Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Stock p11 cams have a fair bit of overlap so I guess that lowers dynamic compression and doesn't help make power.

I'll try pull the exhaust off tomorrow and check it out. I guess if I can remove a restriction from it I'll see boost rise a bit higher due to less back pressure since I run open loop boost control.

You should definitely consider changing cams or fiddling with timing on these. If you haven't already I would be advancing the exhaust cam at least 4 degrees to try and reduce that overlap. How you will test for valve contact on high lobe before actually running it though, I have no idea.

Within a few hundred RPM I have a comparable result to you, except mine has more midrange and I am running a far less exotic setup. GTX3071R, S14 DET with non VCT cams, 98 ron, 295rwkw peak, 280kw mid 4k on a DD roller. I attribute my result to the cam profile (256/11.5 Poncam).

For a VET setup with functional VVL, E85 and a EFR 7163 I think there is more to be desired. I would definitely visit the cam profile, and/or the timing. Remember to reduce overlap by advancing exhaust and use the intake to determine your powerband. In this case I think the little EFR is getting wound up a fair way and even the intake cam could be advances 2-3 degrees. Remember to offset whatever you advance the intake to the exhaust when you consider overlap.

Hope this helps!

[email protected], you bloody lucky SR owners, that is a profile I dream about for my 26 heads

Advancing the exhaust cam increasing overlap will give a higher dyno reading but what does that do for the 1/4mile dyno, MPH

I never advance exhaust, I always retard it cause overlap mean very little compared to what happens at the other end

Cam gears are advanced 2 degrees on the intake and retarded 1 degree on the exhaust. I guess that doesn't help with overlap, but we figured it'd be a pretty safe bet to widen the powerband a bit.

I think I will change cams but undecided on which ones to go. I'll look into it more

Checked the flex join in my downpipe today and the internal braid is fine and 3" diameter. The only other potential restriction in the exhaust would be my mid-muffler which has offset in and out.

I checked the turbine when the exhaust was off and it looks perfect.

Nick - an instance like this would be very helpful to have a turbo shaft speed sensor. This way you could correlate shaft speeds and determine if you had a boost leak (high shaft speed) or an exhaust restriction (low shaft speed)

The only other potential restriction in the exhaust would be my mid-muffler which has offset in and out. I checked the turbine when the exhaust was off and it looks perfect.

good idea to check that, and running without the muffler connected may easily help determine this - as compared to looking through it (seperating welds) or cutting it open for inspection

Cam gears are advanced 2 degrees on the intake and retarded 1 degree on the exhaust. I guess that doesn't help with overlap, but we figured it'd be a pretty safe bet to widen the powerband a bit.

I think I will change cams but undecided on which ones to go. I'll look into it more

Overlap is not a bad thing on high VE twinscroll 4 cylinder engines. In fact the best turbo 4 cyl race motors we end up with are typically using moderately aggressive all motor cams... i can not comment about your cam gear settings, but do not believe changing the cams would resolve anything

  • Like 1

[email protected], you bloody lucky SR owners, that is a profile I dream about for my 26 heads

Advancing the exhaust cam increasing overlap will give a higher dyno reading but what does that do for the 1/4mile dyno, MPH

I never advance exhaust, I always retard it cause overlap mean very little compared to what happens at the other end

Got that back to front man, advancing the exhaust cam means the exhaust closes sooner and the there is less overlap when the intake opens.

In my case reducing overlap worked wonders. More vacuum on idle and a lot more lively off boost.

Got that back to front man, advancing the exhaust cam means the exhaust closes sooner and the there is less overlap when the intake opens.

In my case reducing overlap worked wonders. More vacuum on idle and a lot more lively off boost.

Haha, oops, yeah got that back to front, meant decreases overlap

On my cars I advance intake and retard exhaust which increases overlap but gives results for the 26s

That an interesting result, what are the LCAs on your cams ?

  • 2 weeks later...

What if they were to go between the same turbo.

You have a 1.05 rear on a 8374 and wanted to try a 1.45?

Yes, that is fine, the wheels remain the same just the housings change.

The big problem is just buying an exhaust housing on its own, I wanted a 1.05 a while back and they just weren't available.

Not sure you would need to go to a 1.45, I'm already over speeding my 8374 on a 0.92 housing (132,000rpm, recommended max is 120,000, absolute max speed at 140,000) I think the 1.05 would be plenty on a 8374.

If you want more you would be best to go to the 9180

Does anyone know if the 1.05 rears are interchangeable with the 1.45 rears on the 8374 and 9180?

yes, fully interchangable. The housings are direct plug and play for a given wheel size! we have these in stock if anyone wants to try

The big problem is just buying an exhaust housing on its own, I wanted a 1.05 a while back and they just weren't available.

we have the 0.83, 0.92 and 1.45 a/r exhaust housings in stock - no wait. only the 1.05 are hard to get at this moment

http://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-dyno-tuning-results/705932-martin-s-9180-efr-1-45-twin-scroll.html

Interesting that a 9180 with a 1.45 on a 2.4L evo is starting to choke?

Keep in mind - that is a fully built 2.4L race evo, with our AC compatible / Stock radiator kit. This uses the smallest runners and most restricted 3" downpipe for any kit we make. I believe there is >100+hp on the table by going to a larger diameter runner and nonAC downpipe

Thanks for clearing that up Geoff the 3" exhaust would be hurting things alot at that power level. The RB this will be going onto is quite extensive also. 2.8L stroker big $$$ head etc so what would be your choice on the 8374 Geoff?

Thanks for clearing that up Geoff the 3" exhaust would be hurting things alot at that power level. The RB this will be going onto is quite extensive also. 2.8L stroker big $$$ head etc so what would be your choice on the 8374 Geoff?

I'm not Geoff.....But for a 8374 on a RB28 with head and cams, I would say the 1.05a/r

  • Like 1

Would you consider jumping upto the 1.05 on your 3.0?

If I was going to do it over from the start I would put a 1.05a/r on it.

......however with the response and power I have now I don't think I'd change anything, if I wanted more than 650whp (98 pump gas) I would just go to a 9180 as I don't think I will be able to squeeze much more out of the 8374 even with a bigger exhaust housing.

Edited by Sub Boy32
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did this end up working? Did you take some pictures?
    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
×
×
  • Create New...