Jump to content
SAU Community

Who Uses Rb26 Power Fc - Need Some Help

want_33

By want_33,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

want_33 Community Regular

want_33

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Trent i dont, i didnt feel comfortable asking you for any more help as i understand your a buisness. Im assuming cause i dont have the software that i probly cant do this myself? Im more than happy to send the power FC to you and pay you if you are willing to help out? also if you could leave the basic rb26 map in it for me? as it currently has a tune for 260kw for a big single and 720cc injectors. the 26 going in will be stock for 6 months or so. Pm me if you can help out so we can sort out some payment. Wish i was closer to you id just drop the bloody car off to you and be done with it.

paulr33 Grand Master

paulr33

Posted
Posted

if its going back to stock a simple DATA INIT will load the default maps, AFM ramps and all the settings

obviously you will loose your current tune if you do this, but thats the sure fire way

or do you just need to revert to stock AFM ramps and keep everything else modified as-is?

its a 5 minute task in datlaogit to load the stock AFM ramps

GTRNUR Grand Master

GTRNUR

Posted
Posted (edited)

Have a look in the folder that you installed FC Edit universal and you will see there is a bunch of maps that get installed with it. There is an R34 GTR RB26 v8.0 something map there as well. You can use the software to open the map offline and get the data that you need that way. All the GTR maf sensors have the same scale so using the R34 map for reference will be fine.

Edited by GTRNUR
  • Like 2
STATUS Grand Master

STATUS

Posted
Posted

Trent i dont, i didnt feel comfortable asking you for any more help as i understand your a buisness. Im assuming cause i dont have the software that i probly cant do this myself? Im more than happy to send the power FC to you and pay you if you are willing to help out? also if you could leave the basic rb26 map in it for me? as it currently has a tune for 260kw for a big single and 720cc injectors. the 26 going in will be stock for 6 months or so. Pm me if you can help out so we can sort out some payment. Wish i was closer to you id just drop the bloody car off to you and be done with it.

where are yo located?

i only ask as i am in and out atm. It would take 5mins to make something up map wise and would be happy to do it. how soon could you get it to me?

blitzkreig Apprentice

blitzkreig

Posted
Posted

Have a look in the folder that you installed FC Edit universal and you will see there is a bunch of maps that get installed with it. There is an R34 GTR RB26 v8.0 something map there as well. You can use the software to open the map offline and get the data that you need that way. All the GTR maf sensors have the same scale so using the R34 map for reference will be fine.

the fc datalogit base map for the rb26 is based on what octane fuel?

GTRNUR Grand Master

GTRNUR

Posted
Posted (edited)

Loading the base map still isnt goin to be ideal. Needs to have a decent tune in it.

+1

The base maps are enough to get your sensor calibrations correct and to drive off boost, but you certainly couldnt drive it on boost.

One other thought... If your going to use twin GTR maf sensors on an ecu with only one MAF sensor input you are going to have a tune stability issue. There is always some difference between the output voltages of both sensors.

The GTR ecu uses a mathmatical calculation that adds the two voltages (maf sensor values) together to work out the actual airflow. You can not do this with the RB20 pfc so the active load point will be off on occasion by at least 1-2 load cells.

Tieing the two maf output signals together will not work. Their values must be read independantly and then processed. Your only option will be to use a single maf sensor, and have a single air input path to the engine.

Edited by GTRNUR
  • Like 1
want_33 Community Regular

want_33

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i was always planning to run the standard ecu, i just read something trent posted that i thought opened my options up a bit. if that much of a problem i will just run the stock ecu.

I was always planning to have it tuned after the power fc install. just assumed it wouldnt run with rb20 tune it... thus asking for the stock 26 map

STATUS Grand Master

STATUS

Posted
Posted

Tieing the two maf output signals together will not work. Their values must be read independantly and then processed. Your only option will be to use a single maf sensor, and have a single air input path to the engine.

ive dioded them up in the past on 1 car, not ideal but from a tune and driveability perspective you would never know. maybe i got lucky but as long as the afm curve is smooth it should be ok.

other option is to run one z32 in the cooler pipe.

J - Rad Veteran

J - Rad

Posted
Posted

Cheers guys. I knew something was different about the 34R PFC, just couldn't quite remember what haha.

Also, worth paying that little bit extra for the new PFC and EL hand controller? Will that fix the missfire that the 32Rs get with the PFC?

STATUS Grand Master

STATUS

Posted
Posted

and the physical loom plug is different, so even if you decide to be super crazy and pin swap, the physical plugs are different

nah they are the same.

PFC negates nats

and cas wires need swapping.

EL Hand controller is the best marketing rort since since Y2k compliant calculators..... i hate them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • Duncan
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Duncan · Posted

      You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      And if you have to drill the oil block, then just drill it for 1/4" and tap it BSP and get a 1/8 to 1/4 BSP bush. The Nissan sender will go straight in and the bush will suit the newly tapped hole. And it will be real strong, to boot.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No it doesn't. It just needs an ezy-out to pull that broken bit of alloy out of the hole and presto chango - it will be back to being a 1/8" hole tapped NPT. as per @MBS206 recco. That would be for making what you had in alloy, in steel. If you wanted to do just that instead of remote mounting like @Duncan and I have been pushing. A steel fitting would be unbreakable (compared to that tragically skinny little alloy adapter). But remote mounting would almost certainly be 10x better. Small engineering shops abound all over the place. A lathe and 10 minutes of time = 2x six packs.
×
×
  • Create New...