Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I can imagine it would be hard to be a tuner just like its hard to do any job but if I did something in my job that my client wasnt happy with they would ask why too wouldnt they...

oh slap, hey I should of just added a smiley face it was a bit pun from other threads I read, I have no experience with hypergear and I think he does a great job...

and I do appreciate your help, its more confirmation for me tbh Im obviously able to see there is a problem, I wouldnt say 'clearly need' though.

so do you have anything constructive to add or are you just venting?

The way it is written looks very different. I think you should change it as the way it is written is basically defamation of a company.

As others have said crank up the wastegate preload. It should only be roughly $100/hour of dyno time. It should be less than 2 hours.

Also pickup one of those $30 turbotech boost valves. It solved the GT3076 problem the other day.

I would be very tempted to have a cheapy turbotech boost controller handy just in case the PFC boost controller is either playing up or has been setup poorly.

$30 is cheap to rule out a potential problem.

Wastegate pre-load is still the most likely issue that needs to be checked.

I just swapped a GT-RS for a 2835ProS on the Stagea and it made 262rwkw at 16psi (bleeding to 15psi) and it was all in pretty much around 3300rpm (from memory). I know there is more average power to be had with fine tuning light, light/medium load but the headline number is pretty consistent with other results.

You will sort it out.

  • 4 weeks later...

Finally got the car back in for another tune with adjustment made to the wastegate... now making 290rwkw, I'll post the dyno sheet once I pick them up...

this time the dyno print should have rpm, boost & afr for a better overview...

Thats fantastic news mate! Well done. Awesome peak power figure and knowing the turbo it will have a very strong mid range.

Just concretes my opinion that these are the best turbo for a stockish RB25 engine.

Well all the reading and research lead me to believe this was the best choice turbo for response vs power, the tuner believes the turbo is too small, but maybe he thinks Im chasing power beyond the 2835s range, I would of been happy with 275-285rwkw tbh, which I thought the turbo was well able to do, much less and it would be in gtrs rhelms really wouldnt it...

I cant wait to post dyno sheets and see what people think... Im eager to see afr's myself

the .82 rear is optioned for the 1JZ as well.

I've just got my HKS GT2835 KAI kit, so I'm interested to see the difference in this over the Pro S. Supposed to be the new version of the Pro S but I cant find much info on it, other then it makes a couple of KW more at the cost of some torque? But its still a bit sketchy anyway lol.

Glad to see you got yours sorted mate. Will be helpful if something similar happens to me when my tune is started

Guys the 2835 Pro S kit for the RB25 definitely comes with the 0.68 exhaust housing by default:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/HKS-Turbo-Kit-GT283...=item20b4f48ef8

The 0.68 is how they get the awesome response and mid range, but it still seems to be big enough to flow 280-290rwkw on 98, which is enough for most people on stock rb25s.

If someone can repair turbos this could be a great buy:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/R33-R34-RB20-RB25-G...=item19c1223b3b

The 0.68 is how they get the awesome response and mid range, but it still seems to be big enough to flow 280-290rwkw on 98, which is enough for most people on stock rb25s.

Indeed it is a good turbo mate, HKS back cut the wheel so flow characteristics are anyones guess.. HKS know what they are doing tho, that turbo is GUN.

Numbers are one thing, but seeing on road results from a 2835 is totally another league.

i musta got the optioned one as i have an 0.82 rear on my Pro S kit sitting on my rb22

awesome... def waiting to see the graph.. +1 great turbo's and good results

Thats strange I thought the Pro S had either a 0.68 or 0.87 exhaust housing??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That was the first session so not a lot to take from the day. It was low 20s ambient and the coolant had got to 110 (and obviously had some pressure!) so that still needs to be addressed. I haven't downloaded the data yet but will. I had refilled the auto trans with Redline DT6 because it claimed the best viscosity I could find at 100o. It wasn't really long enough to get a good feel for that; while the trans got to 100o in the session it still wasn't shifting crisply as I hoped. I think I'll try a few more sessions before judging. No steering motor overheat but I'd hope not in only 1 session! But finally the suspension; it was night and day over the standard stuff and the car was a couple of seconds quicker on the same crappy tyres, which is a huge difference. I'll stick with that and get some sway bars and a mechanical diff sorted too and see how that all goes together
    • I guess it’s partially a compromise of how my car is used, wanting to be able to switch from drift to grip with track side on-car adjustment. Also partially with the way the knuckles are set there is more static camber but less dynamic camber gain. 
    • OK, so update from the track day on Friday It was a classic "an unfortunate series of events'. There were a few cars around and when i checked my mirror coming out of the fish hook I notice some smoke from the rear of mine. Looked again and it was getting much worse, I figured I'd blown a turbo or something to got off it and pulled off the racing line. However.... since it is a left hairpin into a right kink, I was on the inside of the next corner. There was a car passing me on the left and a big drop off over the ripple strip on the right......and someone had knocked the witch's hat that was on the apex about 1m onto the track. So, between those 3, I decided to mow down the cone and not damage my car/the other car. Right choice, but surprising result.  The car decided the cone was a small pedestrian so it blew the rear bonnet hinges up to protect their head in the upcoming person to car impact....I didn't see that coming and like an airbag deployment it happened super fast. Straight into the pits from there, everything was driving fine but it became clear it was a coolant leak not smoke, it was billowing up onto the windscreen. Onto the trailer and home. I'll do a separate thread about the repair (once I work out what it is ), but the immediate problem was the bonnet wouldn't open because the front was pinched onto the front bar and would not release. Ultimately we unbolted the hinge from the bonnet, pulled it back a little and it released from the front OK. "There's your problem", the top radiator hose had popped off at the radiator.
    • Yeah that looks like great caster, but I'd suggest trying less front camber some time and seeing if it helps with braking without reducing mid corner speed too much
    • I ended up setting the rear 5mm higher than normal to give some clearance.  My plan is to run the least camber I can in the rear which I think with the extra width is going to need to be -1.75 to -2.00° just to get clearance.  Guards have been rolled and pulled as much as they can/I would be wanting to.  front has the Acostal knuckle with the KPI change and the drop etc. So should be okay with the existing settings I have run with AR1s etc Front: Toe total -2mm(1mm out each side) Caster +7.5° Camber -3.8° Ackerman +15°
×
×
  • Create New...