Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wait and see what his new housing looks like...

I wouldnt get one of the housings that has the little 3 bolt outlet behind the turbine..

You would want the rear of the turbo to be all open so the WG flow path doesnt interrupt the turbines path. Ive previously emailed him about that and I think they are working on the replacement now.

Iv recently bought one of these turbos td06h-20g going on a rb20 I had mine made custom as i needed the the 8 cm housing no extra charge and came with all fittings and braided lines. With the waste gate you can just cut the welds and tap the bung out then plumb it in I was thinking about it.

Thanks for that. I did send him an email back asking if there are any negatives to the turbo he is offering so we'll see if he's honest :P

Just out of curiosity how much sooner do you think the TD05 would spool over the TD06? Do you think it'd be worth it?

It's hard to find any rb20 TD05 results on the internet. I haven't had any luck finding any apart from a few vids but no figures.

Edited by L0Ki

i asked around everywhere and in the br20 dyno results there was a 20 with a tdo5 only made just over 220 i think and seemed like full boost was around 3600rpm so for 400 more rpm you can have 260+ with the td06h-20g on a 20 all depends on your power goels and if you dont mind waiting to have your neck snaped haha

Your best option in my opinion is a td06l2

I would go the td06h I'm going on the td06l2 with 10cm housing on a 25 so a 8cm housing would be killer on a 20

I have tried both the 10cm and 8cm housing on an RB20 and the 8cm housing is definitely the way to go. That said I suspect a TD05h-18G would be a better bet. A friend had a TD05-20G and it was pretty rubbish. The little TD05 exhaust wheel loses some of its response trying to spin the bigger 20G wheel.

My 2c is decide if you can live with the lag and go TD06-20G or decide to sacrifice 20-30rwkws for more point and shoot and go a TD05-18G. I am constantly on the hunt for a TD05-18G as I suspect with 20psi up it will make for a quick car, often quicker then a car with a TD06-20G

I have tried both the 10cm and 8cm housing on an RB20 and the 8cm housing is definitely the way to go. That said I suspect a TD05h-18G would be a better bet. A friend had a TD05-20G and it was pretty rubbish. The little TD05 exhaust wheel loses some of its response trying to spin the bigger 20G wheel.

My 2c is decide if you can live with the lag and go TD06-20G or decide to sacrifice 20-30rwkws for more point and shoot and go a TD05-18G. I am constantly on the hunt for a TD05-18G as I suspect with 20psi up it will make for a quick car, often quicker then a car with a TD06-20G

Ah Roy, I was waiting for your response, seems as though i got the idea for TD05-18G from your build thread. I think I'll be waiting untill the end of Novemeber than for my Turbo. He even said he can custom make an exhuast housing (or atleast that's what i gathered from his repsonse) on the back of it to bolt directly to the stock flange dump pipe (so there'd be no need to make a vband dump pipe) but i think its best to keep the 3" v band for better flow?

In saying that I'm pretty sure the dump i have now is 3" so wouldn't really matter if that was true. And if the power of the TD05 becomes boring for naother 750 (who knows might be cheaper in a year) you can go to the TD06, as for what i would be doing i think response would be best at this point.

When do you think a TD05-18G would hit full boost by Roy on the 20?

When do you think a TD05-18G would hit full boost by Roy on the 20?

I personally wouldnt be too fussed about when it hits 18psi. Plus there are so many variables. Make sure you have cam gears, no restriction in the exhaust and a good tuner. It will be more responsive then the TD06-20G but the big gain will be in the transient response. The 20G spools from around 3,500rpm and hits 18psi about 500-600rpm later. The 18G may only start spooling say 3,400rpm but because the lower inertia wheels spin quicker and harder you will be seeing 18psi perhaps only 300-400rpm later meaning it gets its boogy on earlier.

If you have a std plenum and cams I expect quite often the car would be quicker then the 20G...now i dont know any of this for a fact but suspect it to be the case so I have been looking for a Trust TD05H-18G for about 18 months now :)

Roy I just want to confirm that both the 18 and 20g compressors have a 68mm OD. In actual fact so does the 16g..

