Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The boost leak would cover a bit, but they both still come on pretty late for their size :(

I dunno, maybe a 4th gear pull would have been a better indicator for that? The 6258's look like they could get you to 900hp according to BW, so they are not exactly small, but I agree with you based on this dyno chart.

Edited by TheKeeper

I dunno, maybe a 4th gear pull would have been a better indicator for that? The 6258's look like they could get you to 900hp according to BW, so they are not exactly small, but I agree with you based on this dyno chart.

The turbo(s) have no idea which gear its in... a turbo won't spool differently just because a different gear is engaged, the rate the dyno allows the car to pull through the rpm will be the real teller.

EFR6258 is ~400hp rated I thought? Makes it comparable with GT-RS/Garrett "-10s" and given it looks like its full boost around or after 5000rpm, comparable to them in spool as well?

The turbo(s) have no idea which gear its in... a turbo won't spool differently just because a different gear is engaged, the rate the dyno allows the car to pull through the rpm will be the real teller.

EFR6258 is ~400hp rated I thought? Makes it comparable with GT-RS/Garrett "-10s" and given it looks like its full boost around or after 5000rpm, comparable to them in spool as well?

Actually I have seen as much as 30whp increase and 400-500RPM faster spool in 4th gear vs. 3rd gear on Mustang dynos. Otherwise you could just run 1st gear and get the same results if you could strap the car down well enough, but the fact that the RPM's increase so quickly the turbos cannot be loaded properly for an accurate reading. I see in the in-car video it looks like the car spools from zero bar at 3,000RPM to 1.2 bar before it gets to 4,000 which tells me that on the road I bet those spool to 19psi by 4500RPM or so...

The 6258's are rated at 450HP each.

The turbo(s) have no idea which gear its in... a turbo won't spool differently just because a different gear is engaged, the rate the dyno allows the car to pull through the rpm will be the real teller.

So your saying a turbo will spool the same in 1st gear as 4th gear??? Not a chance.

So your saying a turbo will spool the same in 1st gear as 4th gear??? Not a chance.

I have enough respect for you to realise if you made the post I did you'd not mean something retarded like that, even though you don't know me in person I'd like think by now you should be a bit wiser than that. Either that or I give you too much credit.

Most dynos control the rate a car goes through the revs, so while of course a car will generate a different amount of psi by xrpm in different gears on the road - if you run a car from 2500rpm to 7500rpm at a steady rate in 9s in 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and then 5th gear on a dyno (if it were able to allow such a test) do you think the turbo will spool differently with all things otherwise equal?? And if so, please explain how?

I have enough respect for you to realise if you made the post I did you'd not mean something retarded like that, even though you don't know me in person I'd like think by now you should be a bit wiser than that. Either that or I give you too much credit.

Most dynos control the rate a car goes through the revs, so while of course a car will generate a different amount of psi by xrpm in different gears on the road - if you run a car from 2500rpm to 7500rpm at a steady rate in 9s in 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and then 5th gear on a dyno (if it were able to allow such a test) do you think the turbo will spool differently with all things otherwise equal?? And if so, please explain how?

Prob came across a little harsh.

So your willing to assume that dynos will get this perfectly right? From the post by 'TheKeeper' above he states that just between 3rd and 4th gears on a mustang dyno is a 4-500rpm difference! I am yet to see this dyno behaviour and I prefer to see all dynos done in 4th gear to minimise the chance of inconsistencies.

I also remember having a 'discussion' with some users on here that stated that boost response will be the same in every gear and that load and speed had nothing to do with it. Might not have been you but I think we need to make sure that people new to turbos understand this so they dont choose the wrong turbo. It can be up to 1000rpm+ difference between 1st and 4th.

Same as I find it very misleading when some people use correction factors on their dynosheets and dont mention it. Makes it hard for people to do comparisons and make their choice of turbo. The more we can reduce the calculations performed by the dyno the better.

  • Like 1

So your willing to assume that dynos will get this perfectly right? From the post by 'TheKeeper' above he states that just between 3rd and 4th gears on a mustang dyno is a 4-500rpm difference! I am yet to see this dyno behaviour and I prefer to see all dynos done in 4th gear to minimise the chance of inconsistencies.

I also remember having a 'discussion' with some users on here that stated that boost response will be the same in every gear and that load and speed had nothing to do with it.

