Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah but these will go on standard manifold etc. im not sure i wanna peeve around with high mount anymore and just whack these on a standard manny with some corn fuel

Stock manifold you want a L2 20G, the T67 wont fit and the TD06H lag won't have a payoff.

ARTZ has a 20G lowmounted on his car, correct me if I am wrong but given his time again I believe he would go a HG highflow? The cost to benefit ratio isnt high enough.

My recommendation is the July 13 spec 2IU highflow from HG with a 3" comp housing.

Stock manifold you want a L2 20G, the T67 wont fit and the TD06H lag won't have a payoff.

ARTZ has a 20G lowmounted on his car, correct me if I am wrong but given his time again I believe he would go a HG highflow? The cost to benefit ratio isnt high enough.

My recommendation is the July 13 spec 2IU highflow from HG with a 3" comp housing.

those had crossed my mind tho im not sure the value for money is there v the kando.

Do you know the wheel specs on the HG versions? not much details on them

I know a fair amount about them, perhaps best to discuss via PM.

Value for money you are better off going with the HG mate. A 'bolt on' kando will cost 700, only 150 less than a HG bolt on and you get very limited after sales support. Stao is in Melbourne and answers the phone at midnight to talk about turbos.

Follow his thread and you will see the jaw dropping customer service he provides, its worth the money on its own. Anyway, if you are taking the mods seriously I will expect to see a PM :P And you are in Sydney so we should tee up and talk shop :thumbsup:

I know a fair amount about them, perhaps best to discuss via PM.

Value for money you are better off going with the HG mate. A 'bolt on' kando will cost 700, only 150 less than a HG bolt on and you get very limited after sales support. Stao is in Melbourne and answers the phone at midnight to talk about turbos.

Follow his thread and you will see the jaw dropping customer service he provides, its worth the money on its own. Anyway, if you are taking the mods seriously I will expect to see a PM :P And you are in Sydney so we should tee up and talk shop :thumbsup:

pm has been sent.

main thing is value v power v budget

yeah I'd get stao new turbo for sure...ease of fitment and kw per $ its a clear winner...

if i already had a top mount setup and just needed a replacment turbo I may be tempted to save a few bucks and get the Kando...If not just go HG...might even get one myself so i am a little less worried about defects :P

yeah I'd get stao new turbo for sure...ease of fitment and kw per $ its a clear winner...

if i already had a top mount setup and just needed a replacment turbo I may be tempted to save a few bucks and get the Kando...If not just go HG...might even get one myself so i am a little less worried about defects :P

HG SS4 alpha - high mount external gate, 400rwkw on jungle juice ;)

may aswell just go 6262 and be done with it in that instance..

so as far as the questions at hand know one knows much about the 9 / 11 blade variants??

Roy has tried both afaik on his little 20

hopefully he'll poke his head in

may aswell just go 6262 and be done with it in that instance..

so as far as the questions at hand know one knows much about the 9 / 11 blade variants??

whats it going on an rb25 and what do you want from it?

sl2 is a midrange weapon..power form 3000-6500 and will hold it, suits the 25 perfectly...

t67 has more top end so power from 4000 if you wanna rev to 7500,

tdo6h is all top end..4500-8500..

just depends where you want your power...

personally I still say get staos hiflow turbo..860$ .will pull close to 350 on Efuel...looks stock....how can you lose...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...