Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Haha , already in my watch list! , do you think the manifold is worth it chasing only what the std injectors will handle? , i am getting one for my main project (td06 rb20 that will turn into a 25 once the 20 goes pop) , I'm trying my hardest not to get the bug and buy injectors and afm because it will cut into my other project funds! . If i bought a manifold i wouldn't need the kando rear housing either , for ~$150 more it's probably a smart idea? . Shit , now you have me thinking

Big thanks to Blake BSA and Jeremy dvs_jez for their help. These blokes are a legend and always willing to lend a helping hand even on a rainy Saturday.

The boost drop issue has been fixed. To everyone who's doubted the manifold and gate mounting position, keep hating cause it wasn't the issue.

My tuner was a silly mofo, he set the gain too high.

Jez had a look at it after swapping with his tial MVR incase it was my gate that was the issue but turns out it wasn't.

It now holds the boost flat to red line. Tested at 17psi and 21psi.

The whole experience has left me very disappointed in my trusted tuner whom I've used for the past 4years.

For all tuning needs on the central coast in syd, contact dvs_jez and for all fabrication work, contact BSA, he's based in the gong and does work there, syd and central coast.

Gotta love full boost by 3700rpm :D

It's going in for finishing tune at 21-22psi in 3weeks so will have dyno sheetsresults then.

The boost drop issue has been fixed. To everyone who's doubted the manifold and gate mounting position, keep hating cause it wasn't the issue.

:thumbsup: Hope it blazes the tyres and makes the power you are chasing. Hope the tuner is eating some humble pie and his pricing reflects his oversight :whistling:

just checking what you guys think, for my RB25(I posted more info a few pages earlier) , since kando/kinugawa dont do a 10cm 3bolt mitsu rear housing to suit my trust manifold, Im trying to decide between 2 options now

option 1

buy a td06sl2 20g 8cm

option 2

recore my existing td06 20g and replace the rear 14cm housing with a 12cm which kinugawa sell

Depending what there like with those rear housings I will try and get a 10cm rear to replace at a later date.

what do you think the better option is?

I have a td06 20g 14cm that the rear seal has gone in, it made over 300rwkw (just) but was a bit laggy or drift.

So I was going to buy a new chra instead of rebuilding and then I considered upgrading to the td06sl2 20g and smaller turbine housing.

That's where I am now, not worth selling the kit as its already setup for it. All I have to do is bolt on and

Drive away :) oh and tune :(

Edited by JLTS13

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...