Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you have a 20k budget why on earth would you even entertain the idea of using an rb25 head.

The RB25 (non NEO) head is very understated. Bigger ports than a 26, has VCT. The only thing that lets it down would be the hydraulic lifters if you are planning on revving it past 8500rpm.

As a sort of aside, everyone says that Rb30's are a cheaper option, since stroker kits are up around the 6-7K mark. However, they all come with a set of forged rods, pistons, crank etc. By the time you get forged pistons and rods for your rb30 build wouldn't it be costing up around that mark anyway?

hmmm all valid points, and yeah the whole thing about RB cranks is right, I think that Nitto thing may end up being the way I go with an RB26 head, those stroker kits are nuts with a 12k rpm limiter, and means I can run a retardedly oversized turbo haha

and yeah the length is basically why it loses harmonic stability, also any buildup on certain counterweights are going to have a big issue in harmonics as well

lots of factors but yeah i heard about those nitto kits the other day and was just :yucky: YEEEEEEAHHHHHHHHHH

20K... Why would you bother staying with an RB engine?

LS2 plus twin turbos...

/Thread.

because i'm not like every arsehole in my arsehole home town and go and throw V8's in anything that moves because "v8's are hectic" i'd prefer something original and more JDM (sorry big purist)

as said, its a 31. 31s live for slapper 30s with cast pistons and 25+psi boost

whats so arseholeish about a v8 31? more power and torque everywhere is a bad thing now is it? twin turbo ls2 skyline would be awesome

because i'm not like every arsehole in my arsehole home town and go and throw V8's in anything that moves because "v8's are hectic" i'd prefer something original and more JDM (sorry big purist)

so your saying GT autosounds ls1 r34 isnt hectik?

but in this case slapper 25/30 would be more cost effective or a rb20, both goes well with 25psi!

as said, its a 31. 31s live for slapper 30s with cast pistons and 25+psi boost

whats so arseholeish about a v8 31? more power and torque everywhere is a bad thing now is it? twin turbo ls2 skyline would be awesome

Twin turbo LS2 Skyline IS awesome, I can tell you from experience.*

*I had a dream lastnight.

No.

Put it this way. For $7500 you get a fully assembled balanced/blueprinted RB30 forged bottom end built by RIPS rated at 1300hp and 9000rpm.

That's awesome! Why don't people who want to modify their engines just save up and put these in? I mean that's pretty cheap, why bother going down a more expensive path?

Because they're dirty forklift engines that don't rev.:rolleyes:

yeah, that confrimed my suspisions, rb30 is a much better option than a normal stroker.

Now, a stroked RB30... wasn't someone trying to make a RB34 kit somewhere?

That's awesome! Why don't people who want to modify their engines just save up and put these in? I mean that's pretty cheap, why bother going down a more expensive path?

Because people are stupid and think they can do it for cheaper, reality is there is a reasonable chance the builder you pick will stuff it up.

so your saying GT autosounds ls1 r34 isnt hectik?

but in this case slapper 25/30 would be more cost effective or a rb20, both goes well with 25psi!

gt autosounds ls1 r34 is one of the meanest things to grace our tracks. it does not make traction anywhere. and the funny thing is... weigh and rb30 bottom end and weigh an ls1 bottom end. and no, the bottom end in the ls1 isnt weak.

im an rb fan yes. hell i have poored over 12 grand into the lastest engine in the 33 track car and its still no where near complete. but i do think often that im pooring money into an old heavy engine and i could of spent it better taking other avenues. next time ill go a blown ls2 lol. if the missus doesnt cut my nuts off for pooring every cent i earn into cars lol

Because they're dirty forklift engines that don't rev.:rolleyes:

yeah, that confrimed my suspisions, rb30 is a much better option than a normal stroker.

Now, a stroked RB30... wasn't someone trying to make a RB34 kit somewhere?

Spool have made a RB34 kit. Think that was only 6k

That's awesome! Why don't people who want to modify their engines just save up and put these in? I mean that's pretty cheap, why bother going down a more expensive path?

Yep it is a fantastic option and in reality way overkill for most applications.

If my engine ever pops and I decide I want to do a RB30 i'll just get one of RIPS cheaper kits ($3000ish) and slap my head onto it.

Because people are stupid and think they can do it for cheaper, reality is there is a reasonable chance the builder you pick will stuff it up.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

20k isnt that much for a build from scratch including tuning.

if he is going 3.2 would need another 7-10k for a head to utilise the bottom end,

decent turbo kit is going to take up 5k of it?

fuel system?

or is the 20k just for a long engine?

saves around 5k by not stroking it, std 26 or 30.

but if its to run a big turbo on a dyno it wont need extra capacity

Edited by jangles
  • 2 weeks later...

tbh the Spool kit is something I'd steer clear of, most of the kits I've seen use I-beams but they use H-beams, and there was a fair bit of clearancing at the bottom of the combustion chamber. I did look into those RIPS motors..

and lol i didn't actually say money is no object, the budget is $20k for a running, driveable car (though massive power and driveable on street rarely go in the same sentence tbh)

i thought about the RIPS, it revs to 9K, I could get a Nitto stroker kit with an RB30 block for the same rated at 1600hp and 12k rpm max though?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...