Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Haha i meant just pit the numbers in urself.

Ur right. I have found the same thing with interpolation on the fc so i dont use it anymore

i'm not talking about the interpolate feature in fc edit, i mean the actual ecu's interpolation between cells. if your halfway between 2 cells it interpolates between the 2 to give you a figure halfway between them. does this for both fuel and timing

....or get the knock detector and wire it into the vipec. but it is a shame it doesnt use the standard knock sensors, even the emanage ultimate uses them.

Is it only PowerFC and emanage that use the OEM knock sensors then? Does Link not use them (suspect not if Vipec doesn't)?

I've been told that emanage is crap though and can drift.

Ah ok so Power FC has no safeguard then as such. Interesting.

BTW what ECU's still allow the CONSULT port to work? Does Nistune? I think e-manage does etc and other piggybacks but they are not that great from what I hear except f-con gold which is proprietary and you can't tune it yourself?

i'm not talking about the interpolate feature in fc edit, i mean the actual ecu's interpolation between cells. if your halfway between 2 cells it interpolates between the 2 to give you a figure halfway between them. does this for both fuel and timing

Ahh ok. Now i know what u mean. U must be tuning on to the edge if 1 degree or half a degree is needed

Ah ok so Power FC has no safeguard then as such. Interesting.

BTW what ECU's still allow the CONSULT port to work? Does Nistune? I think e-manage does etc and other piggybacks but they are not that great from what I hear except f-con gold which is proprietary and you can't tune it yourself?

Itdoesnt have a control safegaurd but it does flash a light on the dash which i think is a very good control telling the driver to back off and check the hand controller

Ahh ok. Now i know what u mean. U must be tuning on to the edge if 1 degree or half a degree is needed

yer on my car i do, obviously wouldnt on anyone elses tho.

and yes nistune allows you to use the consult port as standard

I actually don't mind emanage for some applications. for the money they are not a bad solution and best bit is of course you keep the stock ECU so there is no excuse for a poorly running car. :)

but I still think for the budding home tuner the cheapest and easiset way to get into it is a power FC, a wideband and datalogit.

november last year, me and my mate drove to just bout every tuner we could find in WA to find a tuner for his Haltech, and no one wanted to touch it! after about 6 places we got refered to a shop who apparantly like working on haltechs. he drove in with a Tune from C-RED with 21psi 400rwhp (gt35r, rb25det,6boost etc) drove out with 325hp on bout 3psi less.

every shop was saying "na let us take out the haltech and install something else"

moral of the story is, haltech = fail investement of $1200

ive heard similiar things about wolf 3d's

+1 on the Vipec.

I used to have a Microtech and found that an absolute pain in the ass to try and learn how to tune on. I ended up selling it and buying a Vipec and now I do my own tuning.

The layout of it all and ease of finding settings makes it a pleasure.

Hey are Vipec and Link Same Same?

but I still think for the budding home tuner the cheapest and easiset way to get into it is a power FC, a wideband and datalogit.

Exactly

It really is easy as the pfc has the base already set up but you must know the basics about tuning and engine parameters to start with

I've had my datalogit only acouple weeks now and have already gotten the wot tune spot on even though i'm still learning little tips and tricks using the software and i am working on the low load/cruize now.....its a beeeze compared to using the hc

And as said before pfc does not pull timing or anything like that when it senses det...but the most important thing is it does detect it !!! this is what sealed the deal for me

Every Tom Dick and Harry has one here so you could get support if needed although some remained tight lipped probably because of fear that you might become the next best tuner but say what, lots or reading and trial and error will get you there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...