Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I keep telling you fool!

That rear wheel, housing and gate combo Simon is running WORKS. It is the same rear wheel and housing you have, now get the gate to match! Tial MVR 44mm.

I keep telling you fool!

That rear wheel, housing and gate combo Simon is running WORKS. It is the same rear wheel and housing you have, now get the gate to match! Tial MVR 44mm.

I'm fairly certain that battery also runs the game Tial 44mm MVR

yeah battery has mimmicked your setup part for part..but you are both running a t67 im not..I originally told scott to get the 44 as well now he want let me change my mind..lol

Im not running EBC so correct gate choice is more critical..but im probably over thinking it.. dont matter I will just get the MVR cause it comes with a spring pack and if its right , well I was right all along. But if its wrong I will just blame Scott... ;)

ed...Simon are you using the water cooling on the gate, if so which pipe did you run it off?

What spring and EBC u use.. Would love to know how well it holds boost without EBC..

that will be needed to be done anyway as it only comes with a 38mm ext gate fitting, modding it to take a 40 or 44mm gate isn't that difficult and should't cost much to do and will be something that i'll do with my setup.

however with that being said, i am very curious to see how Jez's setup turns out and looking forward to his results as he is using it with a 38mm gate.

im not just talking about welding a new flange off the ext pipe.

u need 2 cut into the manifold die grind all the shit out and weld new section in there.. anyone with a clue can do it..worth the money trust me.

yeah battery has mimmicked your setup part for part..but you are both running a t67 im not..I originally told scott to get the 44 as well now he want let me change my mind..lol

Im not running EBC so correct gate choice is more critical..but im probably over thinking it.. dont matter I will just get the MVR cause it comes with a spring pack and if its right , well I was right all along. But if its wrong I will just blame Scott... ;)

ed...Simon are you using the water cooling on the gate, if so which pipe did you run it off?

What spring and EBC u use.. Would love to know how well it holds boost without EBC..

Yeh i didn't intentionally copy simons setup, it just sort of happened... pretty sure simon runs the same EBC as me profec b II. I bought the gate and manifold together used for $1100 so not %100 sure on the spring but I think its 1 Bar..

On the subject of cheap manifolds I have had bad experiences in the past with the Stainless items they crack sooooo easy its just not worth the hassle and personally i wouldn't trust an ebay china gate either.

yeah battery has mimmicked your setup part for part..but you are both running a t67 im not..I originally told scott to get the 44 as well now he want let me change my mind..lol

Im not running EBC so correct gate choice is more critical..but im probably over thinking it.. dont matter I will just get the MVR cause it comes with a spring pack and if its right , well I was right all along. But if its wrong I will just blame Scott... ;)

ed...Simon are you using the water cooling on the gate, if so which pipe did you run it off?

What spring and EBC u use.. Would love to know how well it holds boost without EBC..

Don't worry about not running a EBC, just get a gate a few psi less than what you intend to run and then control the rest with a Turbotech $35 job. You will be surprised how well it works, I would run this if I didn't want switchable boost :)

Water cooling for the MVR, not running it... I don't see a need unless it's a full race car maybe. More of a gimmick

I use a 1bar spring and Profec B Spec II (only because I got it cheap second hand, I would rather a blitz dual solenoid)

Did some testing using the Profec B as a boost readout.

Loading it up to 3000rpm/80kph in 4th then going WOT I see 15 psi @ 3400 and then fullboost 20psi @ 3600.

Also had a misfire issue a while back and had to go from 0.8 gap to 0.5 which solved the problem.

Did some testing using the Profec B as a boost readout.

Loading it up to 3000rpm/80kph in 4th then going WOT I see 15 psi @ 3400 and then fullboost 20psi @ 3600.

Also had a misfire issue a while back and had to go from 0.8 gap to 0.5 which solved the problem.

So pretty much exactly the same as mine...

Funny how even on the same type of dyno on the same ramp rate mine appears so much lazier :pirate:

Sorry this is not related to Kando turbos but while your on the topic of wastegates..

Simon, what spring(s) do you have in your 44mm MVR and also; if ur ebc is set to 0% does it boost at the spring pressure till redline or does it creep up a little?

I bought a 1 bar 44mm tial and i hoping it lets my gt35 run 18psi and no more.. will be running poncams too if that means anything in terms of wastegate flow?

Im kinda scared that if it spikes or creeps past 20psi i will have to change the wastegate to a 50mm TS :( I guess we will have to see!

Sorry this is not related to Kando turbos but while your on the topic of wastegates..

Simon, what spring(s) do you have in your 44mm MVR and also; if ur ebc is set to 0% does it boost at the spring pressure till redline or does it creep up a little?

I bought a 1 bar 44mm tial and i hoping it lets my gt35 run 18psi and no more.. will be running poncams too if that means anything in terms of wastegate flow?

Im kinda scared that if it spikes or creeps past 20psi i will have to change the wastegate to a 50mm TS :( I guess we will have to see!

1bar spring... Holds 1 bar :)

Isn't what boost you want to run + rear housing size the main deciding factor with how to choose the gate size?

I dont think you can have too much gate?

Someone correct me if I'm wrong..

I dont think you can have too much gate?

Someone correct me if I'm wrong..

well i thìnk you could be wrong. Too much gate will release too much pressure upon opening and cause boost drop..if you have an EBC it will quickly compensate for this but if you dont the pressure is gone and wont come back till the gate closes again..

You need the correct size gate to release the correct amount of flow to maintain boost...which is why i was undecided between 40 and 44mm as I dont know how much power this turbo will make on stock mnifold.. Was presuming 260 to 280 but some are saying it will make quite a bit more..

Plus the 40mm gate is 330 the 44mm is 380 so Im with snozzle on price being a factor...but 44mm tial comes with 7 different springs so I will get that so i wont need an EBC :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...