Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I just fitted some mods on my R34GTR..-5,injectors,aftermarket fuel reg and pump, full exhaust,ebc

Its just needs to be fitted and tuned with a power f/c..

Its it safe to drive the car hard even though its not tuned yet.

and at the moment still running on standard ecu and stock boost with these mods?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/345450-is-it-safe-to-drive-the-car-hard/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

bahahahaha... not helpful but i like the comment "I'll be honest ive driven it hard a few times to see how it goes.."

the amount of dead gtr's ive seen cause of this same sentiment cracks me up.

PS its idling smoother cause its way richer, dont drive it too much as you will start to wash down the bores. usually we recomend only driving to the tuners with that sort of injector upgrade.

440 vs 600... umm yeah they arealmost 50% bigger...

-5s will do 380-400rwkw, so 600 were a bad choice.

you'd have been better off with 700's and the factory fuel red IMO.

would have been cheaper as well.

What the f**k is with all these knobs using the word "Hater"?!

I see it from every new member.

"Stop being a hater" "Your just a hater"

Dead set, you aint gangsta because you say the word hater, you just sound like a 16 year old pimple faced white kid.

Edited by PM-R33

Here we go....

I wasn't "giving shit". My comment to you was based on the fact that you "claim" to have fitted larger turbos and a larger fuel system onto your vehicle.

First of all I know straight away that you personally didn't fit them yourself but would have had to pay some one to do so. My reasoning for this claim is due to the fact if you had the ability to do such a large job as fit aftermarket turbochargers onto a RB26 engine you wouldn't be stupid enough to think it may be safe to drive a vehicle hard on a stock ECU with larger injectors and turbos designed for x amount of airflow and y amount of fuel. Also you have chosen to get an aftermarket fuel pressure regulator fitted. Clearly if you had picked the right sized injectors in the first place you wouldn't need to be trying to bump up the rail pressure to squeeze more power out of the smaller injectors. Once again strengthening my claim and opinion on you.

This summed up my comment of you not deserving a nice car such as an R34 GTR, perhaps something along the lines of a Daewoo Lanos would be more up your ally.

Please reply back to me with some thing unintelligent like "f**k you" or something similar to once again strenghthen my claim and to get this thread locked.

Ask a stupid question; get treated line an idiot.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...