Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gidday all,

Just looking for some ideas on a problem ive encountered. My car makes 295kws on 14psi and then basically stops making power from that point on even with the cam gears adjusted, more boost and ignition timing changed etc.Ive added the dyno plot which shows 4 psi = about 9 kws which isnt right for a turbo of my size.

Rb30det

R32 rb25 head with cam gears but stock cams

Rebuilt internals

8.5 comp rb30, all rebuilt etc

3.5 inch exhaust with one muffler (loud as hell so hopefully flows ok)

gt3540 1.06 turbo, with Sinco customs turbo manifold with the gate out the housing.

Im just looking for some first hand ideas of what the problem may be. Some would say cams, but ive had friends of friends make 370kws on the stock cams. My intake is a bit interesting so have added up a picture of that 2.

Any suggestions would be great, but if you dont know, please dont post as it will just give me things to check that i dont need to.

Cheers

post-21312-0-81235400-1296044413_thumb.jpg

post-21312-0-94193800-1296044430_thumb.jpg

Edited by SirRacer
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/351809-weird-problem-with-rb3025/
Share on other sites

Which intake manifold is that? It looks like the RB20 manifold. I would think that is your restriction. From what i've read on this site is that these manifold wont make more than 300kw, should look into getting a front facing plenum.

My 2cents

Well we all know it's not the cams, plenty of people have run far more power with the same turbo.

Check the timing belt is on correct, even if you've checked it. Recheck. the amount of times this has been the issue is amazing of late.

Doesnt sound like exhaust issues, either way drop it from the dump pipe, super easy check

Inlet manifold as stated above is a good option too, but more hassle

Measure boost pressure @ turbo outlet and somewhere after the intercooler to check to see if there is a pressure drop/issue

That'll give you plenty for now.

I'm thinking an inlet manifold too.

I'd look at getting yourself a greddy copy or something. Can be had from Autobarn for about $350. Don't buy ebay ones, they are shit, and you'll end up replacing it.

Thanks guys.

Exhaust has no cat, one cannon muffler and bugger all bends. Its noisy as hell but i didnt build it as a street car.

Intake is an r32 so you cant just go and buy a greddy copy so easily, its custom manifold time.

I asked about the timing belt and whether the cams werent installed at TDC, but the tuner said the engine ran way too smoothly for that to be the case.

Will check out the turbo pressure drop too.

A friend of mine whos very clued up with rb's is doing some research as well so hopefully we can get to the bottom of the problem.

what brand are the cam gears

are they secure, have they been double checked

check base timing at idle

as ash said, double check, triple check

whatever is wrong, is fundamentally wrong given the power is ass, ie it wont be a slight restriction causing it, id say timing is way off or something fundamental to make that much of a difference in the results (or to hamper it)

Greddy cam gears. Very secure. We adjusted them both ways and they just shifted the power curve.

Something is definitley wrong somewhere so all these ideas are great. Im not sure about the fuel batch idea though, maybe read the post a bit more, as its making power everywhere else, so there isnt any reason why at a set point it should stop.

295kws @14 psi is actually pretty good power wise, its just once we get past this point that things cause issues.I asked the tuner about the timing and he said its bang on. Cant download the map at the moment but will send it to Lith who will no doubt check it out once ive got the info.

It won't be in the map, it'll be something else dude.

As i said - just because you are "told" the timing belt is correct, does not mean it is.

Cars can have a belt off 1-2 teeth and run/idle perfectly but have issues @ varying points.

You really need to have it all checked and ruled out otherwise you'll never get anywhere.

Is this DIY mechanic sort of thing or should i be checked by a workshop? Will get it checked by mechanic mate on Saturday. I asked the tuner about this also as the engine has just been rebuilt. He seemed to think that it wouldnt make good power anywhere if that was the case, but will check it now anyway.

I havent seen any other rb25de (r32) intakes with power levels higher than this so thought id may have been that.

Edited by SirRacer

Only reason I asked for the map was I wanted to see what was happening with timing and fuel in the higher load zones, IMHO at 14psi its making reasonable power for the boost level - so the fundamental flaw isn't related to the engine's inherant ability to use air and make power... there is something that changes when it goes from 14psi to 18psi. If the tuner was having to do weird things to keep everything happy, I thought it might be a clue given its the closest to having the car right in front of me.

The power curve tracks the previous one - usually with a boost leak or a restriction of sorts the curve will change shape a bit, but in this case it actually looks like the boost level is different but its hardly reflected at all in torque or power anywhere in the curve. At the moment it seems easiest to blame the inlet manifold, though there are apparently other cars which have made more on the stock one on pump gas - I haven't seen any in person myself however, as most people seem to go aftermarket after 300kw.

Just tracked down a guy in NZ who has had a similar problem. He couldnt quite explain it but the gist was that the belt was stretching and throwing the timing out.

Anyone care to explain how this would work?

I spoke to a friend whos a mechanic tonight and he seemed to think if the belt was out and throwing timing the car would run like crap, yet mine runs perfectly.

This is what he wrote anyway (i cant quite decipher it)

"My Car we changed the 360 degree cam angle sensor

And I put on a Crank Angle Sensor. Was going out by 14-15 degree now is 0/0 perfect timing.

When we put cam angle sensor on made 409kw I think and timing out by 4 degrees. Put Crank angle sensor on the 0/0 made 451kw at same boost"

the Nissan CAS do weird things when on the fritz i've had a similar issue to your NZ mate but it had nothing to do cam belt stretch.... as for your actual issue i could not say.

Just tracked down a guy in NZ who has had a similar problem. He couldnt quite explain it but the gist was that the belt was stretching and throwing the timing out.

Tuner should probably be able to see symptoms of this while tuning - thats with the CAS. I'd also expect this to be an obvious issue at all boost levels.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...