Jump to content
SAU Community

Who Uses Rb26 Power Fc - Need Some Help

want_33

By want_33,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

want_33 Community Regular

want_33

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Trent i dont, i didnt feel comfortable asking you for any more help as i understand your a buisness. Im assuming cause i dont have the software that i probly cant do this myself? Im more than happy to send the power FC to you and pay you if you are willing to help out? also if you could leave the basic rb26 map in it for me? as it currently has a tune for 260kw for a big single and 720cc injectors. the 26 going in will be stock for 6 months or so. Pm me if you can help out so we can sort out some payment. Wish i was closer to you id just drop the bloody car off to you and be done with it.

paulr33 Grand Master

paulr33

Posted
Posted

if its going back to stock a simple DATA INIT will load the default maps, AFM ramps and all the settings

obviously you will loose your current tune if you do this, but thats the sure fire way

or do you just need to revert to stock AFM ramps and keep everything else modified as-is?

its a 5 minute task in datlaogit to load the stock AFM ramps

GTRNUR Grand Master

GTRNUR

Posted
Posted (edited)

Have a look in the folder that you installed FC Edit universal and you will see there is a bunch of maps that get installed with it. There is an R34 GTR RB26 v8.0 something map there as well. You can use the software to open the map offline and get the data that you need that way. All the GTR maf sensors have the same scale so using the R34 map for reference will be fine.

Edited by GTRNUR
  • Like 2
STATUS Grand Master

STATUS

Posted
Posted

Trent i dont, i didnt feel comfortable asking you for any more help as i understand your a buisness. Im assuming cause i dont have the software that i probly cant do this myself? Im more than happy to send the power FC to you and pay you if you are willing to help out? also if you could leave the basic rb26 map in it for me? as it currently has a tune for 260kw for a big single and 720cc injectors. the 26 going in will be stock for 6 months or so. Pm me if you can help out so we can sort out some payment. Wish i was closer to you id just drop the bloody car off to you and be done with it.

where are yo located?

i only ask as i am in and out atm. It would take 5mins to make something up map wise and would be happy to do it. how soon could you get it to me?

blitzkreig Apprentice

blitzkreig

Posted
Posted

Have a look in the folder that you installed FC Edit universal and you will see there is a bunch of maps that get installed with it. There is an R34 GTR RB26 v8.0 something map there as well. You can use the software to open the map offline and get the data that you need that way. All the GTR maf sensors have the same scale so using the R34 map for reference will be fine.

the fc datalogit base map for the rb26 is based on what octane fuel?

GTRNUR Grand Master

GTRNUR

Posted
Posted (edited)

Loading the base map still isnt goin to be ideal. Needs to have a decent tune in it.

+1

The base maps are enough to get your sensor calibrations correct and to drive off boost, but you certainly couldnt drive it on boost.

One other thought... If your going to use twin GTR maf sensors on an ecu with only one MAF sensor input you are going to have a tune stability issue. There is always some difference between the output voltages of both sensors.

The GTR ecu uses a mathmatical calculation that adds the two voltages (maf sensor values) together to work out the actual airflow. You can not do this with the RB20 pfc so the active load point will be off on occasion by at least 1-2 load cells.

Tieing the two maf output signals together will not work. Their values must be read independantly and then processed. Your only option will be to use a single maf sensor, and have a single air input path to the engine.

Edited by GTRNUR
  • Like 1
want_33 Community Regular

want_33

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i was always planning to run the standard ecu, i just read something trent posted that i thought opened my options up a bit. if that much of a problem i will just run the stock ecu.

I was always planning to have it tuned after the power fc install. just assumed it wouldnt run with rb20 tune it... thus asking for the stock 26 map

STATUS Grand Master

STATUS

Posted
Posted

Tieing the two maf output signals together will not work. Their values must be read independantly and then processed. Your only option will be to use a single maf sensor, and have a single air input path to the engine.

ive dioded them up in the past on 1 car, not ideal but from a tune and driveability perspective you would never know. maybe i got lucky but as long as the afm curve is smooth it should be ok.

other option is to run one z32 in the cooler pipe.

J - Rad Veteran

J - Rad

Posted
Posted

Cheers guys. I knew something was different about the 34R PFC, just couldn't quite remember what haha.

Also, worth paying that little bit extra for the new PFC and EL hand controller? Will that fix the missfire that the 32Rs get with the PFC?

STATUS Grand Master

STATUS

Posted
Posted

and the physical loom plug is different, so even if you decide to be super crazy and pin swap, the physical plugs are different

nah they are the same.

PFC negates nats

and cas wires need swapping.

EL Hand controller is the best marketing rort since since Y2k compliant calculators..... i hate them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • soviet_merlin
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • niZmO_Man
      Lock up the old for sale / wtb threads.

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • TurboTapin
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By TurboTapin · Posted

      With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...