Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

TD06-25G is the big brother of the T67-25G

has the same comp cover and wheel with a bigger turbine

TD06-20G is smaller than a t67-25G by using the 20G comp wheel

then there is the TD06-20GL2 Which has the 20G comp and the same small turbine of the T67-25G

Hope you havent had too many beers when trying to work that out hahha

T67 is it what Simon has and no way will it fit low mount td06 is smaller

yeh I have a t67 on mine too, it goes like this in size from small to large:

td06l2-20g

td06(H,SH)-20g

t67-25g

td06-25g

Edited by battery

Well, my TD06-20G is not an L2. I had an L2 but gave it to a friend with my old manifold etc to try. There is an identical RB20 to mine running the same mani/gate and tuner - dyno but L2 and he made 0.5kw less then me on the same boost with almost the exact same response. Mine was actually a bit more responsive. So I dont think there is really a big difference between the TD06 and L2 version of the turbine. The L2 turbine is common with the T67. I am not sure about the TD06H, but i know my TD06-25G is actually a TD06SH-25G. Here are some pics of the TD06L2 vs the TD06SH

med_gallery_462_50_261066.jpg

med_gallery_462_50_26556.jpg

As you can see the TD06SH wheel is a lot bigger

If you need I can take some wheels of the T67-25G wheel on the weekend and also my TD06 wheel. My turbz are all Greddy/Trust jobbies but imagine they are all the same wheels, if not housings

Joel

Send your thanks to Roy

What is a little bigger than the td06sl2 20g and would fit low mount

The "non" L2 version might be able to flow a little more through the turbine, but as per Roys quote above there is SFA difference,

the issue with the T67 not fitting isnt the sheer size of them, but rather the much smaller turbine housing, a spacer plate could be made to suit, as the Comp cover is around GT3582 size, which does fit low mounted to a Rb25.

I would show you pics but some flamin mongrel stole my TD07 last year

isnt the problem that the stock manifold simply wont flow enough for a t67 to do its best...

Thats why i didnt bother with it..

Stao from hypergear said aftermarket manifolds reduced response and didn't increase power at all with his turbos around the 300kw mark.

maybe spend abit more and get a gt3076???

Thats what has to be weighed up, TD06 + ext gate and fabrication may cost more than an Internal gate GT3076 + dump

My case is different due to 1JZ needing a new manifold no matter what

isnt the problem that the stock manifold simply wont flow enough for a t67 to do its best...

Thats why i didnt bother with it..SL2 seemed like a better match..I can always hide a gate..

I tried to fit my t67 on the stock manifold just to see if it would fit but it was hitting engine mounts and A/C lines looked like alot of work and bordering on impossible.

Are you going to plumb the gate back into the exhaust?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
×
×
  • Create New...