Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well any similarity between anything called HRT and a proper race team is entirely coincidental.

For that matter any similarity between a race team owned by an investment bank and a successful race team is entirely coincidental. Look at how "Renault" are going backwards for instance.

Holden raacin....... Lol.

Lol yeah, racing cars absorb money, they don't produce it.

so its was true... Williams Renault is back!!

lawd i hope they revive the old colour scheme

Well here is hoping the motor brings a step forward. They are certainly making plenty of changes, so fingers crossed.

Which old colour scheme. The current one is very similar to that from 1994. I guess not having any sponsors makes it easier to paint the thing however you like.

waaaaay too much time and money went into that gearbox, id be amazed if they dumped it so quickly

if they were going to dump it, it would be when the new engines come in

Well I reckon they will dump it if it keeps being unreliable and/or if rule changes mess about with the diffusers & rear end aero which may or may not make the whole thing pointless.

So I read ol' mate Bernie is thinking of suing the FIA over their decision to mandate a V6T formula on the grounds it'll hurt ticket sales. I could understand the gripe if they where being forced down the 4-cyl path, but they'll still sound good with high-revvin' sixes, and I'm sure they'll have at least as much or more power than the current jiggers. Suck it up you rich old khent.

So I read ol' mate Bernie is thinking of suing the FIA over their decision to mandate a V6T formula on the grounds it'll hurt ticket sales. I could understand the gripe if they where being forced down the 4-cyl path, but they'll still sound good with high-revvin' sixes, and I'm sure they'll have at least as much or more power than the current jiggers. Suck it up you rich old khent.

He just want's to be seen to be on the good side of the teams (the ones that matter anyway) as we move closer to the extreme shenanigans of renegotiating the new concord agreement.

I dont know about you guys but i am really looking forward to the silverstone gp, It's the two top teams (atm) home track and both teams don't want to lose this one.

and then there's ferrari, who would like to beat these two with there own spotted dick.

to much to ask for a aussie win? we've double our chances. :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...