Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I read every thread of the 8 pages on gtr.uk about camshaft.

- I have a RB26 with GT-SS. almost no lag, very responsive and I like it this way!

- So I'm looking at a camshaft that will give me more power without taking out the response or barely..

- I'm also looking for a good idle, (I'm aware that the smoothest idle would be my oem cams)

- Drop-in cams is a big + over cams that need custom works to fit.

Would the tomei poncam type-B be the perfect match for what I'm looking for?

Thanks!

How do you expect cams to give you more power? In most situations they will just move the power curve.

Without head work etc, IMO its pointless and you certainly don't need to change them

How do you expect cams to give you more power? In most situations they will just move the power curve.

Without head work etc, IMO its pointless and you certainly don't need to change them

the usual non-constructive stonewall response from nismoid.. perhaps he did mean midrange power.

type b's seem to be the way to go for better idle, both have the same 9.15mm lift, they're my choice

with those turbos id just use a set of cam gears, advance up the intake 4-8 degrees and plot the results, then play with the exhaust but in small increments.

If not i found the Greddy procams 264 with 9.7mm lift to work real nice compared to the poncams but ive only compared them in engines making at least another 50rwkw over the gtss so it not a real help but a good cam comparison nonetheless..

How do you expect cams to give you more power? In most situations they will just move the power curve.

Without head work etc, IMO its pointless and you certainly don't need to change them

Well by looking at this chart from a supra tuner, it's pretty obvious that all 3 camshaft setup gives more power than the OEM setup.

449coip.jpg

I expect the samething to happen to a rb26.

Supra 2JZ graph? Irrelevant for RB26's.

the usual non-constructive stonewall response from nismoid.. perhaps he did mean midrange power.

type b's seem to be the way to go for better idle, both have the same 9.15mm lift, they're my choice

How was it non-constructive exactly?

We've told him before stocker cams are the way to go with that turbo selection for his use of the car (he does want ultimate response afterall).

So in saying that, ultimate response, the stock cams fit that bill perfectly combined with a set of cam gears (which a few have told him before also :))

I mean end of the day if he wants, the Poncams will idle fine etc, barely noticeable however costly exercise should it ruin that which he set out to achieve.

seriously if you want good response and good idle stock cams are the way to go. any cam is going to give you a slightly lumpier idle and going to move your peak torque UP the RPM scale. for GTSS probably the best option for what you want is cam gears. you say you have them but have they been tuned? I gained 30kw midrange in my old GTR with cam gear tuning and about 5kw peak power. so peak power change was quite small but the difference in the midrange and the transition onto boost was amazing.

so yeah, the best bet for you is cam gear tuning. or maybe a set of 34 N1 cams, they are a very mild upgrade.

seriously if you want good response and good idle stock cams are the way to go. any cam is going to give you a slightly lumpier idle and going to move your peak torque UP the RPM scale. for GTSS probably the best option for what you want is cam gears. you say you have them but have they been tuned? I gained 30kw midrange in my old GTR with cam gear tuning and about 5kw peak power. so peak power change was quite small but the difference in the midrange and the transition onto boost was amazing.

so yeah, the best bet for you is cam gear tuning. or maybe a set of 34 N1 cams, they are a very mild upgrade.

I know it sound stupid but I had tomei cam gears fitted on the dyno but the tuner never played with them. I bought these because i got them for 150$. However, when I went on the dyno, the tuner said he would have to charge me like 1-2 hours to get the best out of them and at 220$/hour. I said..well forget the cam tuning lol!

I wasn't expecting such a huge increase from cam gears tuning.

Like you said, with camshaft, I might only get 10whp more peak but if I can get 30lbs torque and 40whp more at midrange(3.5 to 6k) I think it's really worth it and it will make driving more fun.

yeah but cams cost $800-$1000 for a pair, plus maybe $300 fitting, plus you will need a re-tune of the ecu AND adjust the cam gears to get the most out of them. so you're looking at nearly $2000 to do it properly.

for 2 hours of dyno time to set-up the cam gears you will get an excellent result for $400 and you wont loose any response (you will gain some) and your idle wont be much affected at all (slight change).

for what you want you'd be mad to go to all the expense of buying cams. especially since you already have cam gears and just need to spend 1-2hours to have them set-up.

A little off topic an might open a can of worms

but would the same advice be given for a built motor with minor headwork an 2530's???????

Would the bigger turbos give more relevance to bigger cam's

Just curious as to others opinions

A little off topic an might open a can of worms

but would the same advice be given for a built motor with minor headwork an 2530's???????

Would the bigger turbos give more relevance to bigger cam's

Just curious as to others opinions

yeah definitely look at cams with headwork and bigger turbos. but with small bolt ons and standard engine and head there is not a lot to be had. it will fatten up the area around 5,000rpm and give some top end gain but will be at the expense of low down response.

If not i found the Greddy procams 264 with 9.7mm lift to work real nice compared to the poncams but ive only compared them in engines making at least another 50rwkw over the gtss so it not a real help but a good cam comparison nonetheless..

Did you have to do any head modifications to get the Greddy cams to fit?

I always thought the poncams type b was the biggest you could go without modifying the head?

For my 10 cents worth the type B cams suck teh balls.

If you have a proper look you get the following:

Open Closed Centreline

Stock cams

14 degree overlap (commonly modded to 20 degrees)

Intake 240 degrees 7 BTDC 53 ABDC 113 degrees

Exhaust 250 degrees 65 BBDC 7 ATDC 118 degrees

Tomei Poncam A

31 degree overlap

Intake 260 degrees 20 BTDC 60 ABDC 110 degrees

Exhaust 252 degrees 61 BBDC 11 ATDC 115 degrees

Tomei Poncam B

35 degree overlap (modded to 33 degrees)

Intake 260 degrees 20 BTDC 60 ABDC 110 degrees

Exhaust 260 degrees 65 BBDC 15 ATDC 115 degrees

Note the only difference between type A & B is the exhaust cam. Having reverted from the type B to a smaller inlet & exhaust cam the thing goes much, much harder at 4000rpm without giving up anything worth worrying about at the top end when running approx 1 bar on 2860-5's.

But for what it is worth the type B's idle fine. The most common reason the RB26 will hunt at idle with them in is you have the idle screw adjusted too far out.

Lastly I wouldn't bother doing cams until you have the motor out. Only then is it worth thinking about.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...