Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well good to see all the feed back. dont realy think i need one now as you only use you narrow or wide band to tune when off throttle (closed loop) when wide open throttle the fc refers back to the tune map, so cant see the point of installing one, and since they tune my care with a wide band sensor as im sure your all aware (as i wasnt), its really no point, correct me if im wrong which i guess i may be as this is just what my tuner has said. i was under the impression the powerfc was always monitoring the narrow band 02 even on full throttle and as a narrow band will only show rich or lean, not how rich or how lean that it may aid my performance on full throttle by installing a wie band 02 sensor giving more accurate a/f ratio to the power fc.

Widebands are great for road tuning. I dont know if you had yours rad tuned as well as dyno tuned, but obviously you cannot simulate road conditions on a dyno.

I have an LC1 permanently installed in my R33, and myself and Lithium have spent hours perfecting the tune, in conjunction with a knock sensor, on the road after it was dyno tuned. Youd be surprized how many zones the dyno cant touch compared to real world conditions. Makes the car so much more enjoyable to drive when the AFRs and timing are spot on in all conditions,

I noticed the PFC doesnt support it, witch is quite poo, but mine is wired directly into my Link G4, and you can also set it up to target an AFR at set KPA's. So it will self learn and adjusts the map as it needs to for uber economy. Then when you go outside the set KPA it will revert back to the set fuel and ignition maps. Quite clever. And so far its proving quite good :)

I think our next step is to have a play with throttle position tuning rather than KPA. The stock turbo breaches the KPA we have set (based on being sensible) with the slightest touch. So it is less economical than it should/could be if it had a larger turbo that took more throttle to breach the set KPA.

thread revival, I have PFC and running with o2 sensors switched off as they are outputting weird values (crap)

I have aem uego wideband kit capable to supplying 0-5v narrowband signal which I was thinking of hooking up as input into PFC

will I need to splice the input into PFC due to running factory twin o2 sensor

yer you can do this with it spliced in. its not 0-5v though, narrowband is 0-1v, 0 being lean, 1 being rich and .5v is stoich. even if the tune is good, one advantage of using the wideband to simulate a narrowband is you can tune the map to be good everywhere (say around 15:1 on cruise) then you could set the wideband to put out .5v at ~16:1 and set the ecu to only use the signal during very light load cruising. the benefits might be minute but it'd give you slighly more economical cruising.

Widebands are great for road tuning. I dont know if you had yours rad tuned as well as dyno tuned, but obviously you cannot simulate road conditions on a dyno.

I have an LC1 permanently installed in my R33, and myself and Lithium have spent hours perfecting the tune, in conjunction with a knock sensor, on the road after it was dyno tuned. Youd be surprized how many zones the dyno cant touch compared to real world conditions. Makes the car so much more enjoyable to drive when the AFRs and timing are spot on in all conditions,

how did you find the best timing for cruise during road tuning?

  • 12 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah that is not actually a lot. Just painting my GTR frontend and the little bits to make sideskirts/nismo flare pieces work correctly/fit on the sedan/mount up correctly came to about $7000. Is it a lot? Sure. None of this is economical. Economy would be shelling the car and buying a 2010 Corolla to commute in. The perspective of all of this is different.
    • I have the re003s’ on my 06 XT Forester Turbo and I highly rate them for street wet and dry
    • I don't see any issues here. I've been saying all along this is a big job, the price reflects that.  When the car comes back perfect I'm sure it will feel like money well spent. 
    • Remember, take original quote. Double it. Then add a bit more. It's how any project goes.
    • So, I started this repair and got as far as "fixing" the holes with some fibreglass. God all those years working on boats came back quickly. I decided I'd reach out to some rust guys just to see what they would say about it. I came across a guy about 40 mins away and went to see him. He said the windscreen needs to come out, that there might be some more bits around the windscreen and he'd quote them at the time. But his quote was $300 to remove and replace windscreen and $3k for the damage he can see. He said he could respray the roof for $1200 and the bonnet for another $800 (somebody has previously rattle canned it, its horrendous). This is $5300 + any small additional bits. It's a lot, I get that and the name of one of my fave youtube channels 'Not Economically Viable' comes to mind.  I'm not being financially rational, but I've taken him up on the quote. He's opening a new shop in November with more room, so we're waiting for that. I'll leave the currently missing headliner out until then. I'm looking forward to it being fixed and having the paint looking nice again (lots of clear coat issues on the roof too). / flame suit on.
×
×
  • Create New...