Its the inducer and trim that sets them all apart.

IE the rotating mass of a td06-18g and td06-20g would be down to the last few grams.

You are right. I have copied and pasted the following into spreadsheets over the years:

18G - 50.5mm/68mm ; 55 trim (some places call it a 50 trim...can anyone confirm?)

20G - 52.6mm/68mm ; 60 trim

See the bottom two-right compressor wheels for 18G next to 20G. So not a huge difference but whilst the smaller inducer hurts cfm, it also reduces wheel mass and reduces the moment of inertia

Exhaust side, the TD05 wheel is a good wack smaller

There are two 16Gs, and the smaller wheel has a smaller OD, though the "Big" 16G is the same

post-462-0-79843900-1320235418_thumb.jpg

Roy I just want to confirm that both the 18 and 20g compressors have a 68mm OD. In actual fact so does the 16g..

Its the inducer and trim that sets them all apart.

IE the rotating mass of a td06-18g and td06-20g would be down to the last few grams.

There are two versions of the 16G compressor the big and small wheel. The small wheel version has a 60mm exducer and the big wheel has the 68mm exducer. Just out of interest the T517z runs the big wheel version of the 16G compressor.

With the 20G vs' 18G comparison, even though the wheels exducer sizes are the same the 20G will be trying to move a lot more air even at low shaft speeds. The drive for the moving of the extra air has to come from the turbine which will need more gas flow to achieve the same shaft and hence need higher engine rev's to gain the extra flow. This is why larger trim compressor's are less responsive than their smaller siblings.

P.S. I'll be interested to see how your kando results compare to Trust T518z results. Is there anything done to the head ie. cams etc?

Edited by D_Stirls

Finally got my TD06L2 20G 10cm put on and its awesome!

Same as stock response but better!

Now to get some things done and tuned :)

Just the results I am after! What motor is this on? And what fuel will you be running?

You can see in this video from the weekend that in 3rd gear on a couple of the slower corners I am struggling for a little bit of drive on corner exits....Winton is the reason why I want to get a TD05H-18G to try, et more poke out of the corners. Winton is the toughest circuit for the RB20 running a 20G...but it makes you really work hard to try and carry as much corner speed as possible to keep boost up it

Yeh, yeh... i know i am whoring this vid everywhere :whistling:

I miss Winton.

Looking at the vid though...its kinda hard to tell...but im sure your "laggy little rb20" is pulling harder out of those 3rd gear corners harder than my rb25 with a highflow

While it might not be swinging as hard as it can, it still seems to be pulling well

There are two 16Gs, and the smaller wheel has a smaller OD, though the "Big" 16G is the same

There are two versions of the 16G compressor the big and small wheel. The small wheel version has a 60mm exducer and the big wheel has the 68mm exducer. Just out of interest the T517z runs the big wheel version of the 16G compressor.

P.S. I'll be interested to see how your kando results compare to Trust T518z results. Is there anything done to the head ie. cams etc?

Sorry that much I knew guys, AFAIK the 16g is the 60mm and the 16g6 is the 68mm as far as model numbers go.

I think the T517Z is also a TD05-17c but I would need to look into that again.

The SR in question is an internally standard S13 SR20DE in every way. Will be running Nismo 740s, Z32, Walbro, 450mm china core, 3" tbe and a Nistune. Has been running on a factory T28 and DET tune at 11psi/183rwkw for the last 6 years so the update will be interesting. We are aiming for 250rwkw and it will be tuned at Unigroup.

Theres a guy with an SR in a E36 on youpoop that had a T517z and went to a T518z, I cant remember if he commented he lost a little response or gained a little peak yet the vise versa was unchanged.. I think it was that he lost a little response but I honestly forget. The big T518z cars i see all run 10cm rears on SR's..... Interesting concept.. I myself am dreaming of putting an Evo TS variant on mine (S15 10:1 CR SR20DE), that would be truly dangerous.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...