Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So there was a write up to the changes to the stagea model and the reasons behind why they relocated the springs the way they have.

It went something along the lines that the ability to separate springs to the shocks was to allow the cargo compartment not to be hindered by higher strut towers and the ability to displace the load under stress. I may be wrong in my understanding but would it also mean the design of a shock and spring system wouldn't allow enough rebound or loading of the compartment?

When I bought my MCA I thought (incorrectly) that all M35 coilover kits converted the rear to a proper coilover and also that MCA is a well know/respected brand that make quality products and wouldn't sell something dangerous and/or of inferior quality. Along with reaperblitz I thought the change in suspension was to make room for larger compartment not due to load sharing, after all OEM springs are generally quite a lot larger in diameter than aftermarket coilovers hence would require a large shock tower which would take space away from the rear compartment.

Been trying to find all these failed shock mounts on MCA equiped M35's. No luck yet. I did find this though: http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440310-coilover-issue/Both ARX, one with stock suspension, one with aftermarket, both look like the bolts pulled out rather than a problem with compression forces. One due to incorrect adjustment of the shock and one due to loose mounting nuts by the sound of it. You can also see the damper adjuster in one pic exposed to the elements and covered in road grime. If you pull away the interior trim you will see a very strong, reinforced, well engineered C pillar which by chance is what the shock mount forces are applied to. I'll go with an expert, say like someone who builds suspension for a living rather than speculation of what might happen. I'm sure Mr Nissan knew what he was doing but if they got it right from the factory then why would we bother modifying our cars at all. On another note you can specify what springs you want at no extra cost with MCA and don't have to change the large spring again which is a PITA. If you are happy with your BCs, awesome but don't bash the MCAs just because you reckon.

Been trying to find all these failed shock mounts on MCA equiped M35's. No luck yet. I did find this though: http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440310-coilover-issue/Both ARX, one with stock suspension, one with aftermarket, both look like the bolts pulled out rather than a problem with compression forces. One due to incorrect adjustment of the shock and one due to loose mounting nuts by the sound of it. You can also see the damper adjuster in one pic exposed to the elements and covered in road grime. If you pull away the interior trim you will see a very strong, reinforced, well engineered C pillar which by chance is what the shock mount forces are applied to. I'll go with an expert, say like someone who builds suspension for a living rather than speculation of what might happen. I'm sure Mr Nissan knew what he was doing but if they got it right from the factory then why would we bother modifying our cars at all. On another note you can specify what springs you want at no extra cost with MCA and don't have to change the large spring again which is a PITA. If you are happy with your BCs, awesome but don't bash the MCAs just because you reckon.

Not bashing at all; there's no question about Josh's product, nor his knowledge.

However; regardless of how well reinforced you might think the shock mount is; I don't believe it was ever designed to support the entire corner of the car on that tiny little sheetmetal cup bolted to the bodywork.

Not speculation; fact.

Not bashing at all; there's no question about Josh's product, nor his knowledge.

However; regardless of how well reinforced you might think the shock mount is; I don't believe it was ever designed to support the entire corner of the car on that tiny little sheetmetal cup bolted to the bodywork.

Not speculation; fact.

"I don't believe" = fact? Interesting.

Show me the evidence.

"I don't believe" = fact? Interesting.

Show me the evidence.

A shock mount is not designed to hold weight its sole purpose is to control the spring. The spring on the other hand does hold the weight of the corner of car

I think i quoted wrong person anyhoo

Edited by stripey

"I don't believe" = fact? Interesting.

Show me the evidence.

Yeah, semantics; wrote it in a hurry, and thought about it later.

Still not fit for purpose; otherwise Nissan would've just put the whole lot there.

Every strut top I've ever seen or worked with has a hell of a lot more surface area to distribute the load; this arrangement does nothing of the sort. Instead, it localises the entire corner weight of the vehicle on a tiny unsupported piece of sheetmetal spotwelded over a void in the body.

There is absolutely no benefit or performance advantage in combining the spring and shock into one position in this instance; and avoiding using the specifically designed and reinforced spring perch is just an exercise in simplifying his parts bin because he now doesn't need to have custom wound mini-block springs as per OEM.

He can just use his off the shelf small diameter coilover spec springs to maximise his profit.

I stand by my comment, but you are free to do whatever you choose.

Just out of clarity (until I can find the actual reason/ information) m35 rwd is different suspension than the m35 4wd yes?

But the chassis is pretty much the same minus the subframe?

