Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I am very interested to see how it goes!  Obviously this is all theory, and I think there is worth in the thought experiment side of things.

If you haven't checked them, here's the turbine flow map for the normal GT35 turbine (ie, like from your 3586HTA)
GTX35_TurbineMap.jpg

 

And for the "RS" version:

GEN2GTX3584RS_TurbineMap.jpg

By Garrett's own admission/claims the increase in flow "A/R for A/R" the new RS turbine is only margainally better flowing than the existing GT35.  On paper the 1.06a/r GT35 housing will actually outflow the 1.01a/r "RS" turbine though obviously there is more to it than just that.

Edited by Lithium

Not interested in the GTX3582R GEN II, given the turbine is the same as what I've already got.

How much power does the GTW3884 produce with the 67mm-84mm comp wheel?

1 minute ago, whatsisname said:

Not interested in the GTX3582R GEN II, given the turbine is the same as what I've already got.

I think you missed the point of what I shared.... the difference in turbine flow between the old GT35 and the "RS" one used on the GTX3584RS is 2/10ths of f-all.  

Based off what is available on paper I would wager than the GTW3884R will make more power than the GTX3584RS but will obviously come at some cost in terms of lag but I don't know what people have actually made from the GTW3884R.  I'm guessing something close to what people used to make with GT3794HTAs

Comparing exhaust flow between the GT35 and RS turbines at the same housing size there is a difference in flow. Okay it's not huge, about 1.5-2lbs/min at the important PR range of 3.0-3.5 where most RB motors will operate. Of course anyone willing to sacrifice even more response can use the 1.21 housing where the increase in flow over the GT35 is closer to 4-5lbs/min.

If I can get around up around 530-560kW at the wheels and peak boost by 4000-4500RPM or thereabouts I'll be more than happy with the decision.

Found a dyno result for a GTW3884 on a BA XR6T. No other details other than just over 500kW @ 25psi.

Yeah, I am very interested to see how it goes!  Obviously this is all theory, and I think there is worth in the thought experiment side of things.
If you haven't checked them, here's the turbine flow map for the normal GT35 turbine (ie, like from your 3586HTA)
GTX35_TurbineMap.jpg&key=d1b86af86e594e8efdf3cee3ab44ab98bc5358f9501e4bedc092d544667fbd1c
 
And for the "RS" version:
GEN2GTX3584RS_TurbineMap.jpg&key=35a4320fb2bb48eda32282d583c64fe1572fd98d945576510c52bbd8b489e913
By Garrett's own admission/claims the increase in flow "A/R for A/R" the new RS turbine is only margainally better flowing than the existing GT35.  On paper the 1.06a/r GT35 housing will actually outflow the 1.01a/r "RS" turbine though obviously there is more to it than just that.



1.06 vs 1.01 isn't A/R for A/R [emoji6]

Three more XR6T with GTW3884R results:
427kW 21-22psi on 98
423kW on 19psi also running pump 98
490kW on 24psi Unknown fuel - possibly 98.
Found a 512kW on 20psi running E85 but not sure if it's a GTW3884 result or not

2 hours ago, whatsisname said:

Not interested in the GTX3582R GEN II, given the turbine is the same as what I've already got.

How much power does the GTW3884 produce with the 67mm-84mm comp wheel?

last one i saw was 655rwhp on 36psi through a auto sohc rb30, 144mph ish traps at 1300kg ish

What you and your mate are missing matt, is you are talking T3 housings, doesnt matter how good the turbine is..your pushing shit uphill

from 450rwkw onwards really on a 3.0...okay on a 2.0.. its t4 time if your starting from a clean sheet of paper..this will never change

your giving up spool..and power

Out of interest..the p trim turbine is hardly anymore efficient than a 3582 turbine in the real world without  being backcut alot

and the 65mm old precision turbo turbine is a turbonetics f1 wheel

Edited by jet_r31

So if the T3 housing is the limiting factor, how have people managed to run over 170mph trap speeds and the horsepower required to do so using a T3 housing?

And vls have run that close to that with 3582's with the KTS 11 blade gtx billet wheel on less boost..

my mate went 140mph on 30psi with stupid retard  backpressure(full exhaust  with gate plumbed back), others have gone 143 on 32psi.. with .82s and backcut 3582 turbines

I wonder what peak power gain I would see switching from the current FP T3 0.85 to a Garrett 1.06
463.7kW @ 25psi was all we could get using the 0.85

Saw another RB30ET make 450kW through a 2sp glide running a GTX3582 GEN I - roughly 480-490kW through a 5sp on the BW dyno

Yeh my mates vl made 450rwkw though glide on 30psi with just that 67mm comp wheel upgrade on 3582 ..went 140mph 

make f**kloads more with exhaust off...but went straight to 40psi...and maxed out 2 044's

laggy though...

you really want a pt6466 .82 t3..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't understand how this hasn't boiled down to - Upgrade the turbo when you have everything required. ECU, injectors, fuel pump, turbo, etc. Do it all at once.  If you don't have everything required, just enjoy the car as it is and keep saving up your pennies. 
    • Sounds like you've got an interesting adventure ahead here with local support if you have trouble! My guess is that, unboosted, you will be OK with a small upgrade like -9. What will happen is that once the stock ECU sees more airflow than it expects it will add a heap of fuel and pull a heap of timing to be safe because it can't understand how it could get that much air without there being an issue. You will see clouds of black smoke and it won't pull hard through the midrange and top end. So, overall it will be a bit frustrating but should be OK. If you are still nervous set the base timing back 2o through the CAS, but it will be even more sluggish everywhere. As said above through...this is not my guarantee your engine won't be blown into a million pieces, leaving you looking for very hard to find parts A better idea is get a computer with logging ASAP, wire in a wide band O2 sensor and a use remote tuner. I've done multiple cars this way and while it is not as good as a specific tune on a dyno they can get it 90% right. I'd suggest if you can afford an R33 GTR these days you can afford an ECU and tune. And if you can't afford that you sure won't be able to afford the rebuild if it goes bad in the meantime,.  
    • Yeah it would be nice if someone took the time to put that sort of information together, but there are a lot of variations in looms. I think you are making this way hard for yourself if you just want to get it running....sourcing an SR20 with the right wiring will be a billion times easier than matching the RB loom to an S15 chassis. If you do end up going this way, you just need to trace every wire in the loom with a multimeter, 95% of them will go to a location you can confirm at the ECU.....and then post it up for the next person who needs it  
    • Just top it up with water, and keep a general idea of how much you added. It is normal for water to be pushed into and pulled out of the reservoir through the cap, and it should not be more than half full or it will be likely to overflow when hot. Any decent mechanic can do a pressure test of the cooling system to confirm if you have a leak. Keep in mind if it is only leaking a little and when hot it may well evaporate before you see it hit the ground
    • I'd ask the shop what they used and use that. Mixing coolants is sometimes OK, sometimes not, and you have know the details of each coolant to know whether it's a good idea or not.
×
×
  • Create New...