Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Exactly. I picked up next to no gains in peak horsepower because my turbo is all ready at it's limit. However that is not what larger cams do.

The fact I gained so much power at so low RPM means the car comes onto boost faster and harder, revs out quicker and is faster overall on the street.

It would be like me engaging my nitrous at 2000rpm and turning it off at 4500rpm. On a dyno printout my peak horsepower would be bugger all bigger. Does that mean the nitrous did nothing? Hardly.

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

its all about under the curve if its manily a street car, just dont run out and buy the biggest ones you can find like some do

This - On a regularly driven street car I would be more concerned about having a good idle and what I call carpark drive ablility, i.e light throttle in 1st gear, or pulling up a sloping driveway without having to ride the clutch etc.

Being able to do this would mean more to me than 10-20kws at 4000rpm and WOT.

so it really depends on what you want to do with the car.

Hence why I didn't go some stupidly large cams. I got a power increase at every single RPM point after doing the headwork/cams. (One of my old threads is kicking around somewhere in FI where I posted my results).

I swear most people have no understanding of what "Duration" actually means and just open a catalogue and go "F**k yeah, 280 degrees sounds tuff!".

Hence why I didn't go some stupidly large cams. I got a power increase at every single RPM point after doing the headwork/cams. (One of my old threads is kicking around somewhere in FI where I posted my results).

I swear most people have no understanding of what "Duration" actually means and just open a catalogue and go "F**k yeah, 280 degrees sounds tuff!".

Haha yeah It happens everywhere, I knew a bloke who put a 600thou lift and something with 260odd degrees at .050 cam in his stock 308 and wondered why it made 35hp on the dyno.

I used to have HKS 256/264 cams but sold them becuase my tuner said they were f**ked and couldn't get the car to make power.

Then went Poncams and still my tuner said they were f**ked. Then found out I had a collapsed cat! So should have just kept the HKS cams :(

I saw a mild gain after installing Tomei Poncams on S2 RB25DET. I retained VCT on the intake cam. I did some pulls with/without VCT on and the low/mid torque and spoolup times were significantly different, justifying keeping VCT in my situation. The cams really seem to open up the RB25DET head for further upgrades. The install is not terribly difficult and if you plan on doing more in the future go ahead and upgrade your valve springs while it's out so you can increase your redline. I'm going back to do that now.

Blue line = After Camshaft @ 20 PSI (and smaller exhaust housing on turbo hence quicker spool)

Red line = Before Camshaft @ 18 PSI

Dynosty_Andrew_421whp_2.jpg

I hope this helps you in your decision. I'm pleased with the upgrade.

Edited by radianation

I saw around 40rwhp gain after installing Tomei Poncams on S2 RB25DET. I retained VCT on the intake cam. I did some pulls with/without VCT on and the low/mid torque and spoolup times were significantly different, justifying keeping VCT in my situation. The cams really seem to open up the RB25DET head for further upgrades. The install is not terribly difficult and if you plan on doing more in the future go ahead and upgrade your valve springs while it's out so you can increase your redline. I'm going back to do that now.

What turbo, Manifolds, port work etc, just saying 40rwhp is meaningless without more detail.

You'll see why its meaningless below...

Blue line = After Camshaft @ 20 PSI (and smaller exhaust housing on turbo hence quicker spool)

Red line = Before Camshaft @ 18 PSI

I hope this helps you in your decision. I'm pleased with the upgrade.

How can you even begin to post that and use it as a comparative result?

You've changed the exhaust housing which has altered boost from

18psi @ 5000rpm

to

18psi @ 4200rpm

To me it basically looks like all your gains are from the exhaust housing and nothing else.

True. The comparison dyno chart was not made specifically to test the camshafts, and my other adjustments make it hard to determine what's accurate. If you're not going for big power then you might want to skip on them, but I've not yet hit my goals so they are a step in the right direction.

Again, I hope it helps you make a decision either way. Obviously, you've used my chart to show that there is no reason to upgrade so it's worth something? ; )

Edited by radianation

It's on a dyno.

What some testing did down here was find that cars looked better on the graph, but on the circuit they were slower.

Hence a lot of Racepace cars all went back to stock cams, a few had poncams etc.

so cams won't increase peak power however does shift the powerband, what I don't get is, upgrading would mean going larger than stock, yet response/spool is somehow better than stock down low, how?

I dont think response increases, but midrange power will, the top end wont increase on a smaller turbo eg. Phils GTRS because they are already at max airflow on a stock RB25, a bigger turbo that can flow more air will show gains in the top end.

So throwing some cames at a stock turbo Rb25 will give you nothing apart from a lighter wallet.

Imo I would not change the cams unless I had a .82 GT3076 or larger turbo on the car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
    • Dang, those BBS are so nice! 
×
×
  • Create New...