M35 shares its front suspension with the Z33 and V35; the rear suspension and subframe is identical between NM35 and M35

http://www.nissan-global.com/EN/NEWS/2001/_STORY/011016-01.html

Suspension: Featuring a new multi-link rear suspension designed specifically for wagon application

The new Stagea employs four wheel multi-link suspension and realizes superior handling, stability and ride comfort.

Its rear suspension is a newly developed multi-link rear suspension that has the coil springs mounted separately from the shock absorbers and lowers the upper attachment position of the shock absorbers by 270 mm compared with the suspension on the previous model. As a result, this dedicated wagon suspension minimizes intrusions into the luggage area.

Ripple-control shock absorbers are used to isolate the transmission of minute vibrations from the road surface for improved tire-road contact.

*Still can't find the type of multi link system explanation

http://nissan.epcdata.ru/stagea/nm35/6839-vq25det/trans/431/

Edited by Reaperblitz

Thanks for clearing that up Daleo. Slightly off topic. Why would they sell different kits to cater for the 4wd compared to the rwd? Added weight of attEsa system?

they sell different kit as the front suspension is slightly different in the front ie the way the coil over is mounted and its style as it has the front drive shafts in the way of where the lower mounts are

Yeah, semantics; wrote it in a hurry, and thought about it later.

Still not fit for purpose; otherwise Nissan would've just put the whole lot there.

Every strut top I've ever seen or worked with has a hell of a lot more surface area to distribute the load; this arrangement does nothing of the sort. Instead, it localises the entire corner weight of the vehicle on a tiny unsupported piece of sheetmetal spotwelded over a void in the body.

There is absolutely no benefit or performance advantage in combining the spring and shock into one position in this instance; and avoiding using the specifically designed and reinforced spring perch is just an exercise in simplifying his parts bin because he now doesn't need to have custom wound mini-block springs as per OEM.

He can just use his off the shelf small diameter coilover spec springs to maximise his profit.

I stand by my comment, but you are free to do whatever you choose.

Fair enough. Only time will tell. Just trying to support local and hoping that people don't confuse opinion with fact when deciding on their purchase. All good.

  • Like 1

Fair enough. Only time will tell. Just trying to support local and hoping that people don't confuse opinion with fact when deciding on their purchase. All good.

I've only heard fantastic things about his product; everyone raves about them, and also Josh's product support and knowledge. I have absolutely no axe to grind with MCA at all.

That's why I'm completely mystified by the choice to mount them this way.

TBH; I hope they never have any kind of failure, no customer deserves that, and Josh certainly doesn't either.

This is more than just here mate. This was all mentioned to josh on facebook with concerns and links to the fail as he was developing. Not taking away what he offers what so ever as his profuct has been proven in time attack for years. Im this application this is a big weak point unless the m35 owner sends his/her car to an engineer to strengthen the area in question. 99% of owners wont as this cost plus suspension cost will outweigh other products on the market. And this is not from someone against his product as numerous times i have said i will be keen on MCA blues once i wait to see if current owners running MCAs have this mount cracking/failing in which it eventually will as it has happrned running the BC coilovers set up.

Agree. The shock mount is not designed to take the full weight of the rear.

Different car and setup; In my trucking days there were plenty of people using coilovers on the standard Shock mounts in conjunction with 4 links. Some swore it was fine, but seeing a few fail showed me otherwise.

G35 and 350z with purdy adjustable arms and a Datto 1600 all deleting the factory spring to run a true coilover and they all run more of a shock tower rather than having the mount incorporated into the base of the c pillar. Just sayin'. I wish I had found these damper adjuster extensions (so you don't need to remove the trim) earlier in my research so I could have got away with a smaller access hole in the already weak, flimsy mount. :P

post-135423-0-58039900-1454538431_thumb.jpgpost-135423-0-59756200-1454538450_thumb.jpgpost-135423-0-41492600-1454538471_thumb.jpgpost-135423-0-51704400-1454538833_thumb.jpg

Just looked at the difference. The spring sits on the platform that attaches to the rear end of the brake hub. The modified version uses an adjustable brace? Wouldn't that need to be certified as you're changing the design engineering of the suspension? I.e there's no downward support for where it used to sit?

Just curious- Please entertain the thought process in this

Just looked at the difference. The spring sits on the platform that attaches to the rear end of the brake hub. The modified version uses an adjustable brace? Wouldn't that need to be certified as you're changing the design engineering of the suspension? I.e there's no downward support for where it used to sit?

Just curious- Please entertain the thought process in this

Gives more accurate toe adjustment rather than slotting the subframe.

post-135423-0-02068000-1454544861_thumb.jpg

Thought this was pretty cool if you want to keep the separate spring and shock.

post-135423-0-09812000-1454544887_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...