Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Warranty is the biggest issue here having to pay $160 for postage and then another $160 if u don't want your turbo to be abandoned in case the workshop in Taiwan is closed then the most likely chance of paying a further $350 when they decide not to warrant the warranty. I think taos ss3 makes more power and response then these anyway and is in Australia. Well around around the corner for me, which makes everything everything that much easier and safer just a word of warning for anyone wanting to get one

Always worth updating the thread - interesting to hear, though strange it's contrary to years of use by people here! A mate had to return something along the line too, when they supplied an 18G instead of a 16G - and they sorted him out quickly... the customer service for folks I know overall hasn't been bad, did they give a reason as to why they didn't honour the warranty?

In some cases I would potentially take Hypergear more seriously as an option if I lived in Oz too, but in NZ Kando Dynamics makes more sense cost wise and in terms of knowing what you are going to get.

The comments seem to indicate that warranty has been honoured in each instance - correct?

Consumer having to wear the $160 shipping cost is not so good but if Kando have rebuilt/repaired at their cost I feel it's hard to have a gripe.

360 degree thrust bearings have been the way to upgrade turbo reliability since Adam was a boy - I seem to recall there is some sort of option along those lines available from Kinugawa?

Good good :) Occurred to me recently a lot of people seem to be getting failures over there and I was shocked to find "no BOV" was a trend in Oz. AFAIK (could be wrong?) thrust bearings get hammered when you get compressor surge, which would be massive without a BOV.

Good good :) Occurred to me recently a lot of people seem to be getting failures over there and I was shocked to find "no BOV" was a trend in Oz. AFAIK (could be wrong?) thrust bearings get hammered when you get compressor surge, which would be massive without a BOV.

A lot of people getting failures? Or people getting a lot of failures? :ph34r:

  • Like 1

Heard of 2 people today having exactly the same problems with a td06. Seems like the first few batches at at the start where made perfectly then once his name got bigger the quality control has gone down hill. Happens a lot with a lot of big brand stuff

I get to work on them often, the shaft and bearing below came off a Kando T67 sent in last week, like I've mentioned earlier. This issue happens to T67 or those larger billet L2 based cores working with Rb25det engines on high boost. When compressor out flows turbine creating way too much back pressure.

bearings.JPG

That's interesting. Any theory on why SimonR32 (first post: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/347726-kando-dynamics-turbo/) has been running the T67 25G for years without issues?

Thanks for providing input - I would definitely like to know if reliability has changed or is worse than previously evidenced from this thread, as I definitely don't want to be recommending a product which is going to cause people issues. In saying that, again I'm not like to recommend mismatched turbos to people anyway... so the likes of a TD05-16G6/TD06SL2-20G/TD06-25G should be comparatively safe?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...