Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is my mates one with the same mods.

Interesting points yours makes more power down low and my mates one only starts to get in front from 130km/h onwards. Your dyno seems to stop early, do you have different diff gears?

Could it be your cam gears have been adjusted for more low down power instead of up top?

post-29432-1287467250_thumb.jpg

post-29432-1287468033_thumb.jpg

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

This is my mates one with the same mods.

Interesting points yours makes more power down low and my mates one only starts to get in front from 130km/h onwards. Your dyno seems to stop early, do you have different diff gears?

Could it be your cam gears have been adjusted for more low down power instead of up top?

For all i know the diff gears are standard...

you could be right about the cam gears being adjusted for more low down

I am getting the car on a different dyno tomorrow should be interesting

Put the car on the dyno today result was 194, will be getting a retune by another workshop next week.

Not happy with 'recommendations' from first tuner to do a way with the stock airbox as it's cause of alot of restriction.

Ohwell I guess this is how you learn where to go...

Put the car on the dyno today result was 194, will be getting a retune by another workshop next week.

Not happy with 'recommendations' from first tuner to do a way with the stock airbox as it's cause of alot of restriction.

Ohwell I guess this is how you learn where to go...

Heh - i'm running 305kw with the stock 32 air box, so yeah that tuner is a muppet. (though i did take the plastic snorkel that sits on the outside of the engine bay near the headlight off).

Can you please PM me the tuner's name?

Also, if you don't want to iterate through tuners to find someone good, just go straight to CRD or Unigroup :D Or come to the Unigroup tuning day and learn to do it yourself. You might even be able to have your car used for demo so it gets a tune at the same time!

Better that than 300kw and pinging its head off like one so called reputable workshop in Sydney did to me...never ever forgive them for that. I saw knock readings up to 190 and had to drive very conservatively until I got a new tune from a person that actually knew what they were doing and weren't in it just for the $$$$!!

I would have taken it back, but why??? Wasn't letting a load of muppets play grenades with my skyline again.........once bitten twice shy!!!

I think you will see a better result from another tuner, or at least a valid reason why the power figure is low - thus giving you some direction.

I was running 245rwkw with my old std motor, mods were power fc with std afm, adjustable cam gears and a 3" exhaust with a guttered cat, was using 14 psi of boost, also still using the std air box.

Although now with a new forged engine, not to much has changed except turbos and 20 psi of boost, now running 340rwkw, still using the std airbox.

Your power levels seem a little bit low to me, it would be interesting to hear the results and opinions when you take it to a new tune/workshop.

Good Luck!

Can you please PM me the tuner's name?

Also, if you don't want to iterate through tuners to find someone good, just go straight to CRD or Unigroup :) Or come to the Unigroup tuning day and learn to do it yourself. You might even be able to have your car used for demo so it gets a tune at the same time!

You have PM

Thought about CRD but the workshop i am going to have really helped me out and made time for me to check it all out.

Better that than 300kw and pinging its head off like one so called reputable workshop in Sydney did to me...never ever forgive them for that. I saw knock readings up to 190 and had to drive very conservatively until I got a new tune from a person that actually knew what they were doing and weren't in it just for the $$!!

I would have taken it back, but why??? Wasn't letting a load of muppets play grenades with my skyline again.........once bitten twice shy!!!

I think you will see a better result from another tuner, or at least a valid reason why the power figure is low - thus giving you some direction.

Yea i wasnt going to go back to him again, just for the reason that it could get worse.

When i went today they also still had my previous power run when i first bought the car on file, they were shocked and straight away saw the problem and reassured me that it will get fixed

Do you still have the compliance cat in the car? if so then thats the answer of why you are 30 killerwasps shy of most others

I have a 100cell highflow metal cat

I was running 245rwkw with my old std motor, mods were power fc with std afm, adjustable cam gears and a 3" exhaust with a guttered cat, was using 14 psi of boost, also still using the std air box.

Although now with a new forged engine, not to much has changed except turbos and 20 psi of boost, now running 340rwkw, still using the std airbox.

Your power levels seem a little bit low to me, it would be interesting to hear the results and opinions when you take it to a new tune/workshop.

Good Luck!

Thank you for the support im still new to all this but hey its all about learning right!!!

And a big thanks to everyone on here really appreciate it and will update you when it gets sorted :)

Nick

holy crap 190? didnt know u could get a reading that high LOL most ive had is in the 80's. 100+ must be the ping that u can actually hear as a rattle??

Not to hijack thread, I only did one agressive accel in 3rd and one hill in 5th. After that I learnt that if you didn't load the motor up it was fine. I drove it like a deisel truck until I organised another tune. If they had ever tested their tune on the road they would have seen what they did with no real effort. And they had the car there for a fortnight [i had to drop it off and leave, I work away a fair bit].

A friend on here told me of his Nistune tuning not long ago. The tuners had apparently done WOT tune and nothing else. The rest of the map was pretty much standard. I lol'd at the lack of effort from this tuner.

what was the problem that they identified?! some form of restriction?

they saw straight away that the rune was crap!!

There is no restriction, and seeing that it is running 2psi more then when i first bought it (due to exhaust) just shows he did a half assed job

A friend on here told me of his Nistune tuning not long ago. The tuners had apparently done WOT tune and nothing else. The rest of the map was pretty much standard. I lol'd at the lack of effort from this tuner.

happens a lot more often than you think

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...