Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi StagMan...........it did not see on the fire wall .....i would think it would be pretty easy  to see....its not hidden away somewhere

silly is it.............i didn't think so.....lol............thats ok...............its still a MONSTER..........thanx again for your help

Cheers Jon

Hi StagMan...........it did not see on the fire wall .....i would think it would be pretty easy  to see....its not hidden away somewhere

silly is it.............i didn't think so.....lol............thats ok...............its still a MONSTER..........thanx again for your help

Cheers Jon

 

28 minutes ago, MyBrosBaby said:

Hi again....ok here are all the numbers of the blue ID plate in order from the top

IE-BNR32

BRN32-000O906

KBNR32RXFSLMZG

KH2   G

RB32DETT 2568

FS5R30APRC41

The "P" in the last line could be an "F".....can't read my own writing.......i'd go to the car but it's not where

i'm sending the email from............thanx again.............Cheers Jon

That decodes to;

BNR32-000906 

aug 1989 build 

series 1 Japanese Import GTR ( not Australian delivered) 

KH2 = gunmetal grey metallic 

Very early build GTR with that chassis number. 

Update LOL- Duncan you beat me to it. 

Edited by RS4StagMan

Hi...you guys are really sick...i luv it.......i recently acquired the car with the passing of my brother..........hence the name.

It is gunmetal gray....Recaro seats....is that standard?........but from what he told me its got a lot of really good bits on it.......what they are i am unsure of......but .........10.9 for the quarter is better than my Fairmont at 11.9 and i know how quick that is...............do you all meet sometime?

Would be great.....your knowledge is incredible......would luv it pick your brains and have a beer at the same time    again thanx for the

input......Cheers Jon

  • Like 1
On 27/01/2017 at 1:26 PM, MyBrosBaby said:

Hi Everyone....Happy New  year to one and all.......looking for some help trying to find out if the recently

acquired 1992 R32 is an import or one of the 100 Aussie delivered cars............Thanks for your input.........Cheers Jon

968 R32 GT-R's were built in the first month of production being August 1989.

Yours is one of these cars....... Courtesy of the GT-R Registry here is the data - http://gtr-registry.com/en-r32-colours.php

Congratulations........ Cheers, Bob.

BNR32-0000906.JPG

NOW......the million dollar question..........i gotta have this baby insured..........be real nice to know that the GTR geek world think that should be............i can look on EBAY and assorted sites and get an idea but because of its build date is that relevant to its value.....Jon

20 minutes ago, MyBrosBaby said:

Hi.........as i said your knowledge is incredible...........can i assume that August 1989 was the first release of the car.....and this car was in the first batch of cars made????

Yes correct......... Bob.

16 minutes ago, MyBrosBaby said:

NOW......the million dollar question..........i gotta have this baby insured..........be real nice to know that the GTR geek world think that should be............i can look on EBAY and assorted sites and get an idea but because of its build date is that relevant to its value.....Jon

Ring Shannons and NRMA Veteran, Vintage and Classic Insurance.

Impossible for us to quote without seeing photos let alone the car.

Bob.

  • Like 1

Hi..i'll do that..............my Fairmont is insured thru Shannon.........just curious to what you guys thought......it is unmarked and when washed and clean looks brand new.....interior is spotless..........has all original mats......stroked and bigger turbo's.....some smart engine management....

its currently at the mechanic getting the roady for the historic plates........cannot wait get get behind the wheel.........again thanx for all the info.............hope we get to chew the fat at some time..............Cheers Jon

Hi Marko..............cute daughter.............thanx for the condolences ............i check with them ....but i might get a good deal as its the second car i'm getting insured thru Shannons......this is weekend research....i picked up the car last Wednesday........Cheers Jon

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...