Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Got rid of the old paper job and dropped in a K&N filter yesterday. I'm probably imagining it but it feels a little bit more responsive on the pedal. :woot:

Nah, I reckon they make a noticeable difference too.

Finally got some time to fit the greddy oil cooler to the car.....only problem is I am having to move the power steering cooler! :(

Other than needing new tyres and a power steering cooler......also the new rear wing the car is safe to go to the track finally.

Finally got some time to fit the greddy oil cooler to the car.....only problem is I am having to move the power steering cooler! :(

Other than needing new tyres and a power steering cooler......also the new rear wing the car is safe to go to the track finally.

I thought Scotty had said his oil cooler makes no real difference?

Oh, and to my Stagea, this weekend I finally got the wideband bung welded in, so just need to wire it up now. Also getting closer to sorting the Fcon out, looking to change some of the wiring around to run the HKS sensors instead of the stockers.

I thought Scotty had said his oil cooler makes no real difference?.

No real difference to performance that is correct!....however the temps generated at full song on a track are a little different....every bit helps. Even if I only do 3 lap sprints "at my pace" on short tracks and it keeps the temps down it will be great. My only stuff up today was that I didn't put the sensor in the sandwich play before filling the oil.

Edited by Jetwreck

Definitely need the oil cooler for the track, as well as a huge trans cooler and the power steering. Not much room left in the front of mine now. With a massive 30 row oil cooler that has a 14 inch thermo mounted to it, my oil still got to 110 degrees at PI, the water hovered around 91 with the stock radiator.

My car let me down today. :( The throttle became unresponsive and I had to crawl home at 20-30kph. (after pulling the throttle plug for some more revs.) I suspected Leon's cruse at first so I disconnected it, no change. Swapped the throttle pedal over, still the same. I even pulled the ecu plug and checked the loom, no problems. It turned out to be the throttle body itself which is unusual, I haven't heard of one failing before. At least I have a few laying around I guess. The best part is it idles on 700 again instead of 1000 revs. Win.

I think the tps shat itself, it read 2.5v continuously at idle. I guess it was in limp mode but I didn't have to reset anything once the new throttle was in... I had a similar experience at PI, had to pit as the car wouldn't rev. It ran fine again once I restarted the car.

Dropped the oil yesterday - well, I started on Sat - but after putting the oil flush in I couldn't find the extra 2L of 300v...and shops were closed..so had to finish it off on Sunday.

Anyway, its good to be driving again.... :banana:

I thought Scotty had said his oil cooler makes no real difference?

Oh, and to my Stagea, this weekend I finally got the wideband bung welded in, so just need to wire it up now. Also getting closer to sorting the Fcon out, looking to change some of the wiring around to run the HKS sensors instead of the stockers.

Unless you want to be looking at a constant CEL and an unhappy ECU, I'd be leaving the stock sensors in as well as running the Fcon sensors.

Unless you want to be looking at a constant CEL and an unhappy ECU, I'd be leaving the stock sensors in as well as running the Fcon sensors.

I mentioned that, but apparently you can set it up so the F-con only reads the input from the sensors as they're fed into the stock ECU.

Can't run both apparently.

Which sensors?

I run both, I just cut the wire at the fcon end and can swap between them with bullet connectors. The stock ecu still gets the stock sensor signal as the patch loom goes straight through.

Cam, what were my errors again? I am keen to get rid of them all now. I remember the stock o2 was missing...

I mentioned that, but apparently you can set it up so the F-con only reads the input from the sensors as they're fed into the stock ECU.

Can't run both apparently.

I didn't unplug any OEM sensors when I ran the Fcon as I didn't want the damn CEL on all the time.

I'm sure the Fcon can be set up to read the HKS IAT and MAP sensors and ignoring the ECU's feedback for these.

Cam, what were my errors again? I am keen to get rid of them all now. I remember the stock o2 was missing...

Buggered if I know. Like there is a chance I'm remembering the one that couldn't be removed - let alone the one that were removed!

Buggered if I know. Like there is a chance I'm remembering the one that couldn't be removed - let alone the one that were removed!

I'm glad i'm not the only one with a failing memory. :P

I don't know how it works. The guys are modifying the harness to take the HKS sensors and have looked at the VQ25DET ECU pin out to get it all working. I'll see how it goes when it's on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Stock RB fuel pressure is near enough 43.5 psi, so the latency in that table at 31.6 will be close. You can see that 7 or 8 psi equates to about 0.4µs extra latency. So if you wanted to interpolate between the 31.6 and 39.9 psi values you could say you're going up about 2 psi out of those 8, so add about 0.1µs, which is barely worth talking about and is quite possibly wrong because ideally you would fix the latency while running at the appropriate conditions on the dyno, with a wideband sniffing its butt.
    • The pressure, is what you set the fuel pressure to. If you have the factory fuel reg, you'll need to find the factory spec. I don't know it off the top of my head, but someone else might.
    • For others, what GTSBoy states here should be paid attention. Why? Well lots of people play with different engines, and they LOVE to change things like remove AC, or steering pumps etc, and it lends to them needing to move the tensioner too. You want your tensioner, particularly those that are sprung or hydraulically tensioned, to be the first thing after the harmonic balancer, or technically the "last" pulley in the chain. By saying last pulley, I mean look at the direction the crank spins when the engine is running, follow the belt from where the crank is pulling the belt FROM, and keep following that until you're between the last pulley/accessory on the belt and about to reach the crank again, this is the spot where you put the tensioner. This is the area that will always end up with slack. This is worked out exactly the same way for chains too, as the physics is the same for them. The crank pulley is where all the force to drag the belt around comes from. You will never ever get rid of the slack that appears, especially under load. The tensioners job is to keep the belt loose enough when stationary that there shouldn't be out of sync movement in slow movement, and then be tight enough when running, that the belt can't jump off any gear and get damaged. Too tight, bad things happen, too loose, bad things happen. Have a tensioner (mainly sprung/hydraulic one) in the wrong spot, it can't actually do anything about keeping the tension.
    • It was gonna take much longer for the 440cc so I'd thought I'd risk it with the 550cc. They finally arrived and I couldn't wait any longer (I could but I was quite excited after 2 months) and installed them myself. Removed the old injectors, inserted the new and connected everything up. Before starting the car, I tuned the injector size from the factory 270cc to 550cc using Nistune.   This did some of the calculations automatically which catered for the TIM. The latency however did not seem to change. Deatschwerks have the tuning data available for each injector online, and I had a look at it. It has a table which relates to latency according to pressure and voltage (see below image). Nistune requires the 14v value, but I am unsure of which pressure value to look at (my lack of knowledge and experience have something to do with this). The highlighted value is close to my current latency which is 760µs. It is for 14v which makes sense, and the pressure is 31.6 Psi.   I still gave the car a test drive to see how it goes, and honestly it has never felt so powerful before (and some people say the RB20DE is very weak?). I really enjoyed the drive. Side note; The injectors are quite noisy, which someone mentioned before. This does not really bother me however. I will still ask my mechanic to have a look at it and perhaps ask a tuner to fine tune it if they have the knowledge.
    • Also true. But imagine not wanting new injectors? Imagine wanting to use 30 year old injectors?
×
×
  • Create New...