Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

3540 shaft snapped in half and the Kando cost less than just a core for the garrett.

essencially the same engine apart from new injectors, rochester 1000's and a the T67, it is spooling up heaps earlier than the 3540, around 1000-1500 rpm earlier which makes me think its the housing.

thats quite early but i think the 8cm would be even earlier.

take a few photos of the rear housing, i am fairly confident i can tell the difference. Take pics from around the flange area.

im fairly certain that a 10cm housing has more of a taper on the exit side of the T3 flange than it does on the CHRA side, whereas an 8cm has the same amount of taper from the flange on both sides and the snail shell is a little thinner.

This is my observation but im not honestly sure this is correct!

The genuine garrett .82 will be better suited. The .73 (10cm) kando housing is a tiny thing.

There are also better options available for that sort of power when talking 'responsive' and 400kw on a dirty thirty. Bare in mind a 35R is similar in size to a precision 6262.

A bush bearing PT can be had for roughly 1k delivered, and would be a hands down winner if you went for the T4 TS option. Single gate to keep costs low will still work a treat.

Finally here is a couple of pics of my turbo housing, i think it is a 10cm but it is just too small for my 25/26 with cams. We ended up getting 275RWKW out of it at 20psi on BP ultimate. It spools up to full song at 3500 and starts to drop off around 6000. It is very good to drive but we were pretty disappointed at the power output.

post-2388-0-18249500-1353379281_thumb.jpg

post-2388-0-39146500-1353379290_thumb.jpg

Simon, i suggest waiting to see how i go before getting the T67.

Finally here is a couple of pics of my turbo housing, i think it is a 10cm but it is just too small for my 25/26 with cams. We ended up getting 275RWKW out of it at 20psi on BP ultimate. It spools up to full song at 3500 and starts to drop off around 6000. It is very good to drive but we were pretty disappointed at the power output.

post-2388-0-18249500-1353379281_thumb.jpg

post-2388-0-39146500-1353379290_thumb.jpg

Simon, i suggest waiting to see how i go before getting the T67.

Worst pictures ever haha But I think it's a 10cm by the looks

In that case I can almost guarantee you something is wrong with your set up and not the turbo... These things don't drop off at high revs, we went well past 8000rpm with mine and power was still going north.

You are about 50rwkw down on where you should be... Got a graph?

Looking for a Kando for my 26/30. Has anyone got any thoughts on this? Basically a 3582r with .73 rear housing. Want to make a responsive 400 rwkw http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com.au/viewitem?itemId=120892863434

Hey Simon, I got a Kando TD06H-25g with the biggest houseing they make on my neo 25/30. It's not tuned above 5000rpm cos I need to replace my wastegate ( I'm not doing it untill my new 4wd arrives). To compare I had a Hypergear Gt3576 that made about 370rwhp on Ultimate 98 on Hyperdrive's dyno (In WA). With my rev limit set at 4500rpm I think I could safely say that the new kando turbo is massivly more powerful and massively more responsive.

I have herd of people running T67's on 3L's but I honestly reckon that it would be happier with the slightly bigger TD06H-25G.

But that all being said my car isn't fully tuned so I ahve no idea when it will stop making power.

The genuine garrett .82 will be better suited. The .73 (10cm) kando housing is a tiny thing.

There are also better options available for that sort of power when talking 'responsive' and 400kw on a dirty thirty. Bare in mind a 35R is similar in size to a precision 6262.

A bush bearing PT can be had for roughly 1k delivered, and would be a hands down winner if you went for the T4 TS option. Single gate to keep costs low will still work a treat.

i know nothing about the PT turbos.. just did some reading up on them.. looks to be the goods! might go with a 6262 i reckon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...