Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This was after a rough tune - Ben is going to try and flatten our the bump when the VVT comes in - also there another 1300 RPM or so at the top end that need looking at. Like I said, initial tune - Should have another graph next week.

This was at 21 PSI - We should be able to extract another couple of PSI out of her next week too ! :P

dyno1.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34717-initial-results-tune-hks-3040/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Redline - Yeah we are going to muck around with the ECU to try and tune that dip out. Apparently the ECU can do something with the VVT to make it better (that's B-Man technical speak there)

Roy - you know ;)

Steve - yep she hits hard. It's interesting actually - 0-3500 = drving around normally. > 3500 is where it all starts to happen

RBVS - You got it mate - in a nutshell ! 8.5 or 8.6 to 1 - (HKS 1.6 mm head gasket)

Cameron - I took it down the quater last saturday and got two 15 sec runs and fu(ked clutch. :( ha ha New clutch going in now so I might be able to do better than that :D

Just looking at the dyno graph with boost plotted against revs and power:

Boost starts at 3000

3500 = 5 PSI and 80 rwkw

4000 = 8 PSI and 112 rwkw

4500 = 20 PSI and 200rwkw

5000 = 23 PSI and 260 rwkw

5500 = 22.5 PSI and 270 rwkw

6000 = 22 PSI and 310 rwkw

6500 = 21 PSI and 323 rwkw

Thinking about it and comparing against the old Turbo which made 200 rwkw at 9 PSI and 255 rwkw at 15 PSI ( from memory) this one is a laggy hoe. (of course this was a completely different RPM)

It prolly has everything to do with the 1.12 AR exhaust housing ...

However - if we can tune it a bit more and maintain the 300 odd rwkw between 5500 and 8000 rpm - the top end will be the place to drive it.

Means I get the best of both worlds. The quiet NA car between 0-3500 for puttering around town - And the weapon 3500-8000 RPM for the track, drags, off street stuff.

I might look into dropping down an AR or two for a bit of a play as Everything else is the same - just the turbo swap . So I know the zorst, cat, etc is good for better response.

1.12 exhaust housing!!! No wonder it's so laggy!

I was using a 0.87 exhaust housing, and there's also a 1.01 housing, so you're two sizes up from what I was using! :)

3500 = 5 PSI and 80 rwkw

4000 = 8 PSI and 112 rwkw

4500 = 20 PSI and 200rwkw

You have a 90rwkw increase in 500rpm between 3500 and 4000rpm!!! That's gotta make for some traction issues!!!! eek3.gif

I'd love to see what she'll make with more boost (1.6bar isn't enough with that monster exhaust housing) and a proper tune... You're not even revving the thing out yet!!!! Sounds like you have a monster on your hands Brendan! I told you HKS turbos are the goods :)

Are you using the e-boost, B-Man? I thought they were supposed to be the most, 'un-spiking-est' of ebc's? (A-Man technical speak there :))

Peaks to 23psi then trails to 21psi 1500rpm later? Weren't Turbosmart claiming almost 0 spiking with this device @ SEMA?

If you're not using the e-boost then i am way off... but i thought you were...

Adrian

Yes, using e-boost, and yes I don't understand the boost drop off either...... Maybe more wastegate related ?? Dunno...... That's something I will be looking in to ! Also prolly cause it comes on so damn hard - There may be a way with the e-boost to slow down the wastegate hence stabablize the boost.

Cheers,

Merli - What are they efficient to ??? 1.8 bar ???

1.8-1.9 bar I would imagine... Keep turning up the boost until you don't make anymore power with more boost :) You have the engine to support it, so don't be scared to wind it up! :)

Hi Sydneykid - I was wondering that myself - as you can see by my biro markings on the graph - I wanna also know what happens between 6500 and 8000 RPM :)

I've asked them to run it further after final tune.

Knore - I wanted better than 250 rwkw - But I didn't want to stick a T88 on it. - So yeah - It's maybe a little overkill for the track and a bit underkill for drags - A happy medium -

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...