical GTR problem, but my soarer also does it sometimes,

Its because the Dash-9s in your case want to spool up very quickly, but the engine cant swallow it so it spits the excess air back out the turbo inlet, which slows 1 turbo down as the air comes back out then vice versa with the 2nd turbo.

Do you have the standard Bovs on the car or aftermarket ones? the standard ones are always open when the intake is under vacume to help prevent this.

hey mate yeah mine does exactly the same thing ive got gtss(same same -9) apexi intake and still have the standard bovs. Mine does it at zero vacuum and i was thinking that it was the bovs opening a little and air flowing through them but i havnt tested this theory. i might have a play next week.

I dont think its anything to worry about but up a slight hill it can be a bit annoying.

Apexi pods and turbos are the only mods, does it on any boost setting (7,12,18). Turbo shuffle sounds far more likely, that is the noise I am getting, remember hearing talk about it previously but had forgotten until GTScotT mentioned it. Definately not the induction noise.

does it go away when you put your foot down? my -5's with apexi pods do the same sort of thing at around 3.5-4k, i think its just something to do with the way the exhaust housing is designed.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

This basically happens when the engines displacement is too small for the turbo application. What you need to do is think of it a little like this. An rb26 with twin turbos is essentially like having x2 1300cc displacement engines with single turbos on each (which in most cases is too large for the displacement. As you can imagine as you increase the turbo size (say gtrs's, -10's or even -5's) your tubro shuffle, compressor surge or axi-symmetrical compressor stall (what ever the hell you want to call it) will get worse. Hence why almost all gtr's fitted with gtr's or -10's will shuffle at some point in the rev range. Get an sr20 slap on one of the said turbo's to it and you wont see that type of shuffle (2000cc displacement engine running a turbo more efficient for its displacement).

Now on how to try cure it. You can increase tge turbine housing to try slow the compressor down, (or use smaller turbos), but here you will run into another dilema, LAG. You can increase the engine displacement (why you generally wont here shuffle on a rb30/26 engine with -10's etcetc). You can try have your tuner tune it out, baffled turbo pipes etcetc. But the most effective way ive found is to use a 3 dimensional boostcontroller. Its basically an electronic controlled solenoid (by the ECM) with an rpm input ( which alters the duty cycle of the boost control valve as the RPM changes), and a throttle position sensor input (tells the turbo how much power the drive is demanding and essentially tells the turbo how much air the engine is capable of swallowing to avoid such a surge). 9 times out of 10 this will work.

p.s ( i love brackets)

(same)

u can also try lowering the gain setting or start boost dependong on ur boost controller. This helped with mine it makes the turbos slightly laggier but helps prevent choo choo train.

i have n1 's. Sunce changin bac to stock intakes it is gone completely

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
×
×
  • Create New...