Definitely wasn't me, I posted a spool vid of my GT30R using different gears and load levels to help relate what it behaves like in different situations to people considering turbo options for an RB25 knowing full well it doesn't work that way.

I admittedly am not so familiar with dynos used in Oz but if you can't really count on a dyno being consistant in terms of acceleration rates, then there is no point at all in comparing dyno results to ascertain spool.

I like to see 4th gear pulls as well as anybody on the dyno, but it's really not necessary when you plan to use the same gear and same dyno. (as long as it's not first or second as we all know) It's just very hot here and loading 4th gear is a long run. It will yield a faster spool and possibly more HP on most dynos, but not always worth it. I'm not sure Harey how you say you've never seen it other than maybe every pull you've been associated with has been 4th gear. Since we know the difference between 1st and 4th can be 1,000+ RPM, it stands to reason there is a difference between 1st to 2nd, 2nd to 3rd, 3rd to 4th, 4th to 5th....etc. The in car video shows only 1,000RPM range, but over a bar (1.2 if I remember my MFD's correctly) and it must be 4th or 5th gear because it spools quite a bit in that 1,000 RPM from 3,000 to 4,000. I can guarantee on that particular dyno a 4th gear pull would have shown faster spool and more HP.

Definitely wasn't me, I posted a spool vid of my GT30R using different gears and load levels to help relate what it behaves like in different situations to people considering turbo options for an RB25 knowing full well it doesn't work that way.

I admittedly am not so familiar with dynos used in Oz but if you can't really count on a dyno being consistant in terms of acceleration rates, then there is no point at all in comparing dyno results to ascertain spool.

The ONLY thing I have ever used a dyno for was to ascertain whether or not certain modifications yielded a gain, and if so how much. Same dyno, same settings, same gear, different mods.

I have enough respect for you to realise if you made the post I did you'd not mean something retarded like that, even though you don't know me in person I'd like think by now you should be a bit wiser than that. Either that or I give you too much credit.

Most dynos control the rate a car goes through the revs, so while of course a car will generate a different amount of psi by xrpm in different gears on the road - if you run a car from 2500rpm to 7500rpm at a steady rate in 9s in 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and then 5th gear on a dyno (if it were able to allow such a test) do you think the turbo will spool differently with all things otherwise equal?? And if so, please explain how?

You are spot on. It doesn't matter which gear you are in if the time for the ramp is the same the MAP vs RPM will be the same.

That being said up to a point the more torque you make the harder it is for the tyre carcass to transmit the torque to the roller. Once you get to this point the variation in dyno results can be massive. We have found that over 6000N of tractive effort on two 235's tyres is where the results can start to get spurious. On some big XR6T's we are making close to 12000N of tractive effort in 4th gear going out to 220Km/hr and I can tell you if I did two dyno runs back to back the power drops about 100rwkw and the roller tacho number - ie RPM/VSS ratio can change about 400rpm.

Also mustange dyno read high compared to Dyno dynamic dyno's.

Edited by rob82

Hi guys, great to see the discussion. Truth be told, that dyno is known as the lowest reading in Arizona. You may notice all our previous tests used dynapacks as our benchmark dyno since it is on-par with most other dynos that advertisements and forums reference. I planned to use the dynapacks but we had an opportunity to get these cars on this mustang dyno at a last minute's notice and we took it. The dyno pulls were all done in 3rd gear and we did not use a slow ramp-rate to increase load. it was a worst-case scenario dynoplot for "internet hype" but gives me the data I needed to see. The fuel used was arizona/california 91 octane which is very very poor fuel, it's actually 87 octane that is buffered with MTBE and ethanol to increase the knock resistance. I have a lot of experience with different RB turbos on my personal car and our customers cars, and now that ive had some time in each car, my input is as follows:

R34 w/ twinturbo EFR 6258 -- This car is an absolute blast to drive. I am a sworn single-turbo guy, but this combination is making me think twice about what turbo setup to use for my new car. Look at the in car video of 4th gear, you can see the stock R34 MFD has the boost gauge flashing red, hitting 1.2bar before 4000rpm. The owner of this car is an experienced on-track driver and long time skyline owner. He came from a pair of HKS 2530 twins to this EFR 6258 setup, on the same engine build. He comments that the 2530's did spool up a *tiny* bit earlier, but compared to the performance of the EFR's he doesn't miss anything about the 2530s. We are converting the car to run on E85 and will turn the boost up shortly. of course we will post those dynocharts also. This car is extremely driveable with great torque and comes back up on boost unusally fast between gear changes

R34 w/ single EFR 8374 -- I drove this car with the medium boost internal WG actuator and it felt good, but not great. We installed the high boost actuator (stiffer spring) and the turbo completely woke up. However its off again and i suspect a boost leak. Ive been absolutely swamped with some other jobs and had no time to focus on that car. I believe this is a bit large turbo for a stock head with this small of a camshaft, but this car also makes 1.2 bar before 4000rpm so it's still very driveable. I am eager to get this car sorted with some better flowing top end, and better fuel so we can turn the boost up. Will be sure to post results of this

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

After much reading, calculating and guessing I am going to say I believe a 7670 T4 IW on a 2.5L 6cyl would just about be completely loss-less. Loss less implying you would always have a turbo under your foot capable of supply enough airflow at all RPMs to match the motors want for flow.

Obviously I dont think a 650hp turbo would be standing up hard at 3000rpm like a GTRS, BUT, I do think this turbo would never have leave you waiting and all while seeing a neat 400rwkw.

Come tax return I am considering placing an order. If all goes to plan I will buy it with a low pressure actuator and a high pressure one so I can see how it responds to the factory 1JZ ecu. I have a strong feeling this particular sized turbo would almost feel like an OEM item at lower boost levels, after all I think this is what they were trying to achieve..

I could be wrong and may be better off with a 7064 BUT the map seems to plot better on the 7670, provided the larger exhaust wheel doesnt simply account for more lag.. Hopping Gamma-Ti and twin scroll will come to my 400rwkw party for that one!

  • 2 weeks later...

Finalised my order for a 6258 through Full Race yesterday.

The wait is going to be killer, but it gives me time to sort out my new fuel system, and a clutch to cope with it.

It'll be going on an unopened SR20, running E85 through 1000cc injectors, and likely Brian Crower step 2 cams. I'll be aiming for the high side of 250rwkw with a conservative tune. I'd like to go higher, but a 25 box conversion doesn't quite make its way into the budget...

I'm ever so slightly excited... :D

And speaking of the guys at Full Race, f**king awesome blokes! Went out of their way to test fit a 6258 to a stock manifold equipped SR to check clearances and take a bunch of photos for me without any guarantee that I'd end up buying, super helpful and seriously cool guys.

Nice - that should be pretty awesome! 6258 though? I'd have been pretty tempted to get a 6758 after spending that much, HKS GTRS are amazing on SR20s and the 6758 is still smaller so isn't exactly going to be laggy.

PS: I saw your avatar etc previously and thought nothing of it as I frequent the HevyDevy forum and you get used to that, but this is SAU - AWESOME :D I have Deconstruction and Ghost preordered haha

nup he made the right choice. I have a fair bit of info (that I can't share just yet) on 6255 v 6258 vs 6758 but I can tell you the 6258 is the gun set-up in that range for what he wants to do with his SR20. All three have their optimum applications I'm sure but for that I think he's made the right choice.

I am thinking about trying a pair of them on my 2.7 GTR currently running twin HKS 2530s... :)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for all the replies fellas. Gonna finish putting it back together and see how it handles the set up. If it starts pinging it’ll be parked.
    • Well, I can recommend the partial AV system translation CD I ordered from Car Audio Workshop in NZ. Whilst it didn't address the date issue, it has conveniently translated on-screen menu items into English, and now allows the GPS-received time to be offset in hours rather than minutes, so I can display Eastern Australian time accurately ( and bump it by another hour when daylight savings starts ).
    • Yuh, if it's 45°C outside, my car is driving in it.
    • I'd be curious to hear more. Otherwise, have you driven a modern x-trail? I wonder how it compares. Here in Australia they are/were popular for rentals and fleet vehicles. I have been in some and my impression was they are bad. But, this may have been very different in the 2000s at a good trim level. Twenty years is plenty of time to make the model worse. I do very much agree with the 2 silver cars in the garage approach. But, not driving because it's too hot would not leave a lot of time in the year for many Australians. I don't think you need to worry too much unless the car has actual issues with overheating. 
    • Back again. I returned to Japan in Jul/Aug to spend time with the car on my birthday and remind myself what all the sacrifice and compromise is for. It happened to line up with the monthly morning meet in Okutama, which I have been wanting to go to for a long time. It's a unique event at a unique spot with really rare, interesting, and quirky cars. It's where all the oldheads and OGs gather. The nighttime scene at DKF certainly has its place and should be experienced if you're into cars, but there's too much bad attention and negativity around it now. IMO the better time is Sunday morning at DKF or Okutama; it's more chill and relaxed. I'm glad I was finally able to go, but not sure it's worth the drive from all the way from Nagoya immediately the day before, unless I was already staying in Tokyo for the days right before the meet, because you have to wake up quite early to make it in time. Funnily enough though I didn't drive the car all that much this trip because it was just too damn hot. While there were zero issues and running temps were nominal and the A/C was strong, RBs already run crazy hot as it is. Sure, it took it all like a champ but something about driving these cars in the ridiculous heat/humidity bothers me and makes me feel like I'm asking too much of it. I'm just me being weird and treating the car like a living thing with feelings; I'm mechanically sympathetic to a fault. Instead I was mainly driving something else around - a KX4(silver) 2001 X-Trail GT, that I acquired in May. There's a few different flavors to choose from with Xs, but visually it's the Nissan version of the Honda CR-V. Mechanically it's a whole different story as this, being the top-trim GT, has an SR20VET mated to a four-speed auto and full-time AWD! It was a very affordable buy in exceptional condition inside and out, with very low mileage...only 48k kms. Most likely it was owned by an older person who kept it garaged and well-maintained, so I'm really happy with how it all worked out. It literally needs zero attention at the moment, albeit except for some minor visual touch-ups. I wanted something quirky, interesting, and practical and for sure it handily delivers on all three of those aspects. I was immediately able to utilize the cargo and passenger capacity to its full extent. It's a lot of fun to drive and is quite punchy through 1st and 2nd. It's very unassuming -in the twisty bits it's a lot more composed than one would think at a glance- and it'll be even better once I get better tires on it(yes, it's an SUV but still a little boat-y for my liking). So...now I have two golden-era Nissans in silver. One sports car and one that does everything else; the perfect two-car solution I think👍 The rest of the trip...I was able to turn my stressed brain off and enjoy it, although I didn't quite get to do as much as I thought. I did some interesting things, met some interesting people, and happened into some interesting situations however, that's all for another post though only if people really want to know. Project-wise, I went back to Mine's again to discuss more plans and am hoping to wrap that up real soon; keep watching this space if that interests you. Additionally, while working in the tormenting sweatbox that is the warehouse, I was able to organize most of the myriad of parts that my friend is storing for me along with the cars, and the 34 has a nice little spot carved out for it: And since it can get so stupid hot in there, that made it all the more easy -after I was standing there looking at the car and said 'f**k it'- to finally remove all the damn gauges that have mostly been an eyesore all this time. Huzzah. The heat basically makes the adhesive backing on the gauge mounts more pliable to work with, so it was far less stressful getting this done. I didn't fully clean it up or chase the wiring though; that will happen once I have the car in closer possession. Another major reason to remove all that stuff is to give people less reasons to get in my car and steal s**t while it's being exported/imported when/if the time comes, which leads us to my next point... ...and that is even though it's time in Japan is technically almost up since it's a November car and the X would be coming in March, I'm still not entirely sure where my life and career is headed; I don't really know what the future looks like and where I'm going to end up. I feel there's a great deal of uncertainty with me and as a result of that, it feels like I'm at a crossroads moreso now than any point in my life thus far and there are some choices I need to make. Yes, I've had some years to consider things and prepare myself, however too much has happened in that time to maintain confidence and everything feels so up in the air; tenuous one might say. Simply put, there's just too much nonsense going on right now from multiple vectors. Admittedly, I'm struggling to stay in the game and keep my eyes on the prize. So much so in fact, that very recently I came the closest I ever have before to calling it quits outright; selling everything and moving on and not looking back. The astute among you will pick up on key subtext within this paragraph. In the meantime I've still managed to slowly acquire some final bits for the car, but it feels nice knowing there's not much left to get and I'm almost across that finish line; I have almost everything I'll ever want for my interpretation and expression on what it is I think an R34 should be. 'til later.
×
×
  • Create New...