Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sell the car and buy one with 270kw, it'll cost you a couple of grand max, doing it yourself will cost $5-6k on the cheap and then stuff goes bust and there are hidden costs, probably be more like $10k once youve fixed all the broken stuff and got it 100% how you want.

You could end up with a brand new forged engine, turbo, suspension blah blah for only $2-3k if you just sell it and buy someone else's money pit.

+1

I was going to write practically the same thing.

If you have a good nick, practically stock S2 33, you will be able to sell it for close on the same price as one with a lot of the fruit done already.

We all have the desire to "do it all" ourselves but at the end of the day its not always worth it.

I bought my R32 GTS-T with a lot of fruit but still with room to make it "your own". If you get one that is mostly stock cosmetically you can always throw money at the cosmetics instead. This way you've got the fun of driving a powerful version of the car you like while making it suit your style. Cosmetics are dope if you have the power to go with it.

The fact that you are asking a car forum whether you should modify you car means you want to do it and are looking for reinforcement :)

I think you should save your pennies, get a nice share portfolio, put a deposit on a house... PYSCH! ONLY JOKING!

MOD IT! MOD IT! MOD IT!

I love my R34 with 280rwkw!

How much did you spend on your car bro?

Theres two type of car people, one are the ones that love moding the car themselves gaining experience and learning from the work they do themselves and then the satisfaction of driving it with good results knowing you build it then there are the 2nd type who just care about driving it and want the car to be fast and couldnt care less who did the work as long as it works.

So if your the first type then definately mod it yourself and have fun but if you the 2nd type then as others said go buy one thats ready. I myself would have no enjoyment in just buying 1000hp car and driving I love the fact that I have build my car over 3 years on my own and gone throw the highs and lows but in the end when it all comes together and runs its the best feeling knowing you worked through it and finally got there so yeah you dont really care about the money you spend aslong as you got it your happy to spend on the car.

Gottta say just get the stock turbo maxed out first. 190rwkws is alot funner to drive around then 160. Will spin the wheels easily in first on stock wheels. And second if your not pointing the steering wheel anything but directly straight.

Only need:

FMIC

Full exhaust

Boost controller

Fuel pump (not needed but is highly recomended)

Aftermarket Ecu (probably, some people can get away without it at this power level, some cant.)

Tune + dyno

= 190-200 rwkws

From there its only a couple more mods to your desired power level.

Gottta say just get the stock turbo maxed out first. 190rwkws is alot funner to drive around then 160. Will spin the wheels easily in first on stock wheels. And second if your not pointing the steering wheel anything but directly straight.

Only need:

FMIC

Full exhaust

Boost controller

Fuel pump (not needed but is highly recomended)

Aftermarket Ecu (probably, some people can get away without it at this power level, some cant.)

Tune + dyno

= 190-200 rwkws

From there its only a couple more mods to your desired power level.

I was dyno'd at 183rwkw with just FMIC & full exhaust. Recently changed my R34 turbo actuator over to an R32 10psi actuator, it feels even quicker. I imagine when I get my nistune actually tuned, I should be pushing well over 200rwkw ..

I certainly plan to find the limits of the factory turbo before I upgrade it...

I was dyno'd at 183rwkw with just FMIC & full exhaust. Recently changed my R34 turbo actuator over to an R32 10psi actuator, it feels even quicker. I imagine when I get my nistune actually tuned, I should be pushing well over 200rwkw ..

I certainly plan to find the limits of the factory turbo before I upgrade it...

you will make ~190kw with the stock turbo max.

270/280 kw's is almost double the output from the factory, Does it double the fun. Bet your life it does.

I watched my bud (Lazy bastard) develop his 33 to those levels with all the right supporting mods, suspension etc While I went on trying to build a monster.

I envied the fun he had in that car, It went like shit off a shovel, Could hand out pain to most things it ever came up against and was as reliable as a swiss watch. His world came crashing down when He decided to go all out, the ensuing pain that only those of us who have done it can understand was enough to have him part out the car and move on to an Evo but still wishing he never touched what was a dynamite combo.

I have my 33 which is now beyond being a street car so I am developing a 33 gtr using his gtst as a blueprint. Safe reliable power and a shit load of fun.

Will you lose money, Of course you will! Will it be worth it, If your asking me, Darn straight it will be.

  • Nope 1

I was dyno'd at 183rwkw with just FMIC & full exhaust. Recently changed my R34 turbo actuator over to an R32 10psi actuator, it feels even quicker. I imagine when I get my nistune actually tuned, I should be pushing well over 200rwkw ..

I certainly plan to find the limits of the factory turbo before I upgrade it...

You'll end up frying your turbo.

you will make ~190kw with the stock turbo max.

You'll end up frying your turbo.

.... yeah... no.

You guys not read the dyno threads or something? Turbo was pushing 183rkw at 7psi of boost... Turbo is good for what - 10-12psi? Plenty of people in the dyno thread pushing 215-220rwkw on an R34 turbo (10-11psi).

OP was talking R33 - so not entirely the same, but still - you're not making much sense to me.

LOL yeah was basically asking him to prove to himself that paying for 112 extra kw is not cheap!

Or you could get a Powerchip. 112 extra Kw's for only a mild $112,000

that is the cheapest and best way to mod a performance car :rofl2:

I'll keep mine for a little while longer, save my pennies and probably just end up buying a 33 gtr.

lol, an even bigger money pit... you gota spend it on something i spose.

GTR cost more to work on for a couple of reasons, one of which is the GTR badge. But mostly there is just

more 'stuff' going on in a GTR. If you insist, please make sure it doesn't have the original turbos.

PFC $1,300

Tune $600

FMIC (black jjr turnflow) $500

Turbotech T $70

Cat $170

Front/Dump Pipe $200

There is 200-220rwkw. That is just a figure at the top. The bottom end and mid range will shit all over the stock tune. This will make

the car much much faster. Then go the hog with a 3071/2835 laters.

After driving a couple of fmic, exhaust only cars around with a mate while he was looking for a stockish cheapy a couple of weeks ago. They are..I mean...you can have fun

but its nothing compared to 195rwkw with stock trubo and no were near 215rwkw with highflow. The torque difference is where its at, not the end figure.

270/280 kw's is almost double the output from the factory, Does it double the fun. Bet your life it does.

I watched my bud (Lazy bastard) develop his 33 to those levels with all the right supporting mods, suspension etc While I went on trying to build a monster.

I envied the fun he had in that car, It went like shit off a shovel, Could hand out pain to most things it ever came up against and was as reliable as a swiss watch. His world came crashing down when He decided to go all out, the ensuing pain that only those of us who have done it can understand was enough to have him part out the car and move on to an Evo but still wishing he never touched what was a dynamite combo.

I have my 33 which is now beyond being a street car so I am developing a 33 gtr using his gtst as a blueprint. Safe reliable power and a shit load of fun.

Will you lose money, Of course you will! Will it be worth it, If your asking me, Darn straight it will be.

Totally agree.

Once you get the "itch" and start chasing 300rwkw+, most of the time it gets very expensive and painful.

End results are good, but you always think "what if i just stayed with less than 300"

Iv spent just on $6k in the past 3 months, hypergear atr43g3 .82 turbo,nismo injectors, power fc, z32 afm, etc.

My gtst is currently at the workshop (Unigroup). hopefully picking her up tomorrow! :)

In the end i think it will be worth it...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...