Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Any idea on the cam/head specs on that 2j lith?

So full boost at 4k is rather good for a near 800hp

I wonder how much sooner the 6262 would come on?

The 2J is mental, its a 3.4litre stroker running an angry head and 9.5:1 compression - good motor to get the best out of a turbo.

Slightly OT, but from the same car the initial test was a PT6266 vs PT6766 vs a PT7175 - they just maxed out all turbos and posted the results:

62vs67vs71.jpg

SP have also tested a new PT6466CEA which the results for are flabberghasting. Looks like a fricken awesome unit for a street 3litre.

Naturally the power delivery and power levels are mental because of it being a big angry 2JZ - but its all relative. The EFR8374 is known to spool similar to a GT3582R, so the PT6266 etc are very very impressive for the power they make.

Stupidly responsive for the power output!

Yeah but have a look @ the power band, the EFR noses over after 1500rpm (4000-5500rpm), where the Precision pulls for a solid 2500rpm (5000-7500). Numbers are rough, but ya get the picture

Depends on the use of the car. Also Precision not being twin scroll as well... Very interesting comparo.

Yeah but have a look @ the power band, the EFR noses over after 1500rpm (4000-5500rpm), where the Precision pulls for a solid 2500rpm (5000-7500). Numbers are rough, but ya get the picture

Depends on the use of the car. Also Precision not being twin scroll as well... Very interesting comparo.

I assume it would be their 7 sec street/strip Supra motor for the big 1000hp runs

Was reading the full thread on SF earlier

We set out to prove the R14 conversion kit, ETS-Pro and EFR turbo today. using the EFR 8374 on my RB26, we got 1st place on the dyno - 704whp thru the cat, with huge area under the curve. This morning we also got 1st place in autocross (historically our worst event since we usually focused on drag and time attack) but a bad cyl #6 coilpack overheated in the back of the valley and ended our day. too bad, thats racing!

mr lith - here is a cell phone vid of the dyno pull from one of the guys who worked at the dyno shop, you can sort of see the chart at the end. the cat was glowing bright red

Edited by Full-Race Geoff